Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 No doubt Parker will get MOTM still. Doesn't he start with MotM and it has to be taken off him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Doesn't sound like you know the laws tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? It still hit him ffs. Correct desicion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Here's a tip read the rules of offisde. You are offside if you touch the ball, doesn't matter if it's on the line, in the corners etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Doesn't sound like you know the laws tbh. Rules is rules. Parking inspector logic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Stevenage's chants are so fucking generic and monotonous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Stevenage's chants are so fucking generic and monotonous. Just like the town then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Doesn't sound like you know the laws tbh. Rules is rules. Parking inspector logic. As opposed to you who doesn't seem to have any logic whatsoever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Stevenage's chants are so fucking generic and monotonous. Just like the town then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Doesn't sound like you know the laws tbh. Rules is rules. Parking inspector logic. As opposed to you who doesn't seem to have any logic whatsoever. What illogical about deeming inconsequential actions irrelevant? Rules need changing. If an own goal and a deflection can be determined by the same judgement, so can this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Been more impressed with Stevenage's right back than I ever have with Simpson against Bale Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Sunderland are still the highest ranked team to have qualified for the 1/4 finals. :sick: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Doesn't sound like you know the laws tbh. Rules is rules. Parking inspector logic. As opposed to you who doesn't seem to have any logic whatsoever. What illogical about deeming inconsequential actions irrelevant? Rules need changing. If an own goal and a deflection can be determined by the same judgement, so can this. The last attacking player to touch the ball before it went into the net was offside. How can this even be argued? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not interfering. Would have went in regardless. Pathetic. Are you blind? The ball changed direction. Was it going out for a throw until it hit him? Doesn't sound like you know the laws tbh. Rules is rules. Parking inspector logic. As opposed to you who doesn't seem to have any logic whatsoever. What illogical about deeming inconsequential actions irrelevant? Rules need changing. If an own goal and a deflection can be determined by the same judgement, so can this. The last attacking player to touch the ball before it went into the net was offside. How can this even be argued? Fucking hell, when did I dispute what occurred or what the letter of the law currently is? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Stevenage manager has been sucking too much cock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Hate it when they do this touchline thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 I know what you argued, but if an attacking player contacts the ball, it is always significant. Always. The goal would've been awarded to Parker had it stood, and he was offside. Changing the rule to accommodate this sort of situation is completely nonsensical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 I know what you argued, but if an attacking player contacts the ball, it is always significant. Always. The goal would've been awarded to Parker had it stood, and he was offside. Changing the rule to accommodate this sort of situation is completely nonsensical. Punishing for an event that hasn't put a side at an unfair advantage is nonsensical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Ryan Nelson is a fucking joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 What a waste. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Spurs through then, good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 What a horrible last minute attempt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 What a waste. :lol: Rush of blood to the head! Credit to Stevenage today btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts