Jump to content

NUFC transfer rumours in the press


Recommended Posts

Guest sicko2ndbest

Surely new thread worthy?

 

Dutch TV

Agent comments

Ryder insinuating

 

It's as much as Cissokho had :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

 

Are you seriously suggesting Anita would be a Guthrie replacement as in a mere squad player for us? Why would he leave Ajax where he is a guaranteed starter and in the CL to sit on our bench? Also, can't see us spending >10m on a "Guthrie replacement".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

 

Are you seriously suggesting Anita would be a Guthrie replacement as in a mere squad player for us? Why would he leave Ajax where he is a guaranteed starter and in the CL to sit on our bench? Also, can't see us spending >10m on a "Guthrie replacement".

 

:snod:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now basically switched off from any transfer talk, both in's and out's. There is so much bullshit being written on a daily basis that I've chosen not to believe any of it.

 

If it happens then it happens, think we'll be ok on Sept 1st.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

 

Are you seriously suggesting Anita would be a Guthrie replacement as in a mere squad player for us? Why would he leave Ajax where he is a guaranteed starter and in the CL to sit on our bench? Also, can't see us spending >10m on a "Guthrie replacement".

 

No... I'm talking basic like for like style replacements to our squad... Not sure where he would fit into first eleven considering the positions he plays are currently held by our better players... Maybe more competition for Jonas and to rotate with Tiote/Cabaye when unavailable... As for a £10m fee I can't see it myself...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

 

Are you seriously suggesting Anita would be a Guthrie replacement as in a mere squad player for us? Why would he leave Ajax where he is a guaranteed starter and in the CL to sit on our bench? Also, can't see us spending >10m on a "Guthrie replacement".

 

No... I'm talking basic like for like style replacements to our squad... Not sure where he would fit into first eleven considering the positions he plays are currently held by our better players... Maybe more competition for Jonas and to rotate with Tiote/Cabaye when unavailable... As for a £10m fee I can't see it myself...

 

I reckon if we got this lad and keep Tiote then Anita will replace Jonas as DM alongside Tiote in the 4-2-1-3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

 

Are you seriously suggesting Anita would be a Guthrie replacement as in a mere squad player for us? Why would he leave Ajax where he is a guaranteed starter and in the CL to sit on our bench? Also, can't see us spending >10m on a "Guthrie replacement".

 

No... I'm talking basic like for like style replacements to our squad... Not sure where he would fit into first eleven considering the positions he plays are currently held by our better players... Maybe more competition for Jonas and to rotate with Tiote/Cabaye when unavailable... As for a £10m fee I can't see it myself...

 

I reckon if we got this lad and keep Tiote then Anita will replace Jonas as DM alongside Tiote in the 4-2-1-3

 

That would make some of my dreams come true!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie's replacement sorted if this happens...

 

£5M-£7M spent on a replacement for Guthrie seems just very strange though.

 

Yeah i think Amalfitano is Guthrie's replacement..... this is more a quality addition to the squad that can play DM and in both fullback positions.

 

Disagree from what little i've seen of both... Amalfitano appears more of an attacking midfielder so replaces Lovenkrands for me whereas Anita seems to player deeper... Either way they both look like technical upgrades...

 

Are you seriously suggesting Anita would be a Guthrie replacement as in a mere squad player for us? Why would he leave Ajax where he is a guaranteed starter and in the CL to sit on our bench? Also, can't see us spending >10m on a "Guthrie replacement".

 

No... I'm talking basic like for like style replacements to our squad... Not sure where he would fit into first eleven considering the positions he plays are currently held by our better players... Maybe more competition for Jonas and to rotate with Tiote/Cabaye when unavailable... As for a £10m fee I can't see it myself...

 

I reckon if we got this lad and keep Tiote then Anita will replace Jonas as DM alongside Tiote in the 4-2-1-3

 

That would make some of my dreams come true!

 

Jonas could then play in Ba's position against the big teams. Offering more workrate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see why he has to be anyones direct replacment. That would be assuming we have balanced numbers in the squad in this first place. Players come and go, there not always related to one another.

 

However if we do sign this lad, I would have to question Tiotes future.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see why he has to be anyones direct replacment. That would be assuming we have balanced numbers in the squad in this first place. Players come and go, there not always related to one another.

 

However if we do sign this lad, I would have to question Tiotes future.

 

Since its us and mike I would have to agree with that question.

If it had been another top club i would see them pairing them in a 4-2-3-1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if we do sell Tiote, we won't have spend the rest of the summer wondering if we will replace him.

 

Its not that I want to be negative, just that I see it as the most likely outcome. Both Man Utd and Chelsea have been linked to him, the signs aren't good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the deal prolly wont go trough either..

 

Vurnon Anita's agent regarding Newcastle bid: "The bid is too low. "I understand that Ajax has rejected this" says Harry Lulofs #nufc #Ajax

 

Dont feel like Mike is the guy to stretch himself :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if we do sell Tiote, we won't have spend the rest of the summer wondering if we will replace him.

 

Its not that I want to be negative, just that I see it as the most likely outcome. Both Man Utd and Chelsea have been linked to him, the signs aren't good.

 

I'm pretty sure Tiote will stay. Man U can't afford him.  Chelsea have enough physical presence in the midfield. They need flair, creativity and speed. To utilize HBA most efficiently I think Pards will go for a 4-3-3 formation next season. Anita will play together with Tiote, he's not his replacement.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if we do sell Tiote, we won't have spend the rest of the summer wondering if we will replace him.

 

Its not that I want to be negative, just that I see it as the most likely outcome. Both Man Utd and Chelsea have been linked to him, the signs aren't good.

 

I'm pretty sure Tiote will stay. Man U can't afford him.  Chelsea have enough physical presence in the midfield. They need flair, creativity and speed. To utilize HBA most efficiently I think Pards will go for a 4-3-3 formation next season. Anita will play together with Tiote, he's not his replacement.

What?  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the deal prolly wont go trough either..

 

Vurnon Anita's agent regarding Newcastle bid: "The bid is too low. "I understand that Ajax has rejected this" says Harry Lulofs #nufc #Ajax

 

Dont feel like Mike is the guy to stretch himself :)

 

Agent is spouting off way too much. Which generally isnt how we operate. I smell bullshit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the deal prolly wont go trough either..

 

Vurnon Anita's agent regarding Newcastle bid: "The bid is too low. "I understand that Ajax has rejected this" says Harry Lulofs #nufc #Ajax

 

Dont feel like Mike is the guy to stretch himself :)

 

Pretty much confirms we're in for him if you ask me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if we do sell Tiote, we won't have spend the rest of the summer wondering if we will replace him.

 

Its not that I want to be negative, just that I see it as the most likely outcome. Both Man Utd and Chelsea have been linked to him, the signs aren't good.

 

I'm pretty sure Tiote will stay. Man U can't afford him.  Chelsea have enough physical presence in the midfield. They need flair, creativity and speed. To utilize HBA most efficiently I think Pards will go for a 4-3-3 formation next season. Anita will play together with Tiote, he's not his replacement.

What?  :lol:

 

Tiote is valued in the £20 mill bracket and we don't need to sell. SAF just said he won't pay £20 mill for Tiote.  I don't think that's because he suddenly doesn't fancy expensive players (he's bought plenty of them previously), but because  he's now under more financial restraint than before.  Their debt is around £420 mill, and unlike us they have to pay interest. When that interest could be as high as 16%, money disappears quickly, despite inreased income.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2145794/Manchester-United-net-debt-rises-26m.html

 

Manchester United are bracing themselves for a new supporter backlash after their latest accounts revealed they lost £71million to financial obligations imposed by owners the Glazers over the last nine months.

While United's accounts say gross debt has dropped by £61.2m from £484.5m to £423.3m - a 12.6 per cent reduction - this is countered by the club's cash reserves falling from £113m to £25.6m, a reduction of £87.4m.

In short, this means United are £26m worse off than 12 months ago.

 

A 5.8 per cent fall in total revenue - from £75.2m to £70.8m - reflects United's exit from the Champions League at the group stage and an early defeat in the FA Cup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...