ponsaelius Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Couldn't give a shit about the line, wasn't a fucking foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 The incident with Santon and Johnson in the first half should have had alarm bells ringing. I never understand why Johnson doesn't start, he must be having some shit games when i'm not looking because whenever I see him, his pace always causes real problems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 How anyone can say that's 'obviously outside the box' is beyond me. And that's when viewing a still, not them moving in. PS: on the line is inside. Where is the lineswoman who gave it? My initial thought was that it was outside and I'm usually quite fair when we do something wrong. Below the ' in N'Castle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Couldn't give a s*** about the line, wasn't a f***ing foul. that was my thought, still think so aftyer seeing it again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlelunchbox Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 think pardew's ego has taken a huge dent today. wonder what the fat one will say to him tonight. Hopefully he'll show him a picture of Shola and then just punch it into Pardews face. hahahah why would he do that. pardew will only take that as a hint to play him more the daft silverfox. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 what's the point of Gosling? offers nothing in defense or attack. We were better with him on the pitch, though. Aye because Cabaye was piss poor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Here's where Duff ended up, which gives an idea of the forward momentum involved. http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8453/capturextr.png It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Nice appealing mid-fall btw. Wanker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Couldn't give a s*** about the line, wasn't a f***ing foul. It certainly was a foul. Outside the box though, so not a penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlelunchbox Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 can we stop going on about the decisions made by ref, we fucked up today wasnt because of the ref. it was because we were shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Here's where Duff ended up, which gives an idea of the forward momentum involved. http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8453/capturextr.png It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Nice appealing mid-fall btw. Wanker. isn't there some rule about the foul continuing and the fk/pen given at the last point or something? seem to remember that being talked about last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 what's the point of Gosling? offers nothing in defense or attack. We were better with him on the pitch, though. Aye because Cabaye was p*ss poor He wasn't great. Don't think he was piss poor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Couldn't give a shit about the line, wasn't a fucking foul. This is where you should know your players, our players should have been told that Duff throws himself to the fall at the slightest touch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Before they were awarded the first, I was thinking how pathetic they were to be diving all over the shop as a means of staging some quasi-footballing resistance... Santon not being goalside was a perfect opportunity for him to take a tumble, and he cashed in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Here's where Duff ended up, which gives an idea of the forward momentum involved. http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8453/capturextr.png It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Nice appealing mid-fall btw. w*****. Well true, but the initial contact was outside. which is way it should have been adjudicated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Couldn't give a s*** about the line, wasn't a f***ing foul. It certainly was a foul. Outside the box though, so not a penalty. Honestly don't think it was. Total dive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Here's where Duff ended up, which gives an idea of the forward momentum involved. http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8453/capturextr.png It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Nice appealing mid-fall btw. Wanker. isn't there some rule about the foul continuing and the fk/pen given at the last point or something? seem to remember that being talked about last season. Nope, the first contact is the point at which the free kick is given, in this instance anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Here's where Duff ended up, which gives an idea of the forward momentum involved. http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8453/capturextr.png It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Nice appealing mid-fall btw. w*****. Well true, but the initial contact was outside. which is way it should have been adjudicated. Doesn't work like that, even if you expect the ref to notice the 10cm or so they were outside the line. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 think pardew's ego has taken a huge dent today. wonder what the fat one will say to him tonight. Hopefully he'll show him a picture of Shola and then just punch it into Pardews face. hahahah why would he do that. pardew will only take that as a hint to play him more the daft silverfox. Aye, sadly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 It's an injustice because penalty/freekick/whatever, it's incredibly soft. Slightest of nudges from Santon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 How the f*** did we lose that never mind concede 4 goals in little over 15 mins or 5 in the second half. We should have been out of sight by ht. What I will say is that if we play a high line against teams that play on the counter attack with speed to burn then we will concede easy goals in games where we appear to be on top. I'm not sure who exactly I'm p*ssed off with for today but I'm completely convinced that after 45 mins that there is no way we could concede 5 goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Can't anyone remember Heskey at Wigan on Boxing Day a few years ago? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 Here's where Duff ended up, which gives an idea of the forward momentum involved. http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8453/capturextr.png It could have gone either way - today it went against us but it's nowhere near the injustice some are making out. Nice appealing mid-fall btw. w*****. Well true, but the initial contact was outside. which is way it should have been adjudicated. Doesn't work like that, even if you expect the ref to notice the 10cm or so they were outside the line. Well I beg to differ. On that I don't think we will get any further. Democracy is wonderful though isn't it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 I'm with Dave, only way that could've been spotted at the pace they were going in would be through video reffing tbh. Still annoying, mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 It falls under the advantage rule. The decision should be made over where the foul last occurs, not where it starts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 I should add that Duff is a complete wanker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now