Jump to content

sunderland


JH

Recommended Posts

what the f***s going on with MON. He's clearly a top manager who most clubs would love to have, but apart from the honeymoon period it just is not working here, he needs his right hand man. its been said before but he really is more like clough than we could have imagined,

 

first time in a while today i could not be arsed to watch the second half, went shopping in tesco with the mother in law instead. got a blowie tho so its all good

 

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=738701&page=107#ixzz2AWAPAzwX

 

:spit:

 

How is he a top manager that most clubs would love to have?

 

He's probably one of the most overrated managers since Paul Jewel/Phil Brown, he is tactically rubbish and plays boring park the bus football and my 6 month old Grandson has more clue in the transfer market.

 

Did he get a 'blowie' off the mother in law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what the f***s going on with MON. He's clearly a top manager who most clubs would love to have, but apart from the honeymoon period it just is not working here, he needs his right hand man. its been said before but he really is more like clough than we could have imagined,

 

first time in a while today i could not be arsed to watch the second half, went shopping in tesco with the mother in law instead. got a blowie tho so its all good

 

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=738701&page=107#ixzz2AWAPAzwX

 

:spit:

 

How is he a top manager that most clubs would love to have?

 

He's probably one of the most overrated managers since Paul Jewel/Phil Brown, he is tactically rubbish and plays boring park the bus football and my 6 month old Grandson has more clue in the transfer market.

 

Did he get a 'blowie' off the mother in law?

Welcome to Sunderland, population 240,000, surnames, 3.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to a mackem last night.  He said they played far better football under Bruce and that there was no way O'Neill would last the season if this continued up until Christmas.  He absolutely berated Johnson and Sesegnon, said McClean was a heap of over-rated shite and that he'd rather start Saha over Fletcher :lol:

 

The look on the face of another mackem was priceless as he said this.  It was a genuine moment of reality vs. The Marty Party delusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, just meant the positive from their perspective (and I assume the reason O'Neill is seemingly under no pressure from the media whatsoever) is that they've only lost once this season. But being hard to beat means little if you can't win a few along the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weren't Stoke unlucky not to win?

 

So thats a lucky win against Wigan, a lucky draw against us despite having man advantage for the majority of the game, and a lucky draw against Stoke.

 

They were lucky against Arsenal, Liverpool and Swansea too. They are very lucky to have the points total they have.

In exclusion some of their draws could be deemed decent results, but the fact that they have never once been the better side is much more telling.

O'Neill should not be making light of their astonishingly bad "shots on target" stats. It really does tell a story which the results don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weren't Stoke unlucky not to win?

 

So thats a lucky win against Wigan, a lucky draw against us despite having man advantage for the majority of the game, and a lucky draw against Stoke.

 

They were lucky against Arsenal, Liverpool and Swansea too. They are very lucky to have the points total they have.

In exclusion some of their draws could be deemed decent results, but the fact that they have never once been the better side is much more telling.

O'Neill should not be making light of their astonishingly bad "shots on target" stats. It really does tell a story which the results don't.

they have form on this score. on one of their previous relegations (not the hilarious ones, the one when craig russell was their top scorer) they spent the whole season saying "but no-ones giving us a hiding like the other clubs down there are getting" because the way they played meant they done as they are now,basically just being set up not to get beat so when they conceded they really struggled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Weren't Stoke unlucky not to win?

 

So thats a lucky win against Wigan, a lucky draw against us despite having man advantage for the majority of the game, and a lucky draw against Stoke.

 

They were absolutely gifted two goals at  Swansea as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=738905

 

They just don't get it do they? When you contribute 0 players forward and don't bother to attack you're going to be hard to beat. And all this 'when our forwards find some form' shit makes me feel sorry for them*, regardless of what form their front players get in they're still going to do fuck all as they won't be allowed to get forward playing the 'Marty' way.

 

* :yao:

Link to post
Share on other sites

what the f***s going on with MON. He's clearly a top manager who most clubs would love to have, but apart from the honeymoon period it just is not working here, he needs his right hand man. its been said before but he really is more like clough than we could have imagined,

 

first time in a while today i could not be arsed to watch the second half, went shopping in tesco with the mother in law instead. got a blowie tho so its all good

 

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=738701&page=107#ixzz2AWAPAzwX

 

:spit:

 

How is he a top manager that most clubs would love to have?

 

He's probably one of the most overrated managers since Paul Jewel/Phil Brown, he is tactically rubbish and plays boring park the bus football and my 6 month old Grandson has more clue in the transfer market.

 

Did he get a 'blowie' off the mother in law?

Welcome to Sunderland, population 240,000, surnames, 3.

 

 

They've got quarter of a million with three surnames x 3, Sunderlands an inbred club.(on this occasion, yes they are) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weeping openly in a thread entitled "1992ers v west brom".  How long are they going to go with this 1992 stuff until they realise everyone 30 or below grew up watching us post Keegan anyway?

 

The thing is they try and use that as a yardstick against us yet their attendances have actually increased more than ours have since 1992. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...