Alan Pardew

[Big Geordie]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

[Mick]

 

 

I go back to it, but they had Taarabt, Faurlin & Granero in there. Forget the fact they're 19th or whatever, they're 3 bloody good players. They never had a sniff all match apart from one moment where Taarabt skinned all three and played in Cisse.

 

QPR are a very poor side and still are, regardless of how well they've done with results since Redknapp arrived.

[ponsaelius]

Granero couldn't give a flying fuck about playing for QPR; a more pointless, half-arsed performance you will not see in the Premier League all season long.

 

The other two have not done anything to prove that they're great top flight players and as such they are where they are in the league for a reason. Without doubt the worst team I can remember seeing at SJP since we were promoted.

[Guest neesy111]

I cant believe how bad QPR were.  Even after 1-0 their attacking threat was minimal.

[ponsaelius]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

[Big Geordie]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

 

Stands to reason with me being a big lad! It's a cheap shot at a bloke who is still revered by those of a certain age as being a black and white legend. I've had a go at those on here who say that, before and will do so again.

[Pilko]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

fuck yee, Supermac has been a gobshite for years and his credibility as anyone who knows anything at all about NUFC is close to zero.

 

"may be talking shite here" ffs, it's a very common theme for someone apparently so great

[Guest neesy111]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

 

Stands to reason with me being a big lad! It's a cheap shot at a bloke who is still revered by those of a certain age as being a black and white legend. I've had a go at those on here who say that, before and will do so again.

 

It'll happen with the young generation with Shearer eventually imo if he continues on match of the day.

[Yorkie]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

 

Maybe, just this once, some people have got more of a clue about a particular subject than you do. MacDonald's a hero to many people, if my Dad is anything to go by. I'd probably snap at someone for calling Shearer a piss-head in twenty years time, for eg.

[Big Geordie]

He may be a gobshite, but it doesn't give an excuse to call him a drunk, ffs! He's always been opinionated - was apparently no different when he played for us. At least he speaks his mind, rather than banal tat that some pundits come out with.

[Disco]

3 DM + Jonas at home against QPR summarize the bloke.

 

 

I go back to it, but they had Taarabt, Faurlin & Granero in there. Forget the fact they're 19th or whatever, they're 3 bloody good players. They never had a sniff all match apart from one moment where Taarabt skinned all three and played in Cisse.

 

I don't even think it was anything to do with that, he stuck with the team that allegedly (didn't go) played well against City and rightly so. Even then, aside from Marveaux there is no-one else to put in really and even then many on here would advocate putting him on the wing. Anita barely played as a defensive minded player either.

[Skirge]

He may be a gobshite, but it doesn't give an excuse to call him a drunk, ffs! He's always been opinionated - was apparently no different when he played for us. At least he speaks his mind, rather than banal tat that some pundits come out with.

 

Just because he speaks his mind doesn't make it worthwhile, he may be off the drink but he is a bitter bitter jealous man.

[Big Geordie]

He may be a gobshite, but it doesn't give an excuse to call him a drunk, ffs! He's always been opinionated - was apparently no different when he played for us. At least he speaks his mind, rather than banal tat that some pundits come out with.

 

Just because he speaks his mind doesn't make it worthwhile, he may be off the drink but he is a bitter bitter jealous man.

 

That's fair enough, Skirge. My issue is with those calling him a pisshead, time after time again.

[Guest neesy111]

He may be a gobshite, but it doesn't give an excuse to call him a drunk, ffs! He's always been opinionated - was apparently no different when he played for us. At least he speaks his mind, rather than banal tat that some pundits come out with.

 

Just because he speaks his mind doesn't make it worthwhile, he may be off the drink but he is a bitter bitter jealous man.

 

Just like Keegan then.

[Dave]

Oh dear.

[Guest neesy111]

Have I just opened a can of worms?

[Mick]

 

 

Just because he speaks his mind doesn't make it worthwhile, he may be off the drink but he is a bitter bitter jealous man.

 

How do you know he's bitter or jealous and of what?

[Skirge]

He may be a gobshite, but it doesn't give an excuse to call him a drunk, ffs! He's always been opinionated - was apparently no different when he played for us. At least he speaks his mind, rather than banal tat that some pundits come out with.

 

Just because he speaks his mind doesn't make it worthwhile, he may be off the drink but he is a bitter bitter jealous man.

 

That's fair enough, Skirge. My issue is with those calling him a pisshead, time after time again.

 

Have to say in my first reaction/post I called him a pisshead but its not really anything to do with what he said. He may still be drinking I don't know but whenever I hear him on the radio or read his shit in the paper he always comes across as a player hater and I thik its to do with money. Moncur is the same not as bad but still always negative putting players down looking for issues where there aren't any.

 

I may be wrong its just how I perceive him, just my opinion I know its criminal on here to have one of those.

[ponsaelius]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

 

Maybe, just this once, some people have got more of a clue about a particular subject than you do. MacDonald's a hero to many people, if my Dad is anything to go by. I'd probably snap at someone for calling Shearer a piss-head in twenty years time, for eg.

 

I made a point to not bring his footballing talent into it (since I couldn't possibly comment) and merely called him on the constant stream of lies and negative shite he comes out with on the Legends and in the press.

 

Why would somebody call Shearer a pisshead? As far as I'm aware he's not. He is however a largely abysmal pundit, with the personality of a doormat. Footballing ability/achievement and what players do away from the pitch are very separate things, I don't know why people get offended by such.

[Guest neesy111]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

 

Maybe, just this once, some people have got more of a clue about a particular subject than you do. MacDonald's a hero to many people, if my Dad is anything to go by. I'd probably snap at someone for calling Shearer a piss-head in twenty years time, for eg.

 

I made a point to not bring his footballing talent into it (since I couldn't possibly comment) and merely called him on the constant stream of lies and negative shite he comes out with on the Legends and in the press.

 

Why would somebody call Shearer a pisshead? As far as I'm aware he's not. He is however a largely abysmal pundit, with the personality of a doormat. Footballing ability/achievement and what players do away from the pitch are very separate things, I don't know why people get offended by such.

 

Btw, he was on the drink because he needed a knee operation but couldn't afford it and it started a downward spiral (something which has happened to quite a few footballers from the 60's and 70's).  Not an excuse for his drink driving conviction though.

[cp40]

He may be a gobshite, but it doesn't give an excuse to call him a drunk, ffs! He's always been opinionated - was apparently no different when he played for us. At least he speaks his mind, rather than banal tat that some pundits come out with.

 

Just because he speaks his mind doesn't make it worthwhile, he may be off the drink but he is a bitter bitter jealous man.

 

That's fair enough, Skirge. My issue is with those calling him a pisshead, time after time again.

 

Have to say in my first reaction/post I called him a pisshead but its not really anything to do with what he said. He may still be drinking I don't know but whenever I hear him on the radio or read his shit in the paper he always comes across as a player hater and I thik its to do with money. Moncur is the same not as bad but still always negative putting players down looking for issues where there aren't any.

 

I may be wrong its just how I perceive him, just my opinion I know its criminal on here to have one of those.

 

 

might be a little bit of envy of the money skirge- but I think these older generation players just dont like the whinging, diving, cheating, shit that goes on in the modern game- Cant blame them for that its fucking bullshit. They played at a time when they would have been chopped in half for some of that shit , and the ref would have looked away.

[Mick]

http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-articles/a-typical-alan-pardew-performance/

 

 

A Typical Alan Pardew Performance?

 

 

43 mins ago by Toon Bano

 

As we managed to fall over the line to a 1-0 ‘win’ over QPR its got to be said that was one of the worst games of football I have ever seen in my whole life.

 

Caused by mainly two things;

 

a) QPR being one of the worst teams that have ever shown up at St James’ Park and

 

b) Our defensive starting line up.

 

Those two miserable things cancelled each other out into an insufferable bore fest that would kill anyone’s Christmas spirit no matter how jolly they were feeling prior to kick off.

 

But this kind of performance from us on our own patch against a completely inferior side is no surprise whatsoever to all of us, or it shouldn’t be, it’s a typical Alan Pardew performance which we have come to expect in his 2 years here as manager. We didn’t exactly ‘win’ that game on Saturday afternoon but just managed to get the ball into their net on that bare minimal occasion, as the opposition had no chance of doing the same to us. QPR were hopeless. We were not much better.

 

If it became public that Pardew’s tactics are to strangle a game to death for 70 minutes and then try and steal it with his subs, then I would believe it. The thought of hammering a far inferior team for 90 mins making the afternoon not just more entertaining but a whole lot easier for us, doesn’t even enter his brain. We could/should have won that game by 2 or 3 goals without a problem if only Pardew had the ambition to do so. His starting line up sums him up.

 

Why on God’s green earth Pardew picked that starting line up against a team who have only won one game all season is one of the most baffling, negative, inexplicable team sheets I have ever seen. Having James Perch AND Checik Tiote in the same starting line up, alongside Anita in the middle of the park, was totally unnecessary.

 

Was Alan Pardew THAT scared of Adel Taarabt? A player who is as consistent as the sun staying out in summer. If Taarabt played well last week, chances are he won’t be as good this week. That’s what players like him are like. Sure enough he was abysmal. He offered barely no threat to our defence, yet Tiote and Perch played for 70 mins until Cheick was withdrawn. Ridiculous.

 

Arguably those weren’t the most inexcusable factors of our starting line up. No, that honour goes to the decision to not just play a defender and holding midfielder together but to also play Jonas Gutierrez in the left wing position. Sweet Jesus Christ! The thought of this line up for a home game against Queens Park Strangers makes me want to burst out laughing in terrified bemusement. But Pardew actually did it! We had Jonas, Anita, Tiote and Perch as part of a front 6 with Cisse stuck out on the right wing. This is literally mind boggling considering the importance of a win and the quality of the opposition.

 

Playing the most defensive ‘wide player’ we have arguably had in our 120 year history in the advanced left wing position of a 4-3-3 is probably the LAST thing I would choose given the options available. I kid you not. I would rather we had played Sylvain Marveaux, Gab Obertan, Demba Ba, Papiss Cisse, Sammy Ameobi, Davide Santon, Shane Ferguson or Shola Ameobi in that position before Jonas Gutierrez and I am not just saying that for dramatic effect.

 

Yet lo and behold ‘Mr 8 year contract in the back pocket’ went and did it! Incredible. The fact the game was still 0-0 with no shots on target by the time he was dragged off was of no surprise to me or any of us whatsoever. What a waste of attacking space.

 

As soon as Sylvain Marveaux came on the pitch after 75 minutes of nothingness, he got himself an assist within 3 minutes. That’s THREE minutes. Just imagine what he could have done with 90 minutes to work with. He almost got himself a goal just 2 minutes after that. He literally did more  in 5 minutes than Jonas Gutierrez managed to achieve in an hour. Now I am not saying Jonas is a terrible player, I am saying if you’re going to insist on playing him, then do it in a position that suits his game because he certainly isn’t a flying winger. He hasn’t been one of those since about the year 2009. Wake the hell up Pardew.

 

In fact, why am I even wasting my time by suggesting to Pards to wake up? It’s never going to happen. This is a man who thinks we have actually been playing well recently. He has been quoted several times using the words ‘in form’ to describe our recent games. He is a madman. He must be spending his Christmas at the head of a table wearing a mad hat, sipping tea with a white rabbit and some shrunken down blonde girl next to a vanishing cat that won’t stop grinning. Pardew is on another planet to the rest of us. When he believes things like ‘we have been playing well recently’ is when he totally unintentionally exposes his standards as a manager. Only an average manager who is used to fighting relegation every season would think that what we have been churning out over the past few games is of a decent standard.

 

The loss at Stoke wasn’t a good performance, we lost. We lost to two soft avoidable goals and created next to nothing in chances. Our performance at Fulham wasn’t good, we lost. We lost to two soft avoidable goals and created next to nothing in chances. Our performance against Man City wasn’t  better and we lost. We lost to three soft avoidable goals (whilst being ripped apart consistently) and created next to nothing in chances. It’s a recurring theme. If that theme is the definition of ‘playing well’ and ‘being in form’ with the quality of the our squad available then you’re either lying or you’re topping yourself up at your mental tea party with Alice and the twins. Sheer madness.

 

[ponsaelius]

Yup - playing the drunk card with Supermac is a cheap trick that only the mackems do. He may be talking shite here, but those calling him a piss-head should hang their heads in shame. Pack of cunts.

 

Very, very tall horse you got there.

 

Maybe, just this once, some people have got more of a clue about a particular subject than you do. MacDonald's a hero to many people, if my Dad is anything to go by. I'd probably snap at someone for calling Shearer a piss-head in twenty years time, for eg.

 

I made a point to not bring his footballing talent into it (since I couldn't possibly comment) and merely called him on the constant stream of lies and negative shite he comes out with on the Legends and in the press.

 

Why would somebody call Shearer a pisshead? As far as I'm aware he's not. He is however a largely abysmal pundit, with the personality of a doormat. Footballing ability/achievement and what players do away from the pitch are very separate things, I don't know why people get offended by such.

 

Btw, he was on the drink because he needed a knee operation but couldn't afford it and it started a downward spiral (something which has happened to quite a few footballers from the 60's and 70's).  Not an excuse for his drink driving conviction though.

 

I know, I've read his autobiography before. To be fair to him he is very honest about his faults it there.

 

But the shite he talks in the press and on the show far outweights that. Just comes across as a total gobshite to the point of real irritation.

[Yorkie]

Shearer isn't a pisshead, I'm just saying thats the hypothetical equivalent.

 

You can't negate his achievements for this club just so youve got grounds to call the man a cunt. Especially considering the amount of actual cunts who have represented us, and not scored a 100 goals.

[Guest hatem garrincha]

3 DM + Jonas at home against QPR summarize the bloke.

 

 

I go back to it, but they had Taarabt, Faurlin & Granero in there. Forget the fact they're 19th or whatever, they're 3 bloody good players. They never had a sniff all match apart from one moment where Taarabt skinned all three and played in Cisse.

 

I don't even think it was anything to do with that, he stuck with the team that allegedly (didn't go) played well against City and rightly so. Even then, aside from Marveaux there is no-one else to put in really and even then many on here would advocate putting him on the wing. Anita barely played as a defensive minded player either.

 

I can understand a midfield of Tiote Perch Anita against City, less when it's QPR. Anita isn't as defensive as Perch, even if he played RB at the start of the season, but he surely isn't as attacking minded as Marveaux.