Parky Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Gouffran is an interesting signing. Same age as Remy, probably as fast and scored way more than him this season. Not saying he is better but we have got ourselves a great deal for the price. Massive fuck off to Harry if he outscores Remy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Courtesy of @H_atemBenArfa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Will be fucking great to finally have a pacey striker again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Might see a new player against Villa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Happy New Year to you too! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. And we are back down to earth again, let people have their dreams man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is shit, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakka Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. HTT? Should be OTT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 He could come on as a sub in the 89th minute and start having a shit on the center circle and he still would've contributed more than shola and ranger this season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is s***, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Pathetic. And when this player turns out not to be Messi incarnated.... then what?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is s***, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Pathetic. And when this player turns out not to be Messi incarnated.... then what?! Who mentioned Messi? It is fair to say he can't be worse than Shola, not sure how you can disagree with that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. HTT? Should be OTT. No OTT is the attitude that anyone is better than Shola and worse still that the 'anyone better than' will come in and do the business! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Nah, Shola = Messi. Clearly. There's well documented research on this, but you've got to do your own research, as HTT does not share his. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is s***, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Pathetic. And when this player turns out not to be Messi incarnated.... then what?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is s***, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Pathetic. And when this player turns out not to be Messi incarnated.... then what?! Damn lad, how can you be on a downer today? Is your glass half empty, half full or have you knocked it over? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. So it's not a step in the right direction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is s***, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Pathetic. And when this player turns out not to be Messi incarnated.... then what?! Who mentioned Messi? It is fair to say he can't be worse than Shola, not sure how you can disagree with that He can be and could be. No-one mentioned Messi but the way some people are going on its like "way hay, he's better than Shola get the fuck in and therefore = goals or major contributions". Me, I'm worried that we are signing unknown quantities who will take time to settle to pretty much save us from going down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. Considering Shola is s***, it doesn't take much being a step up from him Pathetic. And when this player turns out not to be Messi incarnated.... then what?! Who mentioned Messi? It is fair to say he can't be worse than Shola, not sure how you can disagree with that He can be and could be. No-one mentioned Messi but the way some people are going on its like "way hay, he's better than Shola get the f*** in and therefore = goals or major contributions". Me, I'm worried that we are signing unknown quantities who will take time to settle to pretty much save us from going down. BUT Shola is a known quantity, that quantity being shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Aren't all new signing unknown 'quantities'? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Sounds like he is a definite step up from Shola so it's a step in the right direction. I hate statements like this. The player hasn't played 1 minute in the Premier League yet and is a totally unknown quantity. He could easily flop or struggle to adapt. If he is bought as Ba's replacement he will need to come in and score goals straight away, and even if he is brought in as a squad player only he will still have to contribute meaningfully. So it's not a step in the right direction? Its a step in the right direction that we are signing players and one of them happens to be a striker/forward but that's not my gripe anyway, its lazy fucking shitty comments like "well anyone's better than Shola" shit that does my head in. I bet those that think along those lines haven't even seen this player play, not in any real depth anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varadi Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Aren't all new signing unknown 'quantities'? Well there's known knowns and known unknowns, but the ones you've really got to watch our for are the unknown knowns. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Who watched him v PSG on ESPN a couple of days ago? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 Aren't all new signing unknown 'quantities'? Hardly a huge gamble given the figures quoted, guess HTT thought we should have gone balls out to get Messi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted January 22, 2013 Share Posted January 22, 2013 GOUFFRAN 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now