Jump to content

2014 FIFA World Cup Brasil™ - Europe vs. America


Recommended Posts

Ridiculous offside decision earlier

 

What happened to "advantage to the attacker"?

 

http://i.imgur.com/znSbWyR.png

 

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

Link to post
Share on other sites

It always annoys me when complain about offside decisions that are so close. It is almost impossible to look at the exact moment a player kicks a ball and look at the defensive line at the same time

Link to post
Share on other sites

It always annoys me when complain about offside decisions that are so close. It is almost impossible to look at the exact moment a player kicks a ball and look at the defensive line at the same time

 

That's why there should be a video review available.  :whistle:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

His head and shoulder are offside

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

 

He's offside because his foot is past the last defender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

 

Any body part you can score with IIRC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

 

He's offside because his foot is past the last defender.

 

That's not the rule though

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's offside because his foot is past the last defender.

 

Technically, looking at the line, his foot is level with the defender who is leaning. It's not strictly feet only for offside, is it?

 

Whatever  :lol: Not even arsed that much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

 

He's offside because his foot is past the last defender.

 

That's not the rule though

 

There you go:

 

http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/worldfootball/clubfootball/01/37/04/27/interpretation_law11_en.pdf

 

It's in the first fucking line :lol:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you're being serious here. He's offside. "Advantage to the attacker" doesn't mean "if the attacker is only a bit offside then it's OK".

 

How is he offside? Their bodies are level. Surely you're not "offside" just because your arm is past the last defender?

 

He's offside because his foot is past the last defender.

 

That's not the rule though

 

No it isn't. It's the law.

 

:hmm:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...