Alan '48 points' Pardew

[Beren]

We need to back up a few pages when this thread was fun. Damn it drops into the monotonous category fast when Captain Dullard spouts up with his "opinion".  You sir take the fun out of everything. . . . Definitely Mr Pardew.

 

 

Whether you plan it to or not, every thread does always end up being about you 

 

I wish I could stop that, believe me.

 

Kill yourself.

 

We were worried about you.

 

[Flip]

Not to but I'm going to do it anyway. This is exactly why N-O should have some sort of social media presence. It's now known as The Mag's story and N-O isn't even mentioned. Not that the article should've been hosted here, but a twitter account could at least point to some to the origins of this 'interview' and draw a few more new posters.

 

Please leave this forum away from that attention. If what I've heard about a lot of fans is true I don't want those types in here. The less exposure the better.

[TRon]

 

Ambush a guy on a night out then use the off-the-record conversation to hammer him in an article? Slightly dodgy IMO, even if you agree with the conclusion.

 

 

Of course.

 

You don't think it's slightly unfair on Elliot?

 

An NUFC employee telling people in public that Keegan is a poor manager, not as good as Pardew and that 8th or 9th is our level? Aye, my heart bleeds. You don't say things like that "in confidence" man. He's as stupid for telling an NUFC fan those views as he is for having them in the first place.

 

Course he is, I never said otherwise. It's just a dodgy way of scoring internet journalist points, that's all.

 

Isn't it a way of trying to spread the word about the utter catastrophe of the current ownership and what it's doing to our club from top to bottom?

 

You could say that, yes. But the principal of how it was done still applies IMO.

 

What principals should the Guv be held to? He's shared the details of a conversation that took place in public. What's wrong with that?

 

I do think hoying them in an article and reporting it like news is a bit far fetched. Should have remained on this place for us to ridicule him. However Ian used it perfectly to his own agenda as usual. Thankfully people are less stupid these days and can see right through him.

 

I don't have any agenda at all, I don't even want to keep Pardew any more. I've no idea why I get such a hard time for it. I disagree with loads of people all the time, but I can still discuss it properly.

 

Why not just have "everything about Ashley, Pardew and NUFC is evil" printed at the top of a blank web page? This is a forum FFS.

 

Perhaps you need to change your 'style' then as you are winding up a lot of people on here by the looks of it with the way you are posting. 1 or 2 people getting wound up then you could say they are being sensitive but when you are antagonising so many people with your comments then it looks like you have an agenda just to be contrary and just to wind people up.

 

But surely you have to question whether the reaction is reasonable? I asked a question about how an article was obtained and here's 3 pages of abuse. That doesn't seem normal to me.

 

There was an implied criticism as to TheGuv's motives for publishing the article too, 'Internet Journalists Points' . That read very poorly.

 

I'm all for these raw encounters with players being relayed. It's all to rare we are able to lift the veil and see what is going on at our club, away from 'the Bishops' influence and insipid Premier League PR. Clearly people can apply their own critical reasoning to the material in question.

 

The reaction you felt is partly down to your focussing on how this information was obtained at the ignorance of what was was said. What was said is a far bigger priority for fans.

 

First, no point was made about what was said, very specifically. Secondly, I think what is a priority for most fans is irrelevant, we're allowed to discuss anything.

 

As for Guv's motives, I don't know them. Maybe it was a purely selfless act to expose how a current Newcastle Utd player wants to stick up for his manager. If so then sorry.

 

See this is why people get annoyed. A snidey remark buried in that for no reason.

 

A snide remark hidden behind apparent debate. 

 

Ok, so he's been well and truly sussed. Let's just get on with discussing what Elliott may have said rather than get sidetracked by him (Where's Trollemache btw?).

 

I'm actually a lot more worried about the club now if even some of the players are believing Pardew's bullsh*t. I'm kind of not surprised that Elliott has bought into it given Pardew brought him in but if some of the others have too then we are well and truly screwed.

 

I'm not that fussed. It's pretty clear that there will be some bog standard players sticking up for Pards because they'd never be at a club this level without him. There'll be plenty of the better ones who think Pardew's clueless, and they'll be off at the first chance they get. It really depends on whether Ashley believes we can survive another season in the premier without a proper manager.

 

How do we know it's not the better players that have bought into it?

 

Well it's just common sense. Why would Ben Arfa want to concentrate on stopping the opposition full back? Why would Gouffran or Sissoko? Why would Anita or Cabaye want the ball launched over their towards a single striker with no one within 30 yards of him?

 

I really hope you are right.

 

I'm sure Ben Arfa doesn't agree with any of it given the reports of a bust-up but what if the likes of Tiote and Coloccini think that it's all about work rate and countering what your opponent does first rather than taking the game to the opposition or using a flair player to his strengths such as, god forbid, attacking their wing back/full back. It may explain why they are reported to have turned on Ben Arfa if all they measure themselves on is 'stats'.

 

Well according to the Mirror, Coloccini had a massive bust up with Pardew after the Stoke game. Other than that, who's to say which players support Pardew? None of them have been playing like they do.

[Hanshithispantz]

Harsh like

 

I've missed The Flasher though.

[LV]

LV

 

Give this man Mike's job.

 

Ha. I'm not being arsey like. I'd just read that as Toon's Taylor saying he knew that the French lot had given up since Cabaye left and were unsettled. I just like to separate fact from opinion so I can understand the situation better.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

LV

 

Give this man Mike's job.

 

Ha. I'm not being arsey like. I'd just read that as Toon's Taylor saying he knew that the French lot had given up since Cabaye left and were unsettled. I just like to separate fact from opinion so I can understand the situation better.

 

I was wondering myself but I was too scared to ask.

[LV]

 

Ambush a guy on a night out then use the off-the-record conversation to hammer him in an article? Slightly dodgy IMO, even if you agree with the conclusion.

 

 

Of course.

 

You don't think it's slightly unfair on Elliot?

 

An NUFC employee telling people in public that Keegan is a poor manager, not as good as Pardew and that 8th or 9th is our level? Aye, my heart bleeds. You don't say things like that "in confidence" man. He's as stupid for telling an NUFC fan those views as he is for having them in the first place.

 

Course he is, I never said otherwise. It's just a dodgy way of scoring internet journalist points, that's all.

 

Isn't it a way of trying to spread the word about the utter catastrophe of the current ownership and what it's doing to our club from top to bottom?

 

You could say that, yes. But the principal of how it was done still applies IMO.

 

What principals should the Guv be held to? He's shared the details of a conversation that took place in public. What's wrong with that?

 

I do think hoying them in an article and reporting it like news is a bit far fetched. Should have remained on this place for us to ridicule him. However Ian used it perfectly to his own agenda as usual. Thankfully people are less stupid these days and can see right through him.

 

I don't have any agenda at all, I don't even want to keep Pardew any more. I've no idea why I get such a hard time for it. I disagree with loads of people all the time, but I can still discuss it properly.

 

Why not just have "everything about Ashley, Pardew and NUFC is evil" printed at the top of a blank web page? This is a forum FFS.

 

Perhaps you need to change your 'style' then as you are winding up a lot of people on here by the looks of it with the way you are posting. 1 or 2 people getting wound up then you could say they are being sensitive but when you are antagonising so many people with your comments then it looks like you have an agenda just to be contrary and just to wind people up.

 

But surely you have to question whether the reaction is reasonable? I asked a question about how an article was obtained and here's 3 pages of abuse. That doesn't seem normal to me.

 

There was an implied criticism as to TheGuv's motives for publishing the article too, 'Internet Journalists Points' . That read very poorly.

 

I'm all for these raw encounters with players being relayed. It's all to rare we are able to lift the veil and see what is going on at our club, away from 'the Bishops' influence and insipid Premier League PR. Clearly people can apply their own critical reasoning to the material in question.

 

The reaction you felt is partly down to your focussing on how this information was obtained at the ignorance of what was was said. What was said is a far bigger priority for fans.

 

First, no point was made about what was said, very specifically. Secondly, I think what is a priority for most fans is irrelevant, we're allowed to discuss anything.

 

As for Guv's motives, I don't know them. Maybe it was a purely selfless act to expose how a current Newcastle Utd player wants to stick up for his manager. If so then sorry.

 

See this is why people get annoyed. A snidey remark buried in that for no reason.

 

A snide remark hidden behind apparent debate. 

 

Ok, so he's been well and truly sussed. Let's just get on with discussing what Elliott may have said rather than get sidetracked by him (Where's Trollemache btw?).

 

I'm actually a lot more worried about the club now if even some of the players are believing Pardew's bullsh*t. I'm kind of not surprised that Elliott has bought into it given Pardew brought him in but if some of the others have too then we are well and truly screwed.

 

I'm not that fussed. It's pretty clear that there will be some bog standard players sticking up for Pards because they'd never be at a club this level without him. There'll be plenty of the better ones who think Pardew's clueless, and they'll be off at the first chance they get. It really depends on whether Ashley believes we can survive another season in the premier without a proper manager.

 

How do we know it's not the better players that have bought into it?

 

Well it's just common sense. Why would Ben Arfa want to concentrate on stopping the opposition full back? Why would Gouffran or Sissoko? Why would Anita or Cabaye want the ball launched over their towards a single striker with no one within 30 yards of him?

 

I really hope you are right.

 

I'm sure Ben Arfa doesn't agree with any of it given the reports of a bust-up but what if the likes of Tiote and Coloccini think that it's all about work rate and countering what your opponent does first rather than taking the game to the opposition or using a flair player to his strengths such as, god forbid, attacking their wing back/full back. It may explain why they are reported to have turned on Ben Arfa if all they measure themselves on is 'stats'.

 

Well according to the Mirror, Coloccini had a massive bust up with Pardew after the Stoke game. Other than that, who's to say which players support Pardew? None of them have been playing like they do.

 

Didn't it also say Colo bollocked Ben Arfa too though?

[TheGuv]

Ambush a guy on a night out then use the off-the-record conversation to hammer him in an article? Slightly dodgy IMO, even if you agree with the conclusion.

 

 

Of course.

 

You don't think it's slightly unfair on Elliot?

 

An NUFC employee telling people in public that Keegan is a poor manager, not as good as Pardew and that 8th or 9th is our level? Aye, my heart bleeds. You don't say things like that "in confidence" man. He's as stupid for telling an NUFC fan those views as he is for having them in the first place.

 

Course he is, I never said otherwise. It's just a dodgy way of scoring internet journalist points, that's all.

 

Isn't it a way of trying to spread the word about the utter catastrophe of the current ownership and what it's doing to our club from top to bottom?

 

You could say that, yes. But the principal of how it was done still applies IMO.

 

What principals should the Guv be held to? He's shared the details of a conversation that took place in public. What's wrong with that?

 

I do think hoying them in an article and reporting it like news is a bit far fetched. Should have remained on this place for us to ridicule him. However Ian used it perfectly to his own agenda as usual. Thankfully people are less stupid these days and can see right through him.

 

I don't have any agenda at all, I don't even want to keep Pardew any more. I've no idea why I get such a hard time for it. I disagree with loads of people all the time, but I can still discuss it properly.

 

Why not just have "everything about Ashley, Pardew and NUFC is evil" printed at the top of a blank web page? This is a forum FFS.

 

Perhaps you need to change your 'style' then as you are winding up a lot of people on here by the looks of it with the way you are posting. 1 or 2 people getting wound up then you could say they are being sensitive but when you are antagonising so many people with your comments then it looks like you have an agenda just to be contrary and just to wind people up.

 

But surely you have to question whether the reaction is reasonable? I asked a question about how an article was obtained and here's 3 pages of abuse. That doesn't seem normal to me.

 

There was an implied criticism as to TheGuv's motives for publishing the article too, 'Internet Journalists Points' . That read very poorly.

 

I'm all for these raw encounters with players being relayed. It's all to rare we are able to lift the veil and see what is going on at our club, away from 'the Bishops' influence and insipid Premier League PR. Clearly people can apply their own critical reasoning to the material in question.

 

The reaction you felt is partly down to your focussing on how this information was obtained at the ignorance of what was was said. What was said is a far bigger priority for fans.

 

First, no point was made about what was said, very specifically. Secondly, I think what is a priority for most fans is irrelevant, we're allowed to discuss anything.

 

As for Guv's motives, I don't know them. Maybe it was a purely selfless act to expose how a current Newcastle Utd player wants to stick up for his manager. If so then sorry.

 

It was

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Ambush a guy on a night out then use the off-the-record conversation to hammer him in an article? Slightly dodgy IMO, even if you agree with the conclusion.

 

 

Of course.

 

You don't think it's slightly unfair on Elliot?

 

An NUFC employee telling people in public that Keegan is a poor manager, not as good as Pardew and that 8th or 9th is our level? Aye, my heart bleeds. You don't say things like that "in confidence" man. He's as stupid for telling an NUFC fan those views as he is for having them in the first place.

 

Course he is, I never said otherwise. It's just a dodgy way of scoring internet journalist points, that's all.

 

Isn't it a way of trying to spread the word about the utter catastrophe of the current ownership and what it's doing to our club from top to bottom?

 

You could say that, yes. But the principal of how it was done still applies IMO.

 

What principals should the Guv be held to? He's shared the details of a conversation that took place in public. What's wrong with that?

 

I do think hoying them in an article and reporting it like news is a bit far fetched. Should have remained on this place for us to ridicule him. However Ian used it perfectly to his own agenda as usual. Thankfully people are less stupid these days and can see right through him.

 

I don't have any agenda at all, I don't even want to keep Pardew any more. I've no idea why I get such a hard time for it. I disagree with loads of people all the time, but I can still discuss it properly.

 

Why not just have "everything about Ashley, Pardew and NUFC is evil" printed at the top of a blank web page? This is a forum FFS.

 

Perhaps you need to change your 'style' then as you are winding up a lot of people on here by the looks of it with the way you are posting. 1 or 2 people getting wound up then you could say they are being sensitive but when you are antagonising so many people with your comments then it looks like you have an agenda just to be contrary and just to wind people up.

 

But surely you have to question whether the reaction is reasonable? I asked a question about how an article was obtained and here's 3 pages of abuse. That doesn't seem normal to me.

 

There was an implied criticism as to TheGuv's motives for publishing the article too, 'Internet Journalists Points' . That read very poorly.

 

I'm all for these raw encounters with players being relayed. It's all to rare we are able to lift the veil and see what is going on at our club, away from 'the Bishops' influence and insipid Premier League PR. Clearly people can apply their own critical reasoning to the material in question.

 

The reaction you felt is partly down to your focussing on how this information was obtained at the ignorance of what was was said. What was said is a far bigger priority for fans.

 

First, no point was made about what was said, very specifically. Secondly, I think what is a priority for most fans is irrelevant, we're allowed to discuss anything.

 

As for Guv's motives, I don't know them. Maybe it was a purely selfless act to expose how a current Newcastle Utd player wants to stick up for his manager. If so then sorry.

 

It was

 

 

You're a better man than me.

[Flip]

Ambush a guy on a night out then use the off-the-record conversation to hammer him in an article? Slightly dodgy IMO, even if you agree with the conclusion.

 

 

Of course.

 

You don't think it's slightly unfair on Elliot?

 

An NUFC employee telling people in public that Keegan is a poor manager, not as good as Pardew and that 8th or 9th is our level? Aye, my heart bleeds. You don't say things like that "in confidence" man. He's as stupid for telling an NUFC fan those views as he is for having them in the first place.

 

Course he is, I never said otherwise. It's just a dodgy way of scoring internet journalist points, that's all.

 

Isn't it a way of trying to spread the word about the utter catastrophe of the current ownership and what it's doing to our club from top to bottom?

 

You could say that, yes. But the principal of how it was done still applies IMO.

 

What principals should the Guv be held to? He's shared the details of a conversation that took place in public. What's wrong with that?

 

I do think hoying them in an article and reporting it like news is a bit far fetched. Should have remained on this place for us to ridicule him. However Ian used it perfectly to his own agenda as usual. Thankfully people are less stupid these days and can see right through him.

 

I don't have any agenda at all, I don't even want to keep Pardew any more. I've no idea why I get such a hard time for it. I disagree with loads of people all the time, but I can still discuss it properly.

 

Why not just have "everything about Ashley, Pardew and NUFC is evil" printed at the top of a blank web page? This is a forum FFS.

 

Perhaps you need to change your 'style' then as you are winding up a lot of people on here by the looks of it with the way you are posting. 1 or 2 people getting wound up then you could say they are being sensitive but when you are antagonising so many people with your comments then it looks like you have an agenda just to be contrary and just to wind people up.

 

But surely you have to question whether the reaction is reasonable? I asked a question about how an article was obtained and here's 3 pages of abuse. That doesn't seem normal to me.

 

There was an implied criticism as to TheGuv's motives for publishing the article too, 'Internet Journalists Points' . That read very poorly.

 

I'm all for these raw encounters with players being relayed. It's all to rare we are able to lift the veil and see what is going on at our club, away from 'the Bishops' influence and insipid Premier League PR. Clearly people can apply their own critical reasoning to the material in question.

 

The reaction you felt is partly down to your focussing on how this information was obtained at the ignorance of what was was said. What was said is a far bigger priority for fans.

 

First, no point was made about what was said, very specifically. Secondly, I think what is a priority for most fans is irrelevant, we're allowed to discuss anything.

 

As for Guv's motives, I don't know them. Maybe it was a purely selfless act to expose how a current Newcastle Utd player wants to stick up for his manager. If so then sorry.

 

It was

 

 

You're a better man than me.

 

http://solutionproblem.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/you-dont-say.png

[Incognito]

We need to back up a few pages when this thread was fun. Damn it drops into the monotonous category fast when Captain Dullard spouts up with his "opinion".  You sir take the fun out of everything. . . . Definitely Mr Pardew.

 

 

Whether you plan it to or not, every thread does always end up being about you 

 

I wish I could stop that, believe me.

 

Kill yourself.

 

 

Oh hi Jack.

 

FFS Now he's trying to get people to commit terrorism!!!

[Rich]

LV

 

Give this man Mike's job.

 

Ha. I'm not being arsey like. I'd just read that as Toon's Taylor saying he knew that the French lot had given up since Cabaye left and were unsettled. I just like to separate fact from opinion so I can understand the situation better.

 

Was just impressed at how you'd got the thread back on topic

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

[Weezertron]

There are some right thick cunts on twitter. Our fans are fucked.

[Ikon]

[Andymc1]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

 

So f***, he slated Kevin Keegan. The bloke shouldn't be allowed back into the city for his remarks.

[TRon]

 

Ambush a guy on a night out then use the off-the-record conversation to hammer him in an article? Slightly dodgy IMO, even if you agree with the conclusion.

 

 

Of course.

 

You don't think it's slightly unfair on Elliot?

 

An NUFC employee telling people in public that Keegan is a poor manager, not as good as Pardew and that 8th or 9th is our level? Aye, my heart bleeds. You don't say things like that "in confidence" man. He's as stupid for telling an NUFC fan those views as he is for having them in the first place.

 

Course he is, I never said otherwise. It's just a dodgy way of scoring internet journalist points, that's all.

 

Isn't it a way of trying to spread the word about the utter catastrophe of the current ownership and what it's doing to our club from top to bottom?

 

You could say that, yes. But the principal of how it was done still applies IMO.

 

What principals should the Guv be held to? He's shared the details of a conversation that took place in public. What's wrong with that?

 

I do think hoying them in an article and reporting it like news is a bit far fetched. Should have remained on this place for us to ridicule him. However Ian used it perfectly to his own agenda as usual. Thankfully people are less stupid these days and can see right through him.

 

I don't have any agenda at all, I don't even want to keep Pardew any more. I've no idea why I get such a hard time for it. I disagree with loads of people all the time, but I can still discuss it properly.

 

Why not just have "everything about Ashley, Pardew and NUFC is evil" printed at the top of a blank web page? This is a forum FFS.

 

Perhaps you need to change your 'style' then as you are winding up a lot of people on here by the looks of it with the way you are posting. 1 or 2 people getting wound up then you could say they are being sensitive but when you are antagonising so many people with your comments then it looks like you have an agenda just to be contrary and just to wind people up.

 

But surely you have to question whether the reaction is reasonable? I asked a question about how an article was obtained and here's 3 pages of abuse. That doesn't seem normal to me.

 

There was an implied criticism as to TheGuv's motives for publishing the article too, 'Internet Journalists Points' . That read very poorly.

 

I'm all for these raw encounters with players being relayed. It's all to rare we are able to lift the veil and see what is going on at our club, away from 'the Bishops' influence and insipid Premier League PR. Clearly people can apply their own critical reasoning to the material in question.

 

The reaction you felt is partly down to your focussing on how this information was obtained at the ignorance of what was was said. What was said is a far bigger priority for fans.

 

First, no point was made about what was said, very specifically. Secondly, I think what is a priority for most fans is irrelevant, we're allowed to discuss anything.

 

As for Guv's motives, I don't know them. Maybe it was a purely selfless act to expose how a current Newcastle Utd player wants to stick up for his manager. If so then sorry.

 

See this is why people get annoyed. A snidey remark buried in that for no reason.

 

A snide remark hidden behind apparent debate. 

 

Ok, so he's been well and truly sussed. Let's just get on with discussing what Elliott may have said rather than get sidetracked by him (Where's Trollemache btw?).

 

I'm actually a lot more worried about the club now if even some of the players are believing Pardew's bullsh*t. I'm kind of not surprised that Elliott has bought into it given Pardew brought him in but if some of the others have too then we are well and truly screwed.

 

I'm not that fussed. It's pretty clear that there will be some bog standard players sticking up for Pards because they'd never be at a club this level without him. There'll be plenty of the better ones who think Pardew's clueless, and they'll be off at the first chance they get. It really depends on whether Ashley believes we can survive another season in the premier without a proper manager.

 

How do we know it's not the better players that have bought into it?

 

Well it's just common sense. Why would Ben Arfa want to concentrate on stopping the opposition full back? Why would Gouffran or Sissoko? Why would Anita or Cabaye want the ball launched over their towards a single striker with no one within 30 yards of him?

 

I really hope you are right.

 

I'm sure Ben Arfa doesn't agree with any of it given the reports of a bust-up but what if the likes of Tiote and Coloccini think that it's all about work rate and countering what your opponent does first rather than taking the game to the opposition or using a flair player to his strengths such as, god forbid, attacking their wing back/full back. It may explain why they are reported to have turned on Ben Arfa if all they measure themselves on is 'stats'.

 

Well according to the Mirror, Coloccini had a massive bust up with Pardew after the Stoke game. Other than that, who's to say which players support Pardew? None of them have been playing like they do.

 

Didn't it also say Colo bollocked Ben Arfa too though?

 

Well he wouldn't be much of a captain if he wasn't prepared to bollock his players. Having a go at your manager is on another level though.

[TheGuv]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

 

Erm, well I posted on here when pissed. Then i stuck the story on here.

 

Peer pressure made me run the story

 

Seriously though. No. If anything I've done is 'unethical'. Fair enough. Ban me from the ground, hound me for it. But I can't be arsed with this club anymore.

 

Anything to bring them down

[Flip]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

 

Erm, well I posted on here when p*ssed. Then i stuck the story on here.

 

Peer pressure made me run the story

 

Seriously though. No. If anything I've done is 'unethical'. Fair enough. Ban me from the ground, hound me for it. But I can't be arsed with this club anymore.

 

Anything to bring them down

 

You're a hero. Next time bring a tape recorder

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

 

So f***, he slated Kevin Keegan. The bloke shouldn't be allowed back into the city for his remarks.

 

We've been through this, I was interested in whether TheGuv had thought about it.

[Deuce]

There are some right thick cunts on twitter. Our fans are fucked.

 

"But Keegan never won Manager of the Season!"

[Andymc1]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

 

So f***, he slated Kevin Keegan. The bloke shouldn't be allowed back into the city for his remarks.

 

We've been through this, I was interested in whether TheGuv had thought about it.

 

You were clearly implying that running with this story was kind of 'wrong'. No doubt you'll come back with 'I never said that'. Of course you didn't, you never actually say anything clearly you just pose a thesis and everyone on here reads it for what it is. When slated for your comments you deny the meaning behind your posts.

[Elliottman]

First caller on total sport 'it would be panicking getting rid of pardew' fml

[KDT]

First caller on total sport 'it would be panicking getting rid of pardew' fml

 

Are they not the only major local media outlet that still has access to the club? For all they deny it I'm sure they don't want to spoil that relationship.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Actually TheGuv, did you not have any second thoughts about running with the story? Bearing in mind he probably thought he was just having a private chat?

 

So f***, he slated Kevin Keegan. The bloke shouldn't be allowed back into the city for his remarks.

 

We've been through this, I was interested in whether TheGuv had thought about it.

 

You were clearly implying that running with this story was kind of 'wrong'. No doubt you'll come back with 'I never said that'. Of course you didn't, you never actually say anything clearly you just pose a thesis and everyone on here reads it for what it is. When slated for your comments you deny the meaning behind your posts.

 

As I said, we've been through this.