Jump to content
[[Template core/global/global/poll is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Recommended Posts

I've always had a feeling that Moyes and Man U just dont fit, he will get to the end of next season tho and by then they could be really average

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett, that season we finished 5th we were ahead of Liverpool. They sacked their manager and appointed one who believed in correct football principles

 

:lol:

 

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year ;)

 

 

 

More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

 

Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route.

 

So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

 

Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett, that season we finished 5th we were ahead of Liverpool. They sacked their manager and appointed one who believed in correct football principles

 

:lol:

 

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year ;)

 

 

 

More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

 

Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route.

 

So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

 

Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose?

 

There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager.

 

I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett, that season we finished 5th we were ahead of Liverpool. They sacked their manager and appointed one who believed in correct football principles

 

:lol:

 

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year ;)

 

 

 

More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

 

Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route.

 

So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

 

Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose?

 

There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager.

 

I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them.

 

So do you have a different interpretation of correct and incorrect then? I'm assuming you do since you LOL'd at mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett, that season we finished 5th we were ahead of Liverpool. They sacked their manager and appointed one who believed in correct football principles

 

:lol:

 

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year ;)

 

 

 

More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

 

Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route.

 

So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

 

Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose?

 

There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager.

 

I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them.

 

So do you have a different interpretation of correct and incorrect then? I'm assuming you do since you LOL'd at mine.

 

As I made clear, it's ridiculously simplistic to use such words. Ironically it's the type of stuff I'd expect in an endorsement of scientific Allardyce-like approach. Bobby went back-to-front plenty during our 4th, 3rd, 5th seasons. Love to see you phrase that as incorrect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett, that season we finished 5th we were ahead of Liverpool. They sacked their manager and appointed one who believed in correct football principles

 

:lol:

 

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year ;)

 

 

 

More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

 

Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route.

 

So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

 

Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose?

 

There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager.

 

I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them.

 

So do you have a different interpretation of correct and incorrect then? I'm assuming you do since you LOL'd at mine.

 

As I made clear, it's ridiculously simplistic to use such words. Ironically it's the type of stuff I'd expect in an endorsement of scientific Allardyce-like approach. Bobby went back-to-front plenty during our 4th, 3rd, 5th seasons. Love to see you phrase that as incorrect.

 

I did it ages ago, in fact I created a thread about how he transitioned from using Duncan Ferguson and Shearer to creating the CL side with Bellamy and Dyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett, that season we finished 5th we were ahead of Liverpool. They sacked their manager and appointed one who believed in correct football principles

 

:lol:

 

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year ;)

 

 

 

More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

 

Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route.

 

So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

 

Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose?

 

There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager.

 

I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them.

 

So do you have a different interpretation of correct and incorrect then? I'm assuming you do since you LOL'd at mine.

 

As I made clear, it's ridiculously simplistic to use such words. Ironically it's the type of stuff I'd expect in an endorsement of scientific Allardyce-like approach. Bobby went back-to-front plenty during our 4th, 3rd, 5th seasons. Love to see you phrase that as incorrect.

 

I did it ages ago, in fact I created a thread about how he transitioned from using Duncan Ferguson and Shearer to creating the CL side with Bellamy and Dyer.

 

What's Duncan Ferguson got to do with finishing 4th, 3rd and 5th under Bobby? And Bobby didn't even sign Dyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalglish was more a cross and big man type as indicated by his flagrant spending on shit.

 

And yet his Liverpool side of 1987-88 is probably the best attacking side and best to watch I've seen.

 

Wonder how many goals John Aldridge would score in the modern era? Just a goal machine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalglish was more a cross and big man type as indicated by his flagrant spending on shit.

 

And yet his Liverpool side of 1987-88 is probably the best attacking side and best to watch I've seen.

 

Wonder how many goals John Aldridge would score in the modern era? Just a goal machine.

 

He had some fairly good service providers that season. ;)

 

But he was immense. I felt Dalglish got it wrong by bringing Rush back and freezing him out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalglish was more a cross and big man type as indicated by his flagrant spending on shit.

 

And yet his Liverpool side of 1987-88 is probably the best attacking side and best to watch I've seen.

 

Wonder how many goals John Aldridge would score in the modern era? Just a goal machine.

 

He had some fairly good service providers that season. ;)

 

But he was immense. I felt Dalglish got it wrong by bringing Rush back and freezing him out.

 

Absolutely. Just seemed to convert chance after chance for them though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...