Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Pata said:

 

Donnarumma, Barella and one or two of the CBs imo.

 

 

Edit. Didn't notice 'squad' but those would be starting.

 

 

 

 

Aye, that's probably fair. Chisea and Verratti too when fit. Not sure about Donnarumma though, think he's been pretty poor since he left Milan and always got a massive error in him.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

playing players that are out of form.

playing players who arent match fit due to lack of game time for their clubs.

playing players out of position.

and just being fucking negative in general.

 

should have got rid after that abomination of a managerial performance in the euros final.

 

 

Edited by huss9

Link to post
Share on other sites

Said at the time he should have gone after the Euros.

 

not because he deserved to be sacked but more that he wouldn’t be able to raise the team again. Like losing the play off final, it’s hard to go again. Players needed a change of voice as well.

 

we’ll get out of the group but quarters max in the WC then he will bow out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

Just had to look up the Nations League format again to see what relegated meant. Fuck me this competition is garbage :lol: 

 

Why? Infinitely better than 100% meaningless friendlies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t like this idea Southgate fluked his way through major tournaments, but you can’t mention his record without acknowledging the opposition. We clearly did get favourable runs in both 2018 and 2020 and every win we had you’d expect on paper, especially as we were virtually the home team in the Euros. Losing to Croatia in 2018 I’m not too disappointed by as they had an insanely good midfield, but that 2020 final at Wembley was really disappointing and Southgate should rightly get criticism for that. 
 

Also for balance I really like what he’s done for the team off the pitch if nothing else - it’s pretty clear he’s had a lot of positive influences on the squad and the fans and their value can’t be underestimated for big tournaments. I just think tactically he’s really poor and as such he’s got a ceiling and won’t take us further.


However, I would happily be proven wrong and hope we’ve lowered expectations so much, that it might help the team somehow go on and win the World Cup…

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Pata said:

 

Why? Infinitely better than 100% meaningless friendlies.

 

Friendlies are at least "known" to be that . . meaningless practice matches.

 

This effectively pointless, unwanted, tournament is trying to be a tournament, but actually ends up meaningless.

 

I prefer the 'honesty' of friendlies, that I can happily ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, manorpark said:

 

Friendlies are at least "known" to be that . . meaningless practice matches.

 

This effectively pointless, unwanted, tournament is trying to be a tournament, but actually ends up meaningless.

 

I prefer the 'honesty' of friendlies, that I can happily ignore.

 

It might seem 100% meaningless to big countries like England but it's pretty important to smaller nations who don't automatically qualify to every tournament. I really don't understand how someone could choose friendlies over the Nations League format.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Pata said:

 

It might seem 100% meaningless to big countries like England but it's pretty important to smaller nations who don't automatically qualify to every tournament. I really don't understand how someone could choose friendlies over the Nations League format.

 

I was talking from our countries (and my own) perspective, and my post says it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the praise he's had and the criticism are both fair. We haven't scored in 500 minutes now. He's picked 12 defenders in a squad lacking creativity, and sticks with the likes of Maguire and Grealish, who can't get a game and are low on confidence, but can't see any place in a big squad for someone like Maddison, who has been in top form for ages and brings attributes the team badly need.

 

I get that you can't always just pick form players or you'd chop and change your XI every time, and you need players you trust to fit into a system. But what kind of message does it send to the group when you clearly have your favourites who have barely kicked a ball all season and walk into your team? I used to like the fact Southgate didn't let the media and fans dictate his selection, but by stubbornly sticking with the same group, it's now too late to call in players who deserve their chance because he "doesn't know them". Maddison for example has 1 cap for England.

 

 

Edited by ohmelads

Link to post
Share on other sites

Far too much turn and return football. Majority of players had the mentality of ‘don’t be the one to lose the ball’, they weren’t working decent passing angles in attack, they played the ball in the final third in ways that ensured the man receiving it would be the one to lose it. Bellingham and at times Foden were the only ones thinking ahead to their second touch to take them forward, the rest knew they were going to instantly shield it and lay it off. 
 

We’ve been told it’s a happy camp, the divides between players are gone, but they either don’t trust the system or don’t trust each other.
 

Kane and Sterling played like they’ve just found the other in bed with their lass. 

 

When does Tomori get his chance if it’s not in his stadium against players he’s most familiar with? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...