Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can someone please compare the shots (including blocked shots, shots on and off target) that West Brom have had against Arsenal compared to our game against Arsenal?

 

Thanks x

 

Check Sky at then end of the match x

 

Then add 10 to the actual number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please compare the shots (including blocked shots, shots on and off target) that West Brom have had against Arsenal compared to our game against Arsenal?

 

Thanks x

 

Check Sky at then end of the match x

 

Then add 10 to the actual number.

 

If you check Flash that is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please compare the shots (including blocked shots, shots on and off target) that West Brom have had against Arsenal compared to our game against Arsenal?

 

Thanks x

 

Check Sky at then end of the match x

 

Then add 10 to the actual number.

 

If you check Flash that is

 

Please refer back to the links I provided showing the stats on both sites, and save the sauce for later.

 

Given the fact that our squad has less quality than Palace's squad, the criticism of Rafa's tactics was harsh considering Palace aren't getting any at all. City had 2 more shots on target against us. Nightmare!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palace have far better players than we do, and while they got a point, the match stats are certainly similar and comparable. Which you seem unable to understand. They had a few more shots, but that's about it.

 

If you think the performance by us and the performance by Palace today was comparable then there is no point in even debating with you.

 

Care to point in the direction of where I've said that? I said the outcome in terms of statistical analysis was comparable. Palace have a better side for us pretty much player for player and as such are far more capable of playing in a different way to we did first 30 minutes, yet at the end of the date the stats of both games turn out very similar. Take your blinkers off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please compare the shots (including blocked shots, shots on and off target) that West Brom have had against Arsenal compared to our game against Arsenal?

 

Thanks x

 

Check Sky at then end of the match x

 

Then add 10 to the actual number.

 

If you check Flash that is

 

Please refer back to the links I provided showing the stats on both sites, and save the sauce for later.

 

Given the fact that our squad has less quality than Palace's squad, the criticism of Rafa's tactics was harsh considering Palace aren't getting any at all. City had 2 more shots on target against us. Nightmare!

 

The two performances were like chalk and cheese if you really can’t see that then that’s your problem. Palace performed like you should against a team like city for 90 minutes and as a result restricted them to a lot less shots on goal. The 2 games are over now if you want to think the two performances were comparable that’s your choice the rest of the country wouldn’t agree though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palace have far better players than we do, and while they got a point, the match stats are certainly similar and comparable. Which you seem unable to understand. They had a few more shots, but that's about it.

 

If you think the performance by us and the performance by Palace today was comparable then there is no point in even debating with you.

 

Care to point in the direction of where I've said that? I said the outcome in terms of statistical analysis was comparable. Palace have a better side for us pretty much player for player and as such are far more capable of playing in a different way to we did first 30 minutes, yet at the end of the date the stats of both games turn out very similar. Take your blinkers off.

 

How is a team having 7 more shots on goal as you want to include blocked shots, hitting the post three times, two good saves, scoring a goal and missing at least 2 more excellent chances and another 3 or 4 you would expect normally for them to hit the target comparable. City created virtually nothing today. Palace were by far more of a threat today also. That pretty much better player by player are still below us in the league so they can’t be that good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palace have far better players than we do, and while they got a point, the match stats are certainly similar and comparable. Which you seem unable to understand. They had a few more shots, but that's about it.

 

If you think the performance by us and the performance by Palace today was comparable then there is no point in even debating with you.

 

Care to point in the direction of where I've said that? I said the outcome in terms of statistical analysis was comparable. Palace have a better side for us pretty much player for player and as such are far more capable of playing in a different way to we did first 30 minutes, yet at the end of the date the stats of both games turn out very similar. Take your blinkers off.

 

How is a team having 7 more shots on goal as you want to include blocked shots, hitting the post three times, two good saves, scoring a goal and missing at least 2 more excellent chances and another 3 or 4 you would expect normally for them to hit the target comparable. City created virtually nothing today. Palace were by far more of a threat today also. That pretty much better player by player are still below us in the league so they can’t be that good.

 

Can you even read? I made a comment on the statistical outcomes being similar. Nothing more.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palace have far better players than we do, and while they got a point, the match stats are certainly similar and comparable. Which you seem unable to understand. They had a few more shots, but that's about it.

 

If you think the performance by us and the performance by Palace today was comparable then there is no point in even debating with you.

 

Care to point in the direction of where I've said that? I said the outcome in terms of statistical analysis was comparable. Palace have a better side for us pretty much player for player and as such are far more capable of playing in a different way to we did first 30 minutes, yet at the end of the date the stats of both games turn out very similar. Take your blinkers off.

 

How is a team having 7 more shots on goal as you want to include blocked shots, hitting the post three times, two good saves, scoring a goal and missing at least 2 more excellent chances and another 3 or 4 you would expect normally for them to hit the target comparable. City created virtually nothing today. Palace were by far more of a threat today also. That pretty much better player by player are still below us in the league so they can’t be that good.

 

Can you even read? I made a comment on the statistical outcomes being similar. Nothing more.

 

 

 

So having 7 more shots is comparable I don’t think so it’s not one or 2 it’s 7 that is not comparable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...