frankpingel Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Surely it'll be as a % of any profit we make on his sale? So probably £1m or so, if anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 44 minutes ago, duo said: Is that true? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Doesn’t matter at all if Atlanta has a sell-on clause or a % of the sale. The fee is what counts for FFP. I doubt the owners are arsed about paying Atlanta Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 5 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Doesn’t matter at all if Atlanta has a sell-on clause or a % of the sale. The fee is what counts for FFP. I doubt the owners are arsed about paying Atlanta Did not realise that. That could be open to abuse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 8 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Doesn’t matter at all if Atlanta has a sell-on clause or a % of the sale. The fee is what counts for FFP. I doubt the owners are arsed about paying Atlanta sorry I don’t think that’s quite true. lets say for simplicity the fee is 100 but 25% goes to Atlanta. We’d only be able to show 75 as our income from the sale and Atlanta will take the other 25 we May take the full 100 in cash but we’d have to sent the 25 straight out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, Colos Short and Curlies said: sorry I don’t think that’s quite true. lets say for simplicity the fee is 100 but 25% goes to Atlanta. We’d only be able to show 75 as our income from the sale and Atlanta will take the other 25 we May take the full 100 in cash but we’d have to sent the 25 straight out I can see I wasn’t clear, apologies - it doesn’t matter what we pay Atlanta; whatever fee we retain is 100% profit for FFP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 10 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: I can see I wasn’t clear, apologies - it doesn’t matter what we pay Atlanta; whatever fee we retain is 100% profit for FFP. Sure about this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, Displayname said: Sure about this? Yes, Almiron’s fee has been fully amortised. It’s as if he’s an academy product. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 6 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Yes, Almiron’s fee has been fully amortised. It’s as if he’s an academy product. If we have to pay, say £4m to Atlanta because they're owed it as part of a clause, does that not go down the same as a £4m signing for instance? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 7 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Yes, Almiron’s fee has been fully amortised. It’s as if he’s an academy product. From an accounting perspective the fee we have to pay to Atlanta would have to come as a cost/reduced income this year i would think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt1892 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 As someone else has said, any sell on clause will be on the profit we make on him which isn’t going to be much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, Matt1892 said: As someone else has said, any sell on clause will be on the profit we make on him which isn’t going to be much. Ahh, so it only comes into effect if we sell him for more than what we bought him for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt1892 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, Displayname said: Ahh, so it only comes into effect if we sell him for more than what we bought him for? That is how sell on clauses usually work, the Athletic article they take it from say it will be on any profits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 7 minutes ago, Matt1892 said: That is how sell on clauses usually work, the Athletic article they take it from say it will be on any profits. Makes sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 31 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: If we have to pay, say £4m to Atlanta because they're owed it as part of a clause, does that not go down the same as a £4m signing for instance? It would be zero sum, as there would be £4m incoming then £4m outgoing, so it would be cost neutral for any sell-on clause. Almiron’s original fee is amortised fully, so anything we’re not paying Atlanta goes straight into the income column. Selling Almiron would likely help fund a big signing in this window - if they want to do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Waugh talks well this morning about Miggy on the TF Podcast - 25 mins in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 12 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Waugh talks well this morning about Miggy on the TF Podcast - 25 mins in. Anything interesting ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 37 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Anything interesting ? Nothing spectacularly. Saudi been over talking to a number of clubs, discussed players with NUFC, interest from number of clubs in Miggy, nothing agreed but someone (BEIN Jacobs) jumped ahead. Player unaware. So nothing really more than us as a fan base have stitched together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagMal Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 So peg leg is staying? He has been great for the last season and a half but I would expect him to be moved on in the summer if we are looking to improve as a team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: Yes, Almiron’s fee has been fully amortised. It’s as if he’s an academy product. Thats incorrect, he signed a new contract after 4 years of his 5 1/2 year deal so the remaining amortisation is then spread over the new contract, Miggys book value is about around £4.1m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, nufcnick said: Thats incorrect, he signed a new contract after 4 years of his 5 1/2 year deal so the remaining amortisation is then spread over the new contract, Miggys book value is about around £4.1m. Great, let's give everyone new 10 year contracts as soon as they sign and spread out that FFP! Yeah, that isn't right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Hhtoon said: Great, let's give everyone new 10 year contracts as soon as they sign and spread out that FFP! Yeah, that isn't right. Yeah It is exactly right, that’s how it’s worked for over a decade , feel free to check up yourself in-fact here you go I will do the work for you Edited January 25 by nufcnick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) 1 hour ago, nufcnick said: Yeah It is exactly right, that’s how it’s worked for over a decade , feel free to check up yourself in-fact here you go I will do the work for you Before or after the "Chelsea" loophole was closed, and they restricted contract length to 5 years for FFP? Edit - that's a genuine Q by the way as I'd be surprised if that wasn't dealt with at the same time... Edited January 25 by Hhtoon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Hhtoon said: Before or after the "Chelsea" loophole was closed, and they restricted contract length to 5 years for FFP? Edit - that's a genuine Q by the way as I'd be surprised if that wasn't dealt with at the same time... Before and After, it’s never changed, it’s restricted to 5 years but there is nothing stopping a club renewing a contact every year. Edited January 25 by nufcnick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now