Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 24/10/2022 at 07:52, Dokko said:

Exactly why it needs to be done again. 

 

I think we'll be doing it for the villa game, our home game. Still, missed opportunity and attracted criticism when a simple image or a retweet of the PLs would have sufficed.

 

Play the game...(It's all that it is, all this is token gestures and virtue signalling) no club actually cares about anything but themselves and £££...which is another conversation, however, we need to be doing it more than others due to what's behind our curtain.

Expand  

Last two pages of this thread are hunting for a reason to be critical IMHO.   Very strange. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 24/10/2022 at 08:04, Awaymag said:

Last two pages of this thread are hunting for a reason to be critical IMHO.   Very strange. 

Expand  

We’re owned by the public investment fund of a country where homosexuality is punishable with the death penalty.  We’re also the only PL side which didn’t take part in a ludicrously easy exercise to support LGBTQI+ players and supporters.  This is one of those moments where the criticism seems pretty reasonable to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 24/10/2022 at 08:14, TheBrownBottle said:

We’re owned by the public investment fund of a country where homosexuality is punishable with the death penalty.  We’re also the only PL side which didn’t take part in a ludicrously easy exercise to support LGBTQI+ players and supporters.  This is one of those moments where the criticism seems pretty reasonable to me. 

Expand  

and if they do it at our home game vrs Aston Villa........then what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 24/10/2022 at 08:14, TheBrownBottle said:

We’re owned by the public investment fund of a country where homosexuality is punishable with the death penalty.  We’re also the only PL side which didn’t take part in a ludicrously easy exercise to support LGBTQI+ players and supporters.  This is one of those moments where the criticism seems pretty reasonable to me. 

Expand  

 

Liverpool didn't tweet, did they? Again they were away from home, so might be waiting till then. If so then the Only difference is the PL showed a pic of milne with his band on, and omitted to post trippiers. That simply could be down to our late kick off.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 24/10/2022 at 08:20, Dokko said:

 

Liverpool didn't tweet, did they? Again they were away from home, so might be waiting till then. If so then the Only difference is the PL showed a pic of milne with his band on, and omitted to post trippiers. That simply could be down to our late kick off.

 

 

Expand  

Yep, forgot about LFC.  Poor from them too - hopefully they’re also waiting for the weekend. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 24/10/2022 at 08:21, TheBrownBottle said:

Yep, forgot about LFC.  Poor from them too - hopefully they’re also waiting for the weekend. 

Expand  

 

On 1st glance it looks extremely poor from us. When you dig a bit it seems to be more around timing than anything else. However due to our ownership it looks bad from the off, and IMHO, should have been anticipated from the off.

 

We did it last year. Ladies have done it. PL may have stitched us up here with no representation due to timings, club could have took it in their own hands and made their own statement now and bigger one for villa. 

 

Until the villa game I think we have to reserve judgement. Still, entirely avoidable situation and the club in its new professional capacity should have seen it coming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...