Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 27/02/2024 at 16:54, Mills and Boon said:
Expand  

No idea. Maybe using different accounting periods. Kieran is usually accurate and posted that today based on Arsenal's latest accounts. Most clubs haven't released their accounts for 2023 I think so it will change further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:14, Mills and Boon said:

Aye he's good the Swiss Ramble fella, which makes me doubt the other sources, but there's a load of them and they're not that old either 

Expand  

 

There are huge mitigating factors this season, so if we're the 7th highest payers and end up the 9th highest team then I'm not going to feel it's a significant underperformance personally.  And I still think with a fair wind we'll have a run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:15, BonesJones said:

Assuming this has a lot to do with our midfield just getting bypassed, but that's atrocious.

RDT_20240227_1710571179390454698985127.jpg

Expand  

Not just the midfield but also the more forward 3 not being able to press in the same way due to knowing they have to manage the full game as opposed to giving it all for 70 and being subbed.

 

 

 

 

Edited by madras

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:17, Interpolic said:

 

There are huge mitigating factors this season, so if we're the 7th highest payers and end up the 9th highest team then I'm not going to feel it's a significant underperformance personally.  And I still think with a fair wind we'll have a run.

Expand  

 

I'd be interested to see how many of the 7th highest paid players have actually been available this season. If the likes of Tonali, Pope, Wilson, Willock etc were playing then I reckon we might be sitting higher than 9th right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:27, timeEd32 said:

For comparison, this is before Everton and with Pope.

 

If you extend it through the Forest game, the midpoint of the season, we were 6th in xGA and 1st in xG. 

Screen Shot 2024-02-27 at 12.18.32 PM.png

Expand  

 

The Forest game was when Botman came back and we've not looked right since. Not putting all the blame on him mind but his return and struggle for form has coincided with the midfield being overrun and Burn's tough spell.

 

I've got faith we'll sort it out and finish strong

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:17, Interpolic said:

 

There are huge mitigating factors this season, so if we're the 7th highest payers and end up the 9th highest team then I'm not going to feel it's a significant underperformance personally.  And I still think with a fair wind we'll have a run.

Expand  

The next closest are Everton & Leicester.

 

We spend a good 30%+ more on wages compared to West Ham, Brighton & Wolves.

 

The defence: Pope, Joe's, midfield gap, lack of midfield legs, opps working out Burn is a weakness and I'm sure other things - have all contributed to what is by far the worst defence in the league atm. No 1 single factor will turn a top 3 defence in the league over a season, to the worst in the league over a  6-12 game period.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:41, BoSelecta said:


Give over man, you’re twisting reality to suit your narrative. The quality of the players you bring on in a cup final doesn’t make a difference. Utter twoddle.

Expand  

 

That’s just so untrue really. Not sure if you watched the game but the substitutions made changed the flow of the game. That was down to the fresh legs, not the quality, as others have pointed out he bought on youngsters for established quality players.

 

But each to their own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:42, The College Dropout said:

The next closest are Everton & Leicester.

 

We spend a good 30%+ more on wages compared to West Ham, Brighton & Wolves.

 

The defence: Pope, Joe's, midfield gap, lack of midfield legs, opps working out Burn is a weakness and I'm sure other things - have all contributed to what is by far the worst defence in the league atm. No 1 single factor will turn a top 3 defence in the league over a season, to the worst in the league over a  6-12 game period.

 

 

Expand  

 

It won't, but without the initial absentees through injury and suspension, we don't get the subsequent fatigue, soft tissue injuries, exacerbated midfield gap or exposed defence.

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 17:47, Big Jow said:

 

That’s just so untrue really. Not sure if you watched the game but the substitutions made changed the flow of the game. That was down to the fresh legs, not the quality, as others have pointed out he bought on youngsters for established quality players.

 

But each to their own.

Expand  

Why didn’t Chelsea’s fresh legs work then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/02/2024 at 19:54, Shearergol said:

Why didn’t Chelsea’s fresh legs work then?

Expand  

 

That’s just exaggerating the point really, isn’t it?

 

Not every substitution will work, but Klopp’s did at the weekend and it was clear an increased energy and workrate supported the change in the dynamics of the game.

 

Also noting Chelsea made much fewer substitutions at that stage in the game, but I’m assuming you know that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...