Jump to content

Do you still back Eddie Howe?  

735 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes
      117
    • No
      92


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

 

There will be an element of selling to fund buys undoubtedly, but our squad is also pretty full so we need to sell/release for headcount as much as revenue 

 

 

Well we might need to sell a player or two just to fund their replacements. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

we don't have to worry about UEFA next season

That doesn't mean they won't sanction us in a later season if we don't comply. Villa and Chelsea for example both have conditions they have to meet over three and four years respectively.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kilcline said:

That doesn't mean they won't sanction us in a later season if we don't comply. Villa and Chelsea for example both have conditions they have to meet over three and four years respectively.

 

 

Yep. We really need to get away from this "we'll fix this later down the line" mentality. It cost us Anderson and Minteh already, and while it looked fabulous for Chelsea two years ago, if they continue to slide, it will come back to bite them on the arse. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kilcline said:

That doesn't mean they won't sanction us in a later season if we don't comply. Villa and Chelsea for example both have conditions they have to meet over three and four years respectively.

They can't sanction us if we're not in the competitions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The College Dropout said:

They can't sanction us if we're not in the competitions.

No, but we are actively trying to qualify for Europe either finishing in a relevant league position or by winning trophies, aren't we? At least I assume that's a core objective of the playing side of the football club, I'd certainly hope so, given the time and financial investment I and many others make into it every year. So I'm not sure flipping the bird at UEFA's rules or ignoring a settlement we make now and taking an approach of "we don't need to worry about it now" is going to be a viable strategy. Nor is it one I'd imagine the club plans to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kilcline said:

No, but we are actively trying to qualify for Europe either finishing in a relevant league position or by winning trophies, aren't we? At least I assume that's a core objective of the playing side of the football club, I'd certainly hope so, given the time and financial investment I and many others make into it every year. So I'm not sure flipping the bird at UEFA's rules or ignoring a settlement we make now and taking an approach of "we don't need to worry about it now" is going to be a viable strategy. Nor is it one I'd imagine the club plans to take.

We aren't going to regularly qualify for Europe and win trophies, sticking to the laws with ease perfectly all the time.

 

Villa will have 5 years of European football consecutively. To do so they've breached the rules, come close to breaching and pulled magic tricks to make it work. That's what it's going to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

We aren't going to regularly qualify for Europe and win trophies, sticking to the laws with ease perfectly all the time.

 

Villa will have 5 years of European football consecutively. To do so they've breached the rules, come close to breaching and pulled magic tricks to make it work. That's what it's going to take.

 

 

That's great if everything falls in place. Smart signings, great coaching and competent leadership from the top. If you don't have all those then it can easily turn into the shitshow we saw last summer which can set you back two years. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

We aren't going to regularly qualify for Europe and win trophies, sticking to the laws with ease perfectly all the time.

 

Villa will have 5 years of European football consecutively. To do so they've breached the rules, come close to breaching and pulled magic tricks to make it work. That's what it's going to take.

We haven't stuck to the laws "with ease perfectly all the time" though, that's why we're negotiating a settlement with UEFA, are going to pay a fine, and are presumably going to agree to go along with whatever the terms of the settlement and the rules are.

 

We've breached the rules, I assume we've therefore also come close to breaching the rules before, but unfortunately we seem to have pulled our stadium magic trick after UEFA closed the selling your own assets to yourself loophole, but that's another conversation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way out of this is to start developing the kids quickly.
The youth teams have made progress.
2 youngsters a year into the first team.
I think Yasir understands this.
However, I think Eddie prefers a trusted Murphy to blooding Park Seung-Soo.
If Anderson and Minteh were with the club now, would they be playing regularly?
I'm not so sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rabster said:

The only way out of this is to start developing the kids quickly.
The youth teams have made progress.
2 youngsters a year into the first team.
I think Yasir understands this.
However, I think Eddie prefers a trusted Murphy to blooding Park Seung-Soo.
If Anderson and Minteh were with the club now, would they be playing regularly?
I'm not so sure.

Anderson, yes.

Minteh... also not so sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Yeah, I think it's a myth that Anderson wouldn't have gotten enough minutes to develop. Howe liked him, and he was already playing a lot when he wasn't injured. If he kept getting the minutes that he did apart from injury, then his development wouldn't have been strangled at all. You don't need to start every single game to be able to develop quickly. Andersons excellent form started already in the first few months at Forest, right after we sold him. They were impressed right from the start, before they even had time to give him all those minutes that people claim was the difference maker.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Rabster said:

The only way out of this is to start developing the kids quickly.
The youth teams have made progress.
2 youngsters a year into the first team.
I think Yasir understands this.
However, I think Eddie prefers a trusted Murphy to blooding Park Seung-Soo.
If Anderson and Minteh were with the club now, would they be playing regularly?
I'm not so sure.

 

Watch quite a bit of the U21s due to just living down the track from Whitley Park and Park Seung-Soo is nowhere near good enough for the 1st team on what I've seen of him.

 

I do think both Anderson and Minteh would have had good game time this season. It's the 1st season since Bruno arrived that he's had injury problems and a long spell out. Joelinton has had injury problems as well so this season the opportunities would have been there but he would have been a year behind as he wouldn't have got many minutes last season which is when he started to make his name.

 

Suspect Minteh would have also played quite a bit this season as he would arguably have been our best winger if he'd still been here.

 

Agree with your other points. We definitely do have to put more into the development of younger players. It's more important than ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Erikse said:

Yeah, I think it's a myth that Anderson wouldn't have gotten enough minutes to develop. Howe liked him, and he was already playing a lot when he wasn't injured. If he kept getting the minutes that he did apart from injury, then his development wouldn't have been strangled at all. You don't need to start every single game to be able to develop quickly. Andersons excellent form started already in the first few months at Forest, right after we sold him. They were impressed right from the start, before they even had time to give him all those minutes that people claim was the difference maker.

 

 

 

 

 

Anderson excelled on his loan spell at Bristol Rovers and immediately following his move to Forest. The only place he struggled was here, and that was because he didn't really fit the 4-3-3 system we were using at the time as he ended up playing wide where he wasn't great. 

 

For all Eddie loved him as a player, he couldn't really play him where he would excel. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

PSR means Man City can’t stack the deck vs their rivals - they’ve just been better run

 

They can go out and sign two goalkeepers, one of our targets who now sits on the bench. They can sign a player for 35 million who we offered 70 for two years ago. Whoever they want, they get. We get the leftovers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rabster said:

The only way out of this is to start developing the kids quickly.
The youth teams have made progress.
2 youngsters a year into the first team.
I think Yasir understands this.
However, I think Eddie prefers a trusted Murphy to blooding Park Seung-Soo.
If Anderson and Minteh were with the club now, would they be playing regularly?
I'm not so sure.

image.png.b44ccf8d90045baf4a414c4b4c79cfa6.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

PSR means Man City can’t stack the deck vs their rivals - they’ve just been better run

Man City have spent 750m euros in 3 years. They have the highest wage bill in the league and top 3 in Europe.

 

They also have a top 3 academy in England and a top 10 academy in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NUFC91 said:

Said it at the weekend but heading into the season with expectations of happily finishing 8th isn't good enough.

 

In the last few years there's been clubs with far less investment achieved better than that. 

 

I mean for your last sentence, we have been one of those clubs under Howe. Outside of the "big six", there's only Villa that have matched our ability to outperform our wage bill. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's getting pretty tiresome reading all the cheap jibes and PFM suggestions in every single thread, there's some extreme revisionism going on in order to suit a narrative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/05/2026 at 14:30, Mills and Boon said:

Anderson was getting decent time before he was sold. Minteh would have got the minutes Elanga has had as we wouldn't have bought him

Are there stats to back that up? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, duo said:

Are there stats to back that up? 

 

3 league starts in 22/23 and 10 league starts in 23/24. Down to interpretation if you think that's enough to establish yourself in the team I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...