NSG Posted June 16 Share Posted June 16 14 minutes ago, Ankles Bennett said: I thought the release clause was inserted in case Barcelona or Real Madrid wanted Bruno. That was what the quote suggested. Talked about “dream clubs” and I’m sure Ashworth mentioned they were abroad. Anyway, if this is going to happen we may well see movement this week because Copa America starts later this week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Well we do. Thank you next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallumG6 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Pay up or shut up. He'll have Champions League football and be surrounded by the best talent in the world at City, but one thing he won't have is the absolute adulation from the fans the way he does with us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sushimonster85 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 6 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Always thought this would be the way teams would try to play it. Try and unsettle him so he actively pushes leave, which then leads to a better negotiating position for said team. Fortunately (please god) Bruno doesn't seem to the type who agitates. All the noises from his camp have been very "I'm happy to stay, if the release clause is activated then who knows." Do think this likely means there is either a lower release clause in the deal for next Summer if we don't get CL. Or some form of verbal agreement that we won't stand in his way if we're not in CL and reasonable bid comes in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Just now, CallumG6 said: Pay up or shut up. He'll have Champions League football and be surrounded by the best talent in the world at City, but one thing he won't have is the absolute adulation from the fans the way he does with us. And with their fans he won’t be able to reciprocate it. It’s a love story. He stays 🖤🤍 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upthemags Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 140 million or city can do one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Set to be considered if he asks to leave, but not rated enough to buy. Awesome tweet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Only 2 weeks left of this nonsense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Let’s hope once the Copa America kicks off he decides he doesn’t want any distractions and turns his phone off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 I think Tripps will leave and Bruno will be made captain or vice captain at the very least. He's a sentimental bugger.. he'll love that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 47 minutes ago, astraguy said: Only 2 weeks left of this nonsense The speculation, if anything, will ramp up once the clause is no longer in effect, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 City should really just go after Zubimendi who is a deep lying playmaker type and has a 50m release clause apparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 At least the club has controll after this month. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 6 minutes ago, Yorkie said: The speculation, if anything, will ramp up once the clause is no longer in effect, imo. How come? Because then more teams may be in the frame? Especially late in the window? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 5 minutes ago, gbandit said: How come? Because then more teams may be in the frame? Especially late in the window? Some clubs may think when the clause expires that he can be had for less and my guess is the media will be more than happy to fuel this. The reality is I don't think there's any chance we'd consider an offer meaningfully below the clause unless Bruno was kicking up a fuss to leave. And I think the only scenario where that happens is if Madrid or Barcelona are genuinely interested. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 5 minutes ago, timeEd32 said: Some clubs may think when the clause expires that he can be had for less and my guess is the media will be more than happy to fuel this. The reality is I don't think there's any chance we'd consider an offer meaningfully below the clause unless Bruno was kicking up a fuss to leave. And I think the only scenario where that happens is if Madrid or Barcelona are genuinely interested. 100% this, offer 75m threaten to walk away. Convince Bruno to push for a move. Leaves us in a bad position Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 (edited) 11 minutes ago, 1964 said: 100% this, offer 75m threaten to walk away. Convince Bruno to push for a move. Leaves us in a bad position I'm quite sure that Newcastle won't accept any bid under £100 million and I'm also quite sure Bruno won't push for a move. I think we're in total control and that's why any deal set up has a limited time period Edited June 17 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 From 1st July other clubs aren’t limited by FFP for the current season. I don’t think the speculation will end until the window closes. I also think it’s likely that Bruno stays as I don’t think anyone will offer what we’d likely want and he’s unlikely at the moment to agitate for a move - he isn’t a £100m footballer, and I’d be surprised if we got a bid for that amount. The clause would have been set at that amount and agreed by the club because it outstrips their valuation of him - you don’t agree to automatic release clauses under or equal to the amount that you think a player is worth to you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, et tu brute said: I'm quite sure that Newcastle won't accept any bid under £100,000 and I'm also quite sure Bruno won't push for a move. I think we're in total control and that's why any deal set up has a limited time period Totally agree. Would be madness 😉 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Just now, Coffee_Johnny said: Totally agree. Would be madness 😉 Aye very true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 Clubs don’t get it…We’re no longer owned by Ashley. Like with Ashworth, pay up or you don’t get him, we’re no longer soft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 31 minutes ago, gbandit said: How come? Because then more teams may be in the frame? Especially late in the window? Because the clause gives us the cojones to say "£100m or get lost." It's an aspirational figure from our point of view. It's highly likely teams start testing our (and the player's) resolve once that is out of the picture imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 11 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: From 1st July other clubs aren’t limited by FFP for the current season. I don’t think the speculation will end until the window closes. I also think it’s likely that Bruno stays as I don’t think anyone will offer what we’d likely want and he’s unlikely at the moment to agitate for a move - he isn’t a £100m footballer, and I’d be surprised if we got a bid for that amount. The clause would have been set at that amount and agreed by the club because it outstrips their valuation of him - you don’t agree to automatic release clauses under or equal to the amount that you think a player is worth to you. If Grealish, Fernandez and Caicedo were 100million then Bruno is at least that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 8 minutes ago, madras said: If Grealish, Fernandez and Caicedo were 100million then Bruno is at least that. Fernandez and Caicedo were utterly insane transfers by a club throwing money about like it was going out of fashion. Grealish’s passport accounts for a fair mark-up. Perhaps a club will be crackers enough to bid £100m+ for Bruno. I doubt it though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now