SteV Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 Not bringing this up as a defence of the club (although it’s going to come across like that…), but in that TF interview, Silverstone said something along the lines of ‘digital ticketing normally takes six months to implement, and we’re trying to do it in six weeks’. Now, firstly, they’ve probably had more than six weeks, and even ignoring that, it begs the question, why not just wait until next season? However, it leads me to believe that some (not all) of the decisions taken have been done so out of necessity to get something in place, rather than being as calculated and hard-nosed as some of us fear. Maybe I’m being overly generous there, and the proof either way will be in how things evolve going forward, but if you were struggling for something to be optimistic about following the last few days, that might be something to cling on to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 (edited) If you want to replace your website, back office systems and come up with a new customer management system you would be thinking at least a year, if not longer. Many questions about why they decided to go ahead with such a half-baked solution. But I guess it came from good intentions of trying to improve things. What happens from now remains to be seen. Whoever decided on the random price allocation though, has displayed a fundamental lack of understanding about who is buying tickets and what their needs might be. That is still worrying to me. Edited August 3, 2023 by AyeDubbleYoo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 10 hours ago, SteV said: As per Paully‘s post, Silverstone says is this interview we’ve sold over 50k memberships (that’s how I take what he’s said anyway, is there another interpretation?), which is an incredible number IMO, certainly more than I expected, even if it’s a bit less than the Twitter ITK’s claimed, and not quite Burnsie’s 200k+. 50,000 members at £37 is just under £2m/year. That £35k/week should cover Bruno's new contract. I always try to think of Keegan's speech at Shearer's unveiling "That's your season tickets, the money you spend at the club shop...etc". We can debate whether this is all too much too soon (and in my opinion the price increases this season are too much) but I can at least believe that they're doing it with the genuine intention of increasing revenue to improve the club, specifically the playing squad (which, due to FFP, we can't do without increasing revenue). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 8 minutes ago, SteV said: Not bringing this up as a defence of the club (although it’s going to come across like that…), but in that TF interview, Silverstone said something along the lines of ‘digital ticketing normally takes six months to implement, and we’re trying to do it in six weeks’. Now, firstly, they’ve probably had more than six weeks, and even ignoring that, it begs the question, why not just wait until next season? However, it leads me to believe that some (not all) of the decisions taken have been done so out of necessity to get something in place, rather than being as calculated and hard-nosed as some of us fear. Maybe I’m being overly generous there, and the proof either way will be in how things evolve going forward, but if you were struggling for something to be optimistic about following the last few days, that might be something to cling on to. A bit blunt but I think 'never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity' really rings true here. They've fucked the ticketing process from beginning to end this summer. I'm sure if they wanted to be callous they could've done it in much more efficient ways that didn't cause the uproar this has. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 (edited) If money was the only aim they could’ve just upped the prices and kept the queue. Edited August 3, 2023 by AyeDubbleYoo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 1 hour ago, Groundhog63 said: Another day of "want want want" ? What a strange take Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 He was excellent btw Silverstone that is. Only bone of contention I had was his FFP but I totally understand why he said that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 19 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: 50,000 members at £37 is just under £2m/year. That £35k/week should cover Bruno's new contract. I always try to think of Keegan's speech at Shearer's unveiling "That's your season tickets, the money you spend at the club shop...etc". We can debate whether this is all too much too soon (and in my opinion the price increases this season are too much) but I can at least believe that they're doing it with the genuine intention of increasing revenue to improve the club, specifically the playing squad (which, due to FFP, we can't do without increasing revenue). You’re right, Keegan did say that - but back then match day revenue and club shop income represented the majority of a club’s income. That’s why we were able to compete under our own steam. Once the broadcasts became international, and sponsorships and commercials driven by foreign markets, it skewed everything completely. The ‘Sky Six’ are in reality ‘the international six’ - they have revenue streams off the charts compared to other clubs because of their draw overseas. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 18 minutes ago, The Prophet said: What a strange take Aye, I'm just an ordinary Joe and not an uberfan tho. "We just want a team that tries" lmao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 36 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Problem is the likelihood of getting in. Would you rather sit in the gallowgate or leazes or not go at all? I think the next step will be selecting multiple price brackets, but the only real solution is picking your own seat. I'd genuinely rather watch it in the pub than go in the Leazes End. Used to hate it in there. Loads of people moaning and whining. I would come away depressed even after we'd won half the time. Was a soul destroying experience in there at times. If it's a changed place these days then fair enough. I exclude the NE corner from any criticism as it always looks lively in there and I'd be happy to sit in that particular section. Think I mentioned on here about my Level 7 experience v Southampton in the Semi Final last season. Only place we could get tickets for. The pub beforehand was brilliant, walking to the ground you could feel the excitement, got to our seats and it was so so flat. People sat playing on their phones only half interested in the match and zero atmosphere. I'd have enjoyed myself more if I'd stayed in the pub amd watched it there. We left our seats on 75 mins and walked down and around to the Gallowgate and as the gates were already open just walked in and stood in the Corner and watched the rest of the game from there which was a totally different experience. It actually felt like being at a completely different match. It hit home how much being in the right part of the ground for you can decide whether you enjoy yourself or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 8 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: Aye, I'm just an ordinary Joe and not an uberfan tho. "We just want a team that tries" lmao It's a thread about the membership scheme, in which people are making suggestions about how a new and pretty rudimentary system could be improved. I'm not really sure what your point is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrone Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 I'm sure I had read that members were also going to be able to buy cup packages, cant see anything now, I may have just made that up So are we guessing it will be the same "ballot" format for them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
llcoolc157 Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 38 minutes ago, The Prophet said: It's a thread about the membership scheme, in which people are making suggestions about how a new and pretty rudimentary system could be improved. I'm not really sure what your point is. I was under the impression that forums were created to encourage discussion and debate and allow people to voice opinion… whether you agree is neither here nor there…. Not sure what the definition of ‘Uber fan’ is or the reason behind the ‘oooh look at me I’m just an ordinary joe’ comment… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 54 minutes ago, The Prophet said: It's a thread about the membership scheme, in which people are making suggestions about how a new and pretty rudimentary system could be improved. I'm not really sure what your point is. Aye, ha, when does an "opinion" become a "point" ? There's a lot of self appointed uberfans bleating on about access they feel they're entitled to being stifled by the club. The club, seemingly, intent on sharing the love, to a wider audience. (*) This entitlement, as seen on this thread, permeates many others as well. It started almost straight after the takeover. From an albeit minority, an outcry to bin 20+ "deadwood" & buy (insert any number of £80m players) instantly. 1st Jan window in fact. From then to now. Bin Wilson, Burn's shit, Crap window, Im a better fan than you, Club's shafting us blah blah fucking blah. Boo hoo fucking hoo ? "We only want a team that tries" my arse Caulkin summed it up succinctly, tbf. Recognised that the sad thing, possibly the only sad thing, to come from last season's amazing efforts was it was all achieved with a high degree of innocence and naivety. No matter how we do going forward that feeling will never be the same again. Just an observation, opinion NOT a point ? * ps not suggesting the club can't make mistakes but they're from a good place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 7 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: There's a lot of self appointed uberfans bleating on about access they feel they're entitled to being stifled by the club. What's your evidence for this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydazzla Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: Aye, ha, when does an "opinion" become a "point" ? There's a lot of self appointed uberfans bleating on about access they feel they're entitled to being stifled by the club. The club, seemingly, intent on sharing the love, to a wider audience. (*) This entitlement, as seen on this thread, permeates many others as well. It started almost straight after the takeover. From an albeit minority, an outcry to bin 20+ "deadwood" & buy (insert any number of £80m players) instantly. 1st Jan window in fact. From then to now. Bin Wilson, Burn's shit, Crap window, Im a better fan than you, Club's shafting us blah blah fucking blah. Boo hoo fucking hoo ? "We only want a team that tries" my arse Caulkin summed it up succinctly, tbf. Recognised that the sad thing, possibly the only sad thing, to come from last season's amazing efforts was it was all achieved with a high degree of innocence and naivety. No matter how we do going forward that feeling will never be the same again. Just an observation, opinion NOT a point ? * ps not suggesting the club can't make mistakes but they're from a good place. You don't have to be a self appointed uberfan to be concerned that to have a chance of watching your team you will firstly have to pay £37 and be lucky enough to "win" via a ballot, but then won't actually be given the opportunity to choose your own seat from what is available and pay the relevant price. That's just the fundamental basics of event management and every other sporting and entertainment venue that hosts high demand events seems to be able to manage it, apart from NUFC. Edited August 3, 2023 by bobbydazzla Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 1 minute ago, bobbydazzla said: You don't have to be a self appointed uberfan to expect that when "winning" the chance to watch your team via a ballot, you will then actually be given the opportunity to choose your own seat from what is available and pay the relevant price. That's just the fundamental basics of event management and every other sporting and entertainment venue that hosts high demand events seems to be able to manage it, apart from NUFC. Fucking crybaby. Thought you just wanted a team that tries? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hovagod Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 15 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: Aye, ha, when does an "opinion" become a "point" ? There's a lot of self appointed uberfans bleating on about access they feel they're entitled to being stifled by the club. The club, seemingly, intent on sharing the love, to a wider audience. (*) This entitlement, as seen on this thread, permeates many others as well. It started almost straight after the takeover. From an albeit minority, an outcry to bin 20+ "deadwood" & buy (insert any number of £80m players) instantly. 1st Jan window in fact. From then to now. Bin Wilson, Burn's shit, Crap window, Im a better fan than you, Club's shafting us blah blah fucking blah. Boo hoo fucking hoo ? "We only want a team that tries" my arse Caulkin summed it up succinctly, tbf. Recognised that the sad thing, possibly the only sad thing, to come from last season's amazing efforts was it was all achieved with a high degree of innocence and naivety. No matter how we do going forward that feeling will never be the same again. Just an observation, opinion NOT a point ? * ps not suggesting the club can't make mistakes but they're from a good place. You’re conflating two entirely separate things here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydazzla Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, wormy said: Fucking crybaby. Thought you just wanted a team that tries? I'd like a ticketing department at NUFC that tries Edited August 3, 2023 by bobbydazzla Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 13 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: Aye, ha, when does an "opinion" become a "point" ? There's a lot of self appointed uberfans bleating on about access they feel they're entitled to being stifled by the club. The club, seemingly, intent on sharing the love, to a wider audience. (*) This entitlement, as seen on this thread, permeates many others as well. It started almost straight after the takeover. From an albeit minority, an outcry to bin 20+ "deadwood" & buy (insert any number of £80m players) instantly. 1st Jan window in fact. From then to now. Bin Wilson, Burn's shit, Crap window, Im a better fan than you, Club's shafting us blah blah fucking blah. Boo hoo fucking hoo ? "We only want a team that tries" my arse Caulkin summed it up succinctly, tbf. Recognised that the sad thing, possibly the only sad thing, to come from last season's amazing efforts was it was all achieved with a high degree of innocence and naivety. No matter how we do going forward that feeling will never be the same again. Just an observation, opinion NOT a point ? * ps not suggesting the club can't make mistakes but they're from a good place. Opinion, point, whatever. I don't necessarily disagree on the transfer front though. Folks suggesting a system that (unintentionally) excludes fans from certain financial demographics from attending games they otherwise could have attended, could be improved on doesn't seem like a manifestation of entitlement though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 6 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Opinion, point, whatever. I don't necessarily disagree on the transfer front though. Folks suggesting a system that (unintentionally) excludes fans from certain financial demographics from attending games they otherwise could have attended, could be improved on doesn't seem like a manifestation of entitlement though. "ps not suggesting the club can't make mistakes but they're from a good place." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 1 hour ago, TheBrownBottle said: You’re right, Keegan did say that - but back then match day revenue and club shop income represented the majority of a club’s income. That’s why we were able to compete under our own steam. Once the broadcasts became international, and sponsorships and commercials driven by foreign markets, it skewed everything completely. The ‘Sky Six’ are in reality ‘the international six’ - they have revenue streams off the charts compared to other clubs because of their draw overseas. Of course they do, and that's why we're trying to compete at every possible level we can. It takes a long time to build the overseas draw, it takes a lot less to ramp up the Membership & ticket prices. To repeat myself, I think they've gone too far with the price rises this season. But I do believe it's the same idea (in principle) as the Keegan/Shearer thing, the aim is to increase revenue to improve the playing squad rather than to line the pockets of the owners. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 20 minutes ago, Yorkie said: What's your evidence for this? ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 8 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: Feels more like standard bad planning than 4D chess to me. It's called the door in the face or rejection then retreat method. Governments and companies do it all the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 7 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: ? A compelling case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now