The Butcher Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Arsenal fans feeeewwwwming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Think yellow is fair tbh. Going away from the goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 (edited) On 20/10/2024 at 15:35, KingArthur said: It certainly was not offside. Maybe a foul on Sa, but even that would have been ridiculously cheap foul to give. He cannot be in an offside position before ball hits Stones' head. And when it does he is 5 feet away and dodging. Expand He obstructs the goalkeeper. That for me is impacting play. Based on modern rules for offside, he is well out the way when the ball is headed and I can see why it was given, but for me, the modern rules are shite and it should just be if you're offside - you're offside. He has impacted the goalkeeper and thus impacted play. So I could also see why Wolves will feel aggrieved. The fact there's even discussion about it is mad as a ruling. It should be objective not subjective. Edited October 20, 2024 by Heron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Would love a player like Lavia for us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:40, Heron said: He obstructs the goalkeeper. That for me is impacting play. Based on modern rules for offside, he is well out the way when the ball is headed and I can see why it was given, but for me, the modern rules are shite and it should just be if you're offside - you're offside. He has impacted the goalkeeper and thus impacted play. So I could also see why Wolves will feel aggrieved. The fact there's even discussion about it is mad as a ruling. It should be objective not subjective. Expand He does not obstruct the keeper when he the offside could happen. When Stones heads the ball, he is far away. If offside is given like that you wish for, then the City player giving the corner was in offside also.. And usually teams just put a defender in front of the keeper so that blocking doesn't happen. When the corner is taken, he is not offside, so only a foul on keeper could be given. Is that really a foul? Sa is not protesting at all... They were checking if he was in line of sight of the keeper. That is why the goal was not given first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:40, Heron said: He obstructs the goalkeeper. That for me is impacting play. Based on modern rules for offside, he is well out the way when the ball is headed and I can see why it was given, but for me, the modern rules are shite and it should just be if you're offside - you're offside. He has impacted the goalkeeper and thus impacted play. So I could also see why Wolves will feel aggrieved. The fact there's even discussion about it is mad as a ruling. It should be objective not subjective. Expand They didn't seem aggrieved at the time tbf, I don't think a single one of them even approached the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:50, Keegans Export said: They didn't seem aggrieved at the time tbf, I don't think a single one of them even approached the ref. Expand I know but in a corner there's that much going on I can see why they might not at the time. I just see why O'Neil would be pissed off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:49, KingArthur said: He does not obstruct the keeper when he the offside could happen. When Stones heads the ball, he is far away. If offside is given like that you wish for, then the City player giving the corner was in offside also.. And usually teams just put a defender in front of the keeper so that blocking doesn't happen. When the corner is taken, he is not offside, so only a foul on keeper could be given. Is that really a foul? Sa is not protesting at all... They were checking if he was in line of sight of the keeper. That is why the goal was not given first. Expand He obstructs him getting put his six yard box. So that is by definition obstruction. Agree on the defending. Historically that would have been given offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Didn't think much of it at first but after that replay I think Trent is a lucky boy not to give away a pen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:54, Heron said: He obstructs him getting put his six yard box. So that is by definition obstruction. Agree on the defending. Historically that would have been given offside. Expand If he stands still that is not a foul. He takes 1 step back so that could be given as a foul, but usually in games a lot worse blocks don't get looked twice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 That's a pen tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 These cheap ‘fouls’ that refs give to the defending team… It’s a pandemic this weekend if this game and ours are anything to go by. Jota went through 2-3 minutes ago. James dives after a delayed reaction and the ref gives the foul. Bullshit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Liverpen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 To think I didn't want Madueke at the beginning of the last transfer window He looks great Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:43, janpawel said: Would love a player like Lavia for us Expand Would just play him in a flat 3 and do a bit of everything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Ref must've got the message Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo2 Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Liverpool slinging themselves over left and right, were always going to get one of them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:57, El Prontonise said: That's a pen tbh. Expand Not sure about that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 On 20/10/2024 at 15:59, Robbo2 said: Liverpool slinging themselves over left and right, were always going to get one of them Expand Salah should have been booked for diving few minutes ago when he went down in the box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe1984 Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Jackson! 🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Not perfect but that's a proper pen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Poor from Jones for the offside goal. Took an age to release it to Salah. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Edgar Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 Tosin looks pony. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginola14 Posted October 20, 2024 Share Posted October 20, 2024 funny how Chelsea's midfield duo today Caicedo and Lavia could've easily been Liverpool's but for Chelsea's billions also how have Chelsea gone from having one of the biggest shirt sponsorship deals in the world to nothing in two seasons now? and how can they afford to continue not having one? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now