Bimpy474 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Someone 'Show That Tosser' the exit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, Bimpy474 said: Yeah that's a fair point. Would they win it with Klopp still there? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe1984 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago No one in the PL would even look at Salah says Carragher. Didn't he used to play for Chelsea? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Joe1984 said: No one in the PL would even look at Salah says Carragher. Didn't he used to play for Chelsea? I think everyone has at some point to be honest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe1984 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Gawalls said: I think everyone has at some point to be honest 🤣🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Gawalls said: Would they win it with Klopp still there? Well the way City are currently, and the way everyone keeps tripping up, i think they might have done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Bimpy474 said: Well the way City are currently, and the way everyone keeps tripping up, i think they might have done. There’s always a might but I think Arsenal would have had a better shout if he was still there, who knows. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Makes you wonder if the city players know more about the future of the club than everyone else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, La Parka said: Makes you wonder if the city players know more about the future of the club than everyone else. Or they’ve mentally checked out - thinking about their next sunny all year round home in Madrid or wherever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Gawalls said: There’s always a might but I think Arsenal would have had a better shout if he was still there, who knows. Klopp's points tally at this stage last season had them sat third, they would still be 3 points clear at the top with the same return this season. I think Slot has improved them as a team, but the massive lead they have is more down to the drop off from the others. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago (edited) Liverpool overpowered Man Citeh today - was only gonna be one winner from the off. It's annoying that Sky consider almost the title to be a forgone conclusion, mind! Lot of football still to be played. Edited 7 hours ago by Big Geordie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Not sure spending lots of money can be equated to doping in cycling but it is a funny image nonetheless Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) City will probably start picking up points from now with the easier fixtures. Probably not like winning every game as they used to, but it's unthinkable that they keep going like this much longer. Edited 4 hours ago by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Maximin Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, Astroblack said: Unpopular weird opinion here for some reason. People would rather city win as it would render the season “null and void”. Yeah, doesn’t make sense to me either. Thought this for ages. People don’t like the ‘red cartel’ clubs because of ‘the fans’, when at least they have enough fans to always comfortably fill a stadium. And if people don’t like them, they will be far less annoying when they’re actually winning stuff, hence why no one has as big an issue with Man City fans. I don’t remember it unbearable when Liverpool won the league in 2020. Plus as a neutral it’s really boring seeing the same team win every year. And City might also be a bit corrupt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, St. Maximin said: Thought this for ages. People don’t like the ‘red cartel’ clubs because of ‘the fans’, when at least they have enough fans to always comfortably fill a stadium. And if people don’t like them, they will be far less annoying when they’re actually winning stuff, hence why no one has as big an issue with Man City fans. I don’t remember it unbearable when Liverpool won the league in 2020. Plus as a neutral it’s really boring seeing the same team win every year. And City might also be a bit corrupt. Nah they were actually ecstatic when City won four in a row six league cups in a row and all those FA Cups. Cause it’s “null and void” they loved it. Fuck newcastle might aswell support City because if we come second, who cares? Its null and void. city won and that means nothing except we dont get a trophy or anything. Null and void. Lets go city. Fuck up Arne. I was Pep to win so we can have ANOTER shit season watching City steamroll teams because “at least it’s not Liverpool” a team who sold a 150 pound player to progress their squad. That’s not how it should be done. It should be straight money, no selling, pile up the players and let them steamroll the rest of us because at least it’s not Liverpool who have been shit for 30 years and cost us a league 25 years ago in a one off game with integrity nah. City because it means nothing. What’s the point of even watching then? City for the FA cup. City for the Prem. Fuck Salah and all the work he’s done, the improvements in Gravenbergh, the new style of play. Let's go city so this season means fuck all. All abroad the city train. Hope Salah breaks his leg, TAA breaks his back and Van Dijk gets shot in the spine because City. If they win, we all win, right? fuckers. Edited 1 hour ago by Astroblack Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Astroblack said: Nah they were actually ecstatic when City won four in a row six league cups in a row and all those FA Cups. Cause it’s “null and void” they loved it. Fuck newcastle might aswell support City because if we come second, who cares? Its null and void. city won and that means nothing except we dont get a trophy or anything. Null and void. Lets go city. Fuck up Arne. I was Pep to win so we can have ANOTER shit season watching City steamroll teams because “at least it’s not Liverpool” a team who sold a 150 pound player to progress their squad. That’s not how it should be done. It should be straight money, no selling, pile up the players and let them steamroll the rest of us because at least it’s not Liverpool who have been shit for 30 years and cost us a league 25 years ago in a one off game with integrity nah. City because it means nothing. What’s the point of even watching then? City for the FA cup. City for the Prem. Fuck Salah and all the work he’s done, the improvements in Gravenbergh, the new style of play. Let's go city so this season means fuck all. All abroad the city train. Hope Salah breaks his leg, TAA breaks his back and Van Dijk gets shot in the spine because City. If they win, we all win, right? fuckers. Are you okay? You do know people are allowed to think differently to you Liverpool winning isn't an issue for you but for those that it is there will be reasons for it, reasons which aren't any more or less valid than yours I don't mind Liverpool winning it now so much since Klopp has left but the role that club has played in keeping us down is a factor for the dislike, plus knowing arrogant and obnoxious Liverpool fans in real life is a factor too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Geordie Ahmed said: Are you okay? You do know people are allowed to think differently to you Liverpool winning isn't an issue for you but for those that it is there will be reasons for it, reasons which aren't any more or less valid than yours I don't mind Liverpool winning it now so much since Klopp has left but the role that club has played in keeping us down is a factor for the dislike, plus knowing arrogant and obnoxious Liverpool fans in real life is a factor too At least Liverpool are a real club who even to get to THIS POINT, had to go through 30 years of shit. Sure they got a couple trophies along the way but not the one they wanted and they won the UCL ffs. Liverpool to me are a REAL football club. Man City were born in 2008 and are basically a cybernetic program. It’s not real. It’s fucking Terminator. This is a blip for City, they’ll be back next year with 400 new signings selling their youth to the likes of Southampton to fund big money deals. It’s just not fair. They’ve fucked up the Premier League, something I really respected, admired. I get it, it’s capitalism but they went overboard and gave everyone else no chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Astroblack said: At least Liverpool are a real club who even to get to THIS POINT, had to go through 30 years of shit. Sure they got a couple trophies along the way but not the one they wanted and they won the UCL ffs. Liverpool to me are a REAL football club. Man City were born in 2008 and are basically a cybernetic program. It’s not real. It’s fucking Terminator. This is a blip for City, they’ll be back next year with 400 new signings selling their youth to the likes of Southampton to fund big money deals. It’s just not fair. They’ve fucked up the Premier League, something I really respected, admired. I get it, it’s capitalism but they went overboard and gave everyone else no chance. It depends on when you start looking at things, Liverpool got big investment, it was just a long time ago so the amounts of money seem insignificant but they got money pumped in, there just wasn't any rules in place and that's what allowed them to become a "real" football club, same for Arsenal and the same for Man U. I find this idea that they are somehow these organic football clubs quite laughable, all had big investments which allowed them to become "real" football clubs and build their success on the back of it. At least Man City don't pretend, they are what they are because of money being pumped in. Those "real" clubs are no different but they pretend otherwise and the real nauseating bit is they are the ones that are stopping others from having a chance. The very Premier League you really respected and admired was created on the back of the greed of Liverpool, Man U and Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Geordie Ahmed said: It depends on when you start looking at things, Liverpool got big investment, it was just a long time ago so the amounts of money seem insignificant but they got money pumped in, there just wasn't any rules in place and that's what allowed them to become a "real" football club, same for Arsenal and the same for Man U. I find this idea that they are somehow these organic football clubs quite laughable, all had big investments which allowed them to become "real" football clubs and build their success on the back of it. At least Man City don't pretend, they are what they are because of money being pumped in. Those "real" clubs are no different but they pretend otherwise and the real nauseating bit is they are the ones that are stopping others from having a chance. The very Premier League you really respected and admired was created on the back of the greed of Liverpool, Man U and Arsenal. Be honest, which Premier League did you enjoy more? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said: It depends on when you start looking at things, Liverpool got big investment, it was just a long time ago so the amounts of money seem insignificant but they got money pumped in, there just wasn't any rules in place and that's what allowed them to become a "real" football club, same for Arsenal and the same for Man U. I find this idea that they are somehow these organic football clubs quite laughable, all had big investments which allowed them to become "real" football clubs and build their success on the back of it. At least Man City don't pretend, they are what they are because of money being pumped in. Those "real" clubs are no different but they pretend otherwise and the real nauseating bit is they are the ones that are stopping others from having a chance. The very Premier League you really respected and admired was created on the back of the greed of Liverpool, Man U and Arsenal. Every club has money pumped in but the way City do it is OTT I say this all the time but a squad player to Man U was Kieran Richardson. A squad player to Man City is 45£ Matius Nunes. That is plain not fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Astroblack said: Be honest, which Premier League did you enjoy more? I enjoyed it in the 90's but that's more because that's when I grew up as well as us competing for the title for a few years I disliked it during the Ashley years so much prefer it now to then but dislike it now because of how shit FFP/PSR and all those bollocks have made it And it's Liverpool/Man U/Arsenal that have pushed for those rules and made football about spreadsheets and accountancy jargon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Astroblack said: Every club has money pumped in but the way City do it is OTT I say this all the time but a squad player to Man U was Kieran Richardson. A squad player to Man City is 45£ Matius Nunes. That is plain not fair. Well a squad player to Man U right now is £85m Antony Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted 58 minutes ago Share Posted 58 minutes ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said: Well a squad player to Man U right now is £85m Antony no agree, their integrity has dropped 100 fold and they’re just trying to be City mkII. hard get behind them post fergie. i guess it’s just a new Premier League and either get behind it or get left behind it. Tough pill to swallow but here I am. but I ain’t supporting City cept in the CL. We need the co efficients Edited 56 minutes ago by Astroblack Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now