Scoot Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Nottingham post? I think we need a player like MGW and I think he has a big ceiling that Howe would be perfect in developing further. It’s huge money though and is it a priority position now? Probably not, but they’ve shown they’ll make deals for young players who will improve when they’re available. It sounds like the kind of transfer we’ll do Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, Scoot said: That’s just from an opinion piece on their site. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 I'd be shocked if we or anyone gets him for £42m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwebbo Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Ben Jacob’s now saying …. Understand there is now a verbal agreement between Al-Shabab and Newcastle for Miguel Almiron. However, Al-Shabab are yet to go to the player side.?? sorry don’t know how to add the tweet properly. How reliable is he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isaksbigrightfoot Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 3 hours ago, toontownman said: Honestly have zero idea how the next week and a half is going to pan out. We could sell three huge players, maybe more? Sell no players, bring in 3 players, bring in none. Can't even say for sure what position we will bring in! What a mental end to arguably the most boring first half of a window in years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, oldtype said: Maybe it's the masochistic NUFC fan in me but I think it would be a lot less fun if we could just spend infinite money every window. It's a good thing that ownership is being forced to think about building sustainably and growing the club's commercial infrastructure instead of just going out and buying Robinho. The Saudis (hopefully) won't be there to bankroll everything forever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 24 minutes ago, Scoot said: £42m would be a cracking deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 8 minutes ago, Dwebbo said: Ben Jacob’s now saying …. Understand there is now a verbal agreement between Al-Shabab and Newcastle for Miguel Almiron. However, Al-Shabab are yet to go to the player side.?? sorry don’t know how to add the tweet properly. How reliable is he? Quite reliable tbf. He was the one that broke all the Almiron stuff yday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isaksbigrightfoot Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 4 minutes ago, Danh1 said: Quite reliable tbf. He was the one that broke all the Almiron stuff yday. A lot on here saying he’s bullshit mate. Im not so sure. The smoke is too thick. And although I love Miggy for 30 million this would open doors. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 I'm dubious, however I was also dubious for Gordon, so what the fuck do I know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrymac1966 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Signed a young City midfielder today who is a pretty prolific according to stats....nice to keep thinking of the future as well as the present. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sushimonster85 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 My hype levels for Gibbs-White are way higher than they were for Gordon this time last year. Obvs Gordon has more than proven himself. Think Gibbs-White would be class. Technically sound, creative, but with a bit of bite about him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Feel like Gibbs-White lacks the pace and composed finishing to be a truly top level player in that forward role. However put him amongst better players and he may look even better to be fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmesy Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 34 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said: I'd be shocked if we or anyone gets him for £42m £42m plus what they still owe us for Chris Wood could be nearer £50m, which would see them doubling their money, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 13 minutes ago, Isaksbigrightfoot said: A lot on here saying he’s bullshit mate. Im not so sure. The smoke is too thick. And although I love Miggy for 30 million this would open doors. Fairs, wouldn’t probably go off others tbf but my only real memory of him was that he was accurate during the takeover. As it wasn’t what we wanted to hear though, people said he was shite and hated him. (I may or may not have been blocked on my old account) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Tin foil hat here but the more I think of it, the more the Gibbs-White story seems to be a goer. Ordinarily, he’d be going for a lot more than what were rumoured to be bidding and any number of clubs could be in for him at a higher fee.. so why deal with us? That Chris Wood fee, or what they owe us for it could be the difference between being in or out of the FFP limit. So say we revisit that deal and restructure it. There’s the incentive, staying in the premier league is worth a hell of a lot more than getting an extra 20 million for a top prospect after you’ve been relegated. (Or a sale that only counts for next years accounts) The FFP dilemma is a two way street of course and we’re close to the limit, but maybe enough wiggle room to write off what’s owed on that particular deal? Getting the premier league to re-evaluate Forests accounts would probably be tough though and that’s where NDM comes in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Marinakis is an absolute nut job and a welcome addition to the Barclays so anything is possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 As well have Spurs have done. They’ve won1 trophy in 25 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 53 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said: Tin foil hat here but the more I think of it, the more the Gibbs-White story seems to be a goer. Ordinarily, he’d be going for a lot more than what were rumoured to be bidding and any number of clubs could be in for him at a higher fee.. so why deal with us? That Chris Wood fee, or what they owe us for it could be the difference between being in or out of the FFP limit. So say we revisit that deal and restructure it. There’s the incentive, staying in the premier league is worth a hell of a lot more than getting an extra 20 million for a top prospect after you’ve been relegated. (Or a sale that only counts for next years accounts) The FFP dilemma is a two way street of course and we’re close to the limit, but maybe enough wiggle room to write off what’s owed on that particular deal? Getting the premier league to re-evaluate Forests accounts would probably be tough though and that’s where NDM comes in? They may be in FFP trouble this season too. We don’t yet know what the ‘double dip’ punishment is liable to be. I don’t think the Wood deal can be restructured to fix FFP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 MGW for anything less than £50m seems like a bargain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Are we doing that thing again where we overate a player because he has a good game against us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nine Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) At the same time we shouldn’t totally judge a player from select data in a below average, inconsistent team. He was voted their player of the season for 22/23 also. Edited January 24 by Nine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Nine said: At the same time we shouldn’t totally judge a player from select data in a below average, inconsistent team. He was voted their player of the season for 22/23 also. Absolutely we shouldn’t, it’s just one of the factors to consider right? We will be paying a premium for him and we can’t afford errors. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Feels like something weird going on there with the pool he's being compared to. It's not hard to find lots of promising stats for him. He was in Wyscout's 2022/23 U23 team of the season with Haaland, Saka, Martinelli, Willock, Botman, etc. "The Forest talisman ranks highest among U23 players across Europe’s Top 5 leagues for expected assists (9.86) and aerial duels (199), as well as being second for smart passes (46) and fourth for key passes (26)." Also this (players eliminated by a dribble or pass): Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now