Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

Tbh I don’t think 2 or 3 players signed will be enough, I was hoping for at least 3 1st team players and a couple for the bench. We still need to replace the players we’ve sold 

 

 

Edited by JoeyBartoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, et tu brute said:


No he can't, you need players who are actually fit to play, not another injury ridden player. Sorry, but it's unreal that you and others are even thinking he would be acceptable, even as 3rd choice 

Well of course we need to take that into account. But Osula as a Isak backup is not an option at all. 

DCL playes 26 games last season, (yea, only 1600 minutes in PL) and 32 before that.
23/24 he played 100 minutes less than Isak. I don't think everyone is calling Isak "injury ridden player"

Yes, I don't think he is by no means a perfect player, but we have to get GK, RCB, RW and most likely a CM with very limited budget. Getting a 2nd or 3rd striker for free is not a worst possible move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sweee said:

Xavi Simons and Elanga and its a decent window

Is it fuck, talk about a downplaying of what we actually need due to our whimpering impact in the transfer market so far.
 

That leaves no cover for midfield with Joelinton missing a third of each of the last two seasons, no right sided replacement centre half for an ageing Schar and no challenge for Pope. This for another 8 games minimum against high quality opposition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isak and DCL both missed 21 games each through injury over the last two seasons according to that transfer market site. Not included are the games Isak might as well have missed since January because he was very injured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Well of course we need to take that into account. But Osula as a Isak backup is not an option at all. 

DCL playes 26 games last season, (yea, only 1600 minutes in PL) and 32 before that.
23/24 he played 100 minutes less than Isak. I don't think everyone is calling Isak "injury ridden player"

Yes, I don't think he is by no means a perfect player, but we have to get GK, RCB, RW and most likely a CM with very limited budget. Getting a 2nd or 3rd striker for free is not a worst possible move.


A striker of quality, and who is able to either replace Isak or support him to a high level is an absolute must. Osula is the 3rd choice and DCL is nowhere near a second choice player. I honestly can't understand people's thinking. His injury record and scoring record over the last four seasons is not of the standard we need. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ellis H said:

Isak and DCL both missed 21 games each through injury over the last two seasons according to that transfer market site. Not included are the games Isak might as well have missed since January because he was very injured.


Since January stop talking shite will you

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sweee said:

Xavi Simons and Elanga and its a decent window


Xavi Simmons is apparently on 200k a week and they paid 60m for him. Don’t see that as a realistic target at all.

 

 

Edited by McCormick

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, McCormick said:


Xavi Simmons is apparently on 200k a week and they paid 60m for him. Don’t see that as a realistic target at all.

 

 

 

 

No chance he's on that much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...