Coffee_Johnny Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, Aiston said: Rather not see him on the bench at all then. Just bring the kids on instead of having to risk Livramento in case of emergency. ? for whose benefit are you sharing this managerial wisdom? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Just now, Coffee_Johnny said: ? for whose benefit are you sharing this managerial wisdom? How fucking dare I discuss football on a football forum.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny Green Balls Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Wonder if there would be any “why are we risking him” if Howe threw him on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Just now, Aiston said: How fucking dare I discuss football on a football forum.... It’s the content not the process, that is hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Coffee_Johnny said: ? for whose benefit are you sharing this managerial wisdom? No one will ever learn to have a bit of humility man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Just now, Coffee_Johnny said: It’s the content not the process, that is hilarious. Then ignore it then instead of acting a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 4 minutes ago, huss9 said: missed the first part of the game. what was the set up and formation? who started where? Bad. Murphy Kraft Schar Burn But we played more of a back 3 with Andersson covering LB. Murphy right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Aiston said: Then ignore it then instead of acting a cunt. Then keep it to yourself rather than showing you’re a fool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 15 minutes ago, buzza said: They pressed the life out of us. Defence was not capable of getting the ball out of our half, very slow passing and turning. Their front line looked dangerous every time they had the ball. Their full backs werenso aggressive (clyne and muñoz). They played better and we had no response Always worried anytime we play a team that presses well this season and has a lot of energy in midfield. Only Bruno can deal with it really. Longstaff is so depressingly poor in those situations and so we struggle to then really get going. Anderson is still going to have his ups and downs as a younger guy, so can't be too upset with him. We miss having Joelinton's strength to hold off players and carry the ball in there so much. Willock's ball carrying also has been missed in there. Just been a lot of managing through this issue so much of this season. It has sucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Just now, Dan Gleebals said: Bad. Murphy Kraft Schar Burn But we played more of a back 3 with Andersson covering LB. Murphy right. was expecting krafth schar burn hall before the team was announced. and then our usual 433. but couldnt really tell what the formation was when i started watching. all over the place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon No9 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 5 minutes ago, huss9 said: missed the first part of the game. what was the set up and formation? who started where? No one knows? Not even the players, they looked uninspired and lost today! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Eddie really confuses me with his starting LB choices. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 It was worse watching it live. Hall should have started with Kraft or Murphy at RB, although neither played well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, Dan Gleebals said: It was worse watching it live. Hall should have started with Kraft or Murphy at RB, although neither played well. I was hoping for that, but wonder if he wanted Murphy’s pace and energy against Eze? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, huss9 said: Eddie really confuses me with his starting LB choices. LB needs sorting this summer/early next season, no fucking about. If he rates Targett then use him as the steady Eddie and blood Hall in too. If not ship Targett out and get an experienced LB in with Hall as the rotating LB. I like Burn but sick to god of seeing him at LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Kudos to the new Palace manager. Seems they got a good one. His 3-4-2-1 works well, and they are getting more and more comfortable playing it. He's getting the best out of their better players already too, and Mateta, who has always had some great physical tools, is now being unlocked in a better setup. Eddie sticking with the Spurs setup to match their 3 at the back system was probably the right shout, however, we shouldn't have done so without actual wing backs. Murphy and Anderson dropping into those positions defensively didn't work going against a proper 3-4-2-1 and a manager who uses this tactic all the time and specializes in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancrate1892 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Well that was shit. 2 games I hate, Bournemouth away and palace away, tight pitches and we never seem to do well at either. If palace had 15 men on the pitch I'd believe it. Well beaten Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 9 minutes ago, huss9 said: was expecting krafth schar burn hall before the team was announced. and then our usual 433. but couldnt really tell what the formation was when i started watching. all over the place. It was the same setup as against Spurs. Out of possession Krafth, Schar and Burn as a back three, Murphy and Anderson at wing back and Longstaff and Bruno in midfield. Barnes, Isak and Gordon forward three. In possession more of a 4-3-3, with the front three staying the same, Anderson coming into midfield with Longstaff and Bruno and a back back four of Murphy, Krafth, Schar and Burn. We were switching between the two depending on whether we were in or out of possession. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Just now, KaKa said: It was the same setup as against Spurs. Out of possession Krafth, Schar and Burn as a back three, Murphy and Anderson at wing back and Longstaff and Bruno in midfield. Barnes, Isak and Gordon forward three. In possession more of a 4-3-3, with the front three staying the same, Anderson coming into midfield with Longstaff and Bruno and a back back four of Murphy, Krafth, Schar and Burn. We were switching between the two depending on whether we were in or out of possession. krafth is a better RB than CB. BDB is a better CB than a LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 4 minutes ago, huss9 said: krafth is a better RB than CB. BDB is a better CB than a LB. It's a hybrid system not a fixed one. Didn't work tonight as it needed some changes based on the Palace team we went against. Worked a treat against Spurs though, so not as straight forward as player A and player B being better in a certain position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancrate1892 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 These cunts will come to st James' next season and look like a pub team again Not a good ground for us historically Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrymac1966 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 6 minutes ago, Dan Gleebals said: Bad. Murphy Kraft Schar Burn But we played more of a back 3 with Andersson covering LB. Murphy right. We had a back four who couldnt pass an accurate ball to our players upfield...no quality from them all goals and chances came from inaccuracy from those four. Burns and Schar especially tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 2 hours ago, Big Geordie said: Bad night at the office all round - we just didn't get going. Palace played really well and got to give credit where it's due. Aye - they were well worth that win. Had our measure all game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Saw the highlights whilst eating my breakfast, looked pretty grim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 I picked a good match to completely avoid it seems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now