Marc Guehi

[Joelinton7]

2 minutes ago, BottledDog said:

 

I still believe. 

 

Maybe if a few more people around here believed too it would happen, but no, you'd all rather Tinkerbell died and the world burns.

No mate the windows closed we managed to sign Lee Trundle and sold all of our class players. Eddie’s fucked off to England and PIF have bought the Mackems. The club is broken and everything is bad forever. No idea if any of this is true like, just a feeling. 

[Upthemags]

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

We can’t work out if we’re the only people interested in Guehi or he’s definitely going to Liverpool. People have gone bonkers. 

You think Palace wouldn't leak to the public if there were other interested bidders? Same way they've been leaking our interest, bid-by-bid, the past three weeks?

[timeEd32]

If Liverpool end this window with Guehi and Mamardashvili...

[AyeDubbleYoo]

1 minute ago, Upthemags said:

You think Palace wouldn't leak to the public if there were other interested bidders? Same way they've been leaking our interest, bid-by-bid, the past three weeks?

Well Liverpool have been ‘linked’, whatever that means. 

[Shearergol]

24 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

He's a backup at a club above us and so tthat means we will never catch-up, apparently.

 

I'm not even sure on him myself, and yet this kind of thinking pains me.

 

Right up there with how we will never progress signing players from clubs like Bournemouth, when we picked up Kelly.

 

I just think he's looked rubbish every time I've seen him play, especially for England (but I try not to judge players on playing under Southgate).

 

Even my father-in-law, who thinks that every single Liverpool player (particularly English ones) are the greatest players ever to play the game, doesn't rate him.

[Erikse]

17 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I mean the example he gave of Gordon going and them doing us a favour is a shocking one. Them signing one of our best players does us no favours at all. Us signing a player they don’t want for big money helps them.

 

Ofcourse, that's why I removed it right after posting. But it doesn't change the point. If he does well, that effectively means that Liverpool helped us aswell by selling him to us? Why can't it be both ways? Feel free to argue against my actual point if you think that it's not valid.

 

 

Edited August 20, 2024 by Erikse

[PauloGeordio]

13 minutes ago, BottledDog said:

 

I still believe. 

 

Maybe if a few more people around here believed too it would happen, but no, you'd all rather Tinkerbell died and the world burns.

[PauloGeordio]

5 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Well Liverpool have been ‘linked’, whatever that means. 

In a journalists click baiting imagination.

[Upthemags]

4 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Well Liverpool have been ‘linked’, whatever that means. 

Yes you're right. Its all very vague. Whatever we do, I hope we'll take a definitive stance one way or another in the coming days. Maddening watching us being toyed with by a mid-table side.

[Kanj]

If Liverpool pay less than we are offered, then there is something really rotten about how we were treated.  

 

Otherwise, i'm 100% supportive of buying abroad to spite and not fund the dealings of clubs with chairmen/owners who complained about us being taken over enough to slow it down, then created bullshit anti-competitive measures to limit our growth, and further continue to "tax" us for no apparent reason. All the while, we play nice because we have to.

 

Fuck them. I hope our players absolutely get into all of them on the pitch too - More Big Jow and BDB clattering. I'm sick of us walking on egg shells tbh. Fucking get into their faces. 

[andycap]

2 hours ago, TRon said:

 

I think he's a decent enough utility defender, but just out of interest, how would you feel if we bought him, then Liverpool used that money to buy Guehi?

 

 

It's not the end of the world lad. plus I'd be expecting gomes to be a lot cheaper. 

[Pixelphish]

I need a positive Ornstien tweet immediately.

[SUPERTOON]

2 minutes ago, andycap said:

It's not the end of the world lad. plus I'd be expecting gomes to be a lot cheaper. 

40 million they want apparently. 

[andycap]

Just now, SUPERTOON said:

40 million they want apparently. 

That's a better deal for us. 

Means we can go and get a right winger with the spare money we'd of had to pay for guehi. 

 

[mouldy_uk]

How did this thread get 200 pages!

[TBG]

1 hour ago, PauloGeordio said:

 

[SUPERTOON]

9 minutes ago, andycap said:

That's a better deal for us. 

Means we can go and get a right winger with the spare money we'd of had to pay for guehi. 

 

Strongly disagree. 

[Weezertron]

If we signed Gomez for 40m we'd be back look for a starting CB as soon as next summer, probably.

 

Last seasons injury mishandling is still killing us. 

[STM]

23 minutes ago, andycap said:

That's a better deal for us. 

Means we can go and get a right winger with the spare money we'd of had to pay for guehi. 

 

 

So you are happy for a downgrade in quality, yes?

 

You won't be one of the ones whinging when Gomez is sitting on the bench behind Schar in 6 months and saying it was a bad (un-needed) transfer?

 

I'm not saying you've done that in that past but other have with Barnes etc.

 

Personally I'd rather we signed quality, doesn't have to be Guehi but Gomez, along with Chalobah, is just another decent player who doesn't take us any further than we already are.

 

 

Edited August 20, 2024 by STM

[RobsonsWonderland]

3 minutes ago, STM said:

 

So you are happy for a downgrade in quality, yes?

 

You won't be one of the ones whinging when Gomez is sitting on the bench behind Schar in 6 months and saying it was a bad (un-needed) transfer?

 

I'm not saying you've done that in that past but other have with Barnes etc.

 

Personally I'd rather we signed quality, doesn't have to be Guehi but Gomez, along with Chalobah, is just another decent player who doesn't take us any further than we already are.

 

 

 

It could keep us the same level after injuries and suspensions or allow player rotation without massively impacting the team.

 

Rather then last season when a Dummett or a Ritchie had to play or take a place on the bench

[TRon]

1 hour ago, andycap said:

It's not the end of the world lad. plus I'd be expecting gomes to be a lot cheaper. 

 

They want £45m and he's 27 as opposed to £65m for a 24 yr old Guehi.

[andycap]

Gomez is a good solid centreback can play across the back four aswell. Injuries have have hampered him in his earlier years but I've always rated him. 

[andycap]

19 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

They want £45m and he's 27 as opposed to £65m for a 24 yr old Guehi.

You're acting like 65 million has been accepted by Palace. When they could want a lot more to part ways with. 

[andycap]

1 hour ago, STM said:

 

So you are happy for a downgrade in quality, yes?

 

You won't be one of the ones whinging when Gomez is sitting on the bench behind Schar in 6 months and saying it was a bad (un-needed) transfer?

 

I'm not saying you've done that in that past but other have with Barnes etc.

 

Personally I'd rather we signed quality, doesn't have to be Guehi but Gomez, along with Chalobah, is just another decent player who doesn't take us any further than we already are.

 

 

 

I never twist about players that get used as bench players. 

I just don't know why your so certain Guehi is miles better than gomez or chalobah? 

Until this year he was never mentioned by majority of us as a player we'd want at the back. 

To replace lascelles. 

[Coffee_Johnny]

2 hours ago, Kanji said:

Fuck them. I hope our players absolutely get into all of them on the pitch too - More Big Jow and BDB clattering. I'm sick of us walking on egg shells tbh. Fucking get into their faces. 

Spoiler

 

 

 

Edited August 20, 2024 by Coffee_Johnny