Pokerprince2004 Posted yesterday at 19:07 Share Posted yesterday at 19:07 Find it interesting who people pick as their managers. I grew up in the 90s so will always idolise Keegan and the entertainers team he created, we really should have won the league under him so he is still my number 1. Bobby and Eddie have had similar trajectories taking over us when we were bottom and getting us into the Champions League but Eddie done it a year earlier and has also reached a cup final and possibly another so I'd probably but Eddie at number 2 now. If he wins a cup he'll go to the top of the tree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted yesterday at 19:18 Share Posted yesterday at 19:18 I think Wilson would deserve at least a mention as one of the best strikers we’ve had since Shearer. Yes his injuries are beyond frustrating but he’s scored 50 goals for us in mostly shit sides. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnes23 Posted yesterday at 19:21 Share Posted yesterday at 19:21 2 hours ago, joeyt said: Are we saying Beye > Debuchy? He seems to be in a lot of second XIs whereas I remember Debuchy was really good when he first arrived Not for me - Debuchy better on a number of counts IMO (especially technically and going forward) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted yesterday at 20:15 Share Posted yesterday at 20:15 Pope Trippier Woodgate Botman Hall Solano Tonali Bruno Ginola Shearer Isak Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 20:21 Share Posted yesterday at 20:21 3 hours ago, joeyt said: Are we saying Beye > Debuchy? He seems to be in a lot of second XIs whereas I remember Debuchy was really good when he first arrived Beye was comfortably better than everyone pre-Trippier for me, but Debuchy would probably come second in that era. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinoasprilla Posted yesterday at 20:23 Share Posted yesterday at 20:23 Given, Trippier, Schar, Albert, Enrique, Cabeye, Bruno, Lee, Tino, Ferdinand, Isak subs or second eleven Pavel, Debuchy, Woodgate, Colocini, Bernard, Tiote, Tonali, Speed, Ben Arfa, Cole, Robert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 20:49 Share Posted yesterday at 20:49 25 minutes ago, tinoasprilla said: Given, Trippier, Schar, Albert, Enrique, Cabeye, Bruno, Lee, Tino, Ferdinand, Isak subs or second eleven Pavel, Debuchy, Woodgate, Colocini, Bernard, Tiote, Tonali, Speed, Ben Arfa, Cole, Robert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 20:50 Share Posted yesterday at 20:50 Hold on, it's happened a few times. What's going on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted yesterday at 20:54 Share Posted yesterday at 20:54 What’s the issue? Perfectly understandable to leave the Premier League’s top scorer and arguably NUFC’s greatest player in modern (ish) history out of an all time PREMIER LEAGUE XI Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 20:59 Share Posted yesterday at 20:59 3 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: What’s the issue? Perfectly understandable to leave the Premier League’s top scorer and arguably NUFC’s greatest player in modern (ish) history out of an all time PREMIER LEAGUE XI It's not either or though, just hoy them all in! Beardsley's our best player in the PL era. A genius. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted yesterday at 21:10 Share Posted yesterday at 21:10 5 hours ago, HawK said: Rob Lee - For me he was always a bit of a latter-day Kevin Nolan. Great goalscorer, but I wanted more from him. That’s a horrendous shout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted yesterday at 21:13 Share Posted yesterday at 21:13 9 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: It's not either or though, just hoy them all in! Beardsley's our best player in the PL era. A genius. Shearer being omitted from a prem XI is more ridiculous IMO. But I only saw Beardsley towards the end and not fully in his prime. His numbers are ridiculous, mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinoasprilla Posted yesterday at 21:21 Share Posted yesterday at 21:21 27 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: I know Beardsley played in the premier league but I grew up with him, waddle, keegan and the Gazza era, I was a kid aged 7 living in South Africa and my dad moved us back when keegan signed. I just don’t think it’s right picking Beardsley without the others from that era. As for shearer personal opinion records outstanding but we played better football and arguably more successful before he signed. I’m also not sure he had a positive impact on the team, dynamic rumours jealous of the fans adoration of ginola Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonas Posted yesterday at 21:38 Share Posted yesterday at 21:38 2 hours ago, Decky said: Can people who picked Pope over Given explain why? The question is more why is that such an outrageous concept? Given was dropped on occasions and Sir Bobby preferred Harper at times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted yesterday at 21:58 Share Posted yesterday at 21:58 31 minutes ago, tinoasprilla said: I know Beardsley played in the premier league but I grew up with him, waddle, keegan and the Gazza era, I was a kid aged 7 living in South Africa and my dad moved us back when keegan signed. I just don’t think it’s right picking Beardsley without the others from that era. As for shearer personal opinion records outstanding but we played better football and arguably more successful before he signed. I’m also not sure he had a positive impact on the team, dynamic rumours jealous of the fans adoration of ginola First I’ve ever heard of the Ginola rumour - and Ginola was completely off the boil when Shearer joined; the grumbles and complaints re his effort and output had already started when Shearer signed. Ginola would be a weird player for Sheree to be jealous of … Beardsley in his second spell is still the best player we had in the PL era. The idea of Ferdinand or Asprilla ahead of him is odd. Beardsley would be the first name on the team sheet of anyone who saw him. He’s the closest English football ever produced to Messi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted yesterday at 22:00 Share Posted yesterday at 22:00 20 minutes ago, Jonas said: The question is more why is that such an outrageous concept? Given was dropped on occasions and Sir Bobby preferred Harper at times. I’d probably pick Given over Pope but I don’t think Given was a great keeper by any stretch - picking Pope over him seems fairly rational; I think Pope pre-injury probably was a better keeper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted yesterday at 22:04 Share Posted yesterday at 22:04 47 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: Shearer being omitted from a prem XI is more ridiculous IMO. But I only saw Beardsley towards the end and not fully in his prime. His numbers are ridiculous, mind. Not sure about that - I’d be tempted by Isak and Beardsley as a front two. Shearer’s numbers in the PL era were heavily stacked by four seasons at Blackburn - we got one season of the Shearer we paid all that money for. His average in his first season with us was the same as his goal average for Blackburn - 0.81 per game. After his injury at Goodison, he never came close to that average again. It’s incredible that he continued to score goals at the highest level after he came back, but he had to completely change his style of play and the team had to be fundamentally rebuilt to cover his loss of pace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted yesterday at 22:09 Share Posted yesterday at 22:09 (edited) And yet he still managed to score a shit load more goals and also successfully change his style of play. Edited yesterday at 22:11 by Lush Vlad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 22:14 Share Posted yesterday at 22:14 58 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: Shearer being omitted from a prem XI is more ridiculous IMO. But I only saw Beardsley towards the end and not fully in his prime. His numbers are ridiculous, mind. Wouldn't omit Shearer either, but yeah Beardsley 93 to 96 is about as good as we've had it in my lifetime like, like Ben Arfa level wtf moments, but more regularly and with an extremely high work rate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted yesterday at 22:20 Share Posted yesterday at 22:20 Given Albert Woodgate Botman Solano Bruno Lee Ginola Beardsley Isak Shearer Probably the best I can come up with that still looks like a viable formation. Can only imagine how many goals Shearer and Isak could score with those five behind them. Nobby might have to do a bit of tracking back at times... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted yesterday at 22:21 Share Posted yesterday at 22:21 (edited) Born in 1990 so the entertainers era was all through the telly and the old black and white videos for me. So I will go from 03 when I first started going on me own to games Given Schar woodgate colo Solano Bruno Tonali Robert Ben Arfa Shearer Isak Howe manager Hall isn't far off but he's not done quite there yet for me. Ben Arfa was as talented as anyone I've ever seen play here and 3 at the back is the only way to get him in Edited yesterday at 22:23 by jack j Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted yesterday at 22:33 Share Posted yesterday at 22:33 I understand the argument but I can't leave out the only All-Time PL XI member from Newcastle's XI. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 48 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: And yet he still managed to score a shit load more goals and also successfully change his style of play. Agreed, but I think putting Isak and Beardsley ahead of him would be explicable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramirez Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 3 hours ago, Pokerprince2004 said: Find it interesting who people pick as their managers. I grew up in the 90s so will always idolise Keegan and the entertainers team he created, we really should have won the league under him so he is still my number 1. Bobby and Eddie have had similar trajectories taking over us when we were bottom and getting us into the Champions League but Eddie done it a year earlier and has also reached a cup final and possibly another so I'd probably but Eddie at number 2 now. If he wins a cup he'll go to the top of the tree Robson took over in early September though, Howe in November I think so we were much more in the mire, with a much worse squad. Agree about Keegan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago I’ll do one from when I first started seriously following the club (2011-12): Pope Trippier Schar Coloccini Santon Bruno Tiote Cabaye Ben Arfa Ba Isak Cheating a bit by swinging Isak out left…could also be convinced to put him central and Gordon left. Hall for Santon on current form, Tonali will overtake Tiote soon enough, and Botman should replace Colo if he gets back to where he was pre-injury. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now