Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TRon said:

 

 

I think we've already moved on tbh, if we do sign another striker my view is it will be Larsen. Even that should depend on Liverpool paying a premium for Isak otherwise we shouldn't be selling him either. He's one of the world's elite strikers and there's barely a handful. 

Agree with this. You don't sell your prize asset for under value in these circumstances. Either Liverpool cough up or he stays

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

If he’s got written proof they’ve said he can leave it’s a bit different to the situation with us and the rat.

Or if the person who made the verbal agreement is still in position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will never understand people who act like they're the same situations at all. He took some of the same actions, but I think it's very clear the circumstances are vastly different.

 

Ignoring the circumstances that led to his actions makes no sense to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mole said:

I will never understand people who act like they're the same situations at all. He took some of the same actions, but I think it's very clear the circumstances are vastly different.

 

Ignoring the circumstances that led to his actions makes no sense to me.

The situations aren’t the same the behaviour is 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, gdm said:

The situations aren’t the same the behaviour is 

Yes but the context that led to that behavior is different, ignoring what happened before he decided not to train is silly to me. I know Isak claimed similar. But the fact he came out and made his claims MONTHS after when it was supposed to happen tells me he's lying where I don't think Wissa is.

 

But I've said multiple times my views on this, doesn't really make sense to go round in circles on it.

 

 

Edited by Mole

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, madras said:

Or if the person who made the verbal agreement is still in position.

 

May be harsh but any agent advising a player a verbal agreement is worth anything needs to be sacked. Players shouldn't sign contracts they aren't prepared to honour and their agents shouldn't encourage them to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mole said:

I will never understand people who act like they're the same situations at all. He took some of the same actions, but I think it's very clear the circumstances are vastly different.

 

Ignoring the circumstances that led to his actions makes no sense to me.

They're the same in that the players are both reporting promises being made by clubs and we don't know what's true and what isn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

They're the same in that the players are both reporting promises being made by clubs and we don't know what's true and what isn't.

Aye we don’t know alll the facts and I hate the statement.  
 

But it seems as if Staveley made a verbal promise about a contract and she’s left. Isak has then said sometime later he wants to leave. 
 

It seems as if current Brentford ppl said Wissa could leave with a fair offer in some type of writing. 
 

If that is true. That’s a world of difference. 
 

and I’ve seen Wissa in training with the Brentford squad. Alex is refusing to train. 
 

If the above is true. It’s similar but not the same. 
 

Both should hand in transfer requests. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

They're the same in that the players are both reporting promises being made by clubs and we don't know what's true and what isn't.

True we don't and we likely never will, so I'm just reading between lines about how both saga's has panned out that leads me to believe one is lying and one isn't.

 

Obviously this would be easier if we had facts but unfortunately we don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mole said:

True we don't and we likely never will, so I'm just reading between lines about how both saga's has panned out that leads me to believe one is lying and one isn't.

 

Obviously this would be easier if we had facts but unfortunately we don't.

I don’t think Isak is lying. I think Staveley said he would get a contract and he let it be known he wanted to leave. But staveley has long left and he has a contract where nobody at the club agreed he would leave. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, HayDen Traces said:

Agree with this. You don't sell your prize asset for under value in these circumstances. Either Liverpool cough up or he stays

Genuine question - I’ve entered several threads this morning and regardless of topic they’re all discussing Isak, why can’t we keep it in the Isak thread? Not aimed at you in o Particular it’s just me putting it out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Tiresias said:

 

May be harsh but any agent advising a player a verbal agreement is worth anything needs to be sacked. Players shouldn't sign contracts they aren't prepared to honour and their agents shouldn't encourage them to.

The agent may not have even been aware of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

 

Oh so Isak's been training and is available for selection, must have missed that 🙄

Did I say identical ? No I did not 

 

Wissa didn’t train but has went back and Wissa has played the same amount of league and preseason minutes as Isak 

 

 

Edited by gdm

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, gdm said:

Did I say identical ? No I did not 

 

Wissa didn’t train but has went back and Wissa has played the same amount of league and preseason minutes as Isak 

 

 

 

 

Not played, but he was available for selection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...