Yorkie Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Fecking Americanism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Fecking Americanism. It's "fucking". Illiterate moron :roll: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 It's not. www.fatherjackvocab.com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 At the right price or on loan, I don't see why people wouldn't want him. Would maybe allow Milner to move into a central position where I think he'd be much better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NUFC4 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 SWP is still a class player (Man shity days), he just doesn't see the field at chelsea. i would have him at NUFC in a heartbeat if we had the chance. he's got fantastic pace and an attacking creativity that we so desperately need!! once he starts getting games under his belt the form will return Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 swp is still quality imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I'd give him a go on loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 He is a quality player that would add to nay squad, a loan deal would be perfect for us as he would not be cheap to buy. Come the end of the season if he does prove his worht it would then be money well spent if you could buy him, the down side with a loan deal is, if he plays really well Chelski would want him back, as we did with Milner and Villa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 SWP is Chelsea's answer to Luque, tbh bluebiggrin.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scribble Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 No end of story. He was a good player when he went to Chelsea but he seems well off form at the moment. He's not what we need, we have Milner in his position in great form, a player who's constantly worked hard for us (despite really shoddy treatment), who deserves to keep his place. It's spending cash which would by far be better spent on other positions where we are actually short of personnel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I'd have him on loan as he can play left or right wing. Milner could stay on the right and SWP could play on the left as N'Zogbia/Duff are both injured at the moment. If he's not in form drop him when N'Zogbia/Duff are fit. He'd be cover for Milner on the right. He could also be back up for Martins. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 lets hope that Roeder isn't thinking about him at the moment. Because I don't believe either he or Shepherd have the brains to be thinking about too much, and a RW is not what we need to be focusing on for now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 It will be fucking silly to stop letting Milner playing regularly. He's finally showing improvement after 3 years and now is the critical time for him to raise his class. Let Milner play as much as he can and we can have a top class winger for the next few seasons. Milner has the potential, he worths the investment, so no thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Hammers in SWP talks By Graeme Bailey - Created on 8 Jan 2007 Skysports.com understands Shaun Wright-Phillips has held talks with West Ham. A host of clubs are looking to land the England winger but The Hammers - fresh from their recent takeover - are flush with cash and are ready to match Chelsea's demands - which are in excess of £10million. Newcastle, Aston Villa, Manchester City and Portsmouth are all very keen - but they would all be loan deals initially and Chelsea are more inclined to take the cash. It is believed a deal between West Ham and Chelsea is very close, which is why Wright-Phillips has been given permission to talk terms. At this point it is not known how keen Wright-Phillips is on a move to East London - but the relegation-threatened Hammers will be hoping to convince the 25-year-old to make the switch. Since appointing Alan Curbishley as manager, West Ham have been quick to bolster their squad - having already snapped up Luis Boa Morte from Fulham. As well as Wright-Phillips, it is understood the club are also closing on West Brom's Nigel Quashie. Quashie is believed to be holding talks with The Hammers and could represent a double midfield capture with Russian star Alexei Smertin set to be confirmed as a West Ham player this week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Fk me the Hammers are going to be taking a massive suqad down to the Championship, Curbs is trying to buy everyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Fk me the Hammers are going to be taking a massive suqad down to the Championship, Curbs is trying to buy everyone. It would be deeply upsetting if Roeder were to have a similar policy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papo Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 it looks like he will be ours...! he doesnt want to go to WHU! i would welcome him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Would certainly like him on loan, just to re-iterate. And if it's between us and Villa, i'll be very optimistic. I pray that we don't sign him long-term, though. Here's the link, btw: http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=440237&CPID=8&clid=21&lid=3&title=Hammers+no+go+for+SWP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lee-Mus Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 No end of story. Milner is class and better than SWP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 I'm a bit divided on this one. This would be a bit of a trophy signing (even on loan) and certainly wouldn't be the answer to our problems. If we got him it could prove to be the inspired deal of the season, but probably wouldn't. I always felt SWP was a bit overrated even during his best season at Man City and I said so at the time. It's not a big surprise that he's failed at Chelsea, because he does lose the ball a lot and Mourinho doesn't tolerate this. There are some players who have a couple of big seasons and never recover that form. Look at James Beattie. SWP made a name for himself as a talented youngster quite late on in his career, at about 23 if I remember correctly he was suddenly on fire. That's not normal and after two excellent seasons his form has suddenly nosedived, probably due to a lack of games but possibly because he's not as good as everyone thought he was. He has the makings of another James Beattie, people forget Shaun is 25 now and it is important we do our research on this one and are strong enough to say no if we feel he's not worth it. SWP is an out-of-form big name who would be coming here to get games above all else. To give him games we'd have to drop an in-form youngster who has become popular with the fans recently and deserves his place in the team. That said he's a body and with our extremely limited squad (and probably money too) it's hard to pass up the opportunity of loaning a player of SWP's calibre. I wouldn't be disappointed with his signature, but I'd see it as a gamble. Perhaps with our problems lying in different areas we would do better to concentrate on other positions and keep the wingers we have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Can't be 25, he's so likkle! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now