Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

St James' Park

Delima

by Delima
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

et tu brute

et tu brute

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 14:00, SUPERTOON said:

Seems a bit pointless only extending by 8000 seats for what it will cost.

Expand  


It's the reason I'm still convinced it will be a new stadium, together with the fact that there will be lost revenue and a lot of season ticket holders affected, whilst work goes ahead

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dr Jinx

Dr Jinx

Posted
Posted

If SJP was to be rebuilt, would any of you accept having a ground share at SoL? They could do with the cash so am sure they’d lap it up.

 

Would just feel very very dirty

Link to post
Share on other sites
SteV

SteV

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 20:30, Dr Jinx said:

If SJP was to be rebuilt, would any of you accept having a ground share at SoL? They could do with the cash so am sure they’d lap it up.

 

Would just feel very very dirty

Expand  

No one, on either side, would think that a sensible idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SUPERTOON

SUPERTOON

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 20:30, Dr Jinx said:

If SJP was to be rebuilt, would any of you accept having a ground share at SoL? They could do with the cash so am sure they’d lap it up.

 

Would just feel very very dirty

Expand  

Not a chance it would happen, fans would trash their stadium.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SteV

SteV

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 21:56, TheBrownBottle said:

I think it’s a perfectly sensible idea.  But it wouldn’t fly in Mackemland

Expand  

It’s completely unworkable. Imagine the work that would have to get done covering and uncovering pro-safc signage every week, just to stop vandalism and defacement, which would probably happen every week regardless.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dr Jinx

Dr Jinx

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 22:05, SteV said:

It’s completely unworkable. Imagine the work that would have to get done covering and uncovering pro-safc signage every week, just to stop vandalism and defacement, which would probably happen every week regardless.

Expand  


They’d just remove it.. look what they did to their own bar before we played them ?

 

Probably pull all their seats out too and replace them with a neutral colour 

Link to post
Share on other sites
TheBrownBottle

TheBrownBottle

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 22:05, SteV said:

It’s completely unworkable. Imagine the work that would have to get done covering and uncovering pro-safc signage every week, just to stop vandalism and defacement, which would probably happen every week regardless.

Expand  

There’s cameras in there, and more cameras can be installed.  Ban people for acts of vandalism.  It being the SOS isn’t exactly a good excuse

Link to post
Share on other sites
Pandamninator

Pandamninator

Posted
Posted
  On 02/05/2024 at 22:05, SteV said:

It’s completely unworkable. Imagine the work that would have to get done covering and uncovering pro-safc signage every week, just to stop vandalism and defacement, which would probably happen every week regardless.

Expand  

Is that any different to San Siro, New York in the NFL and LA in the NBA where two franchises share the same stadium?

Link to post
Share on other sites
SteV

SteV

Posted
Posted
  On 03/05/2024 at 04:58, Pandamninator said:

Is that any different to San Siro, New York in the NFL and LA in the NBA where two franchises share the same stadium?

Expand  

Yes, massively. Those stadiums are genuinely shared, and belong to each team. The SoL would not belong to us and people would have absolutely zero respect for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SteV

SteV

Posted
Posted
  On 03/05/2024 at 00:09, TheBrownBottle said:

There’s cameras in there, and more cameras can be installed.  Ban people for acts of vandalism.  It being the SOS isn’t exactly a good excuse

Expand  

Of course I’m not saying it would in any way be acceptable, but it would still happen regardless.

 

Putting aside the vandalism issue. If the boot was on the other foot, would you want to help them out? I certainly wouldn’t. Imagine having to see your biggest rivals celebrate some potentially famous wins in your ground. Fuck that ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
r0cafella

r0cafella

Posted
Posted
  On 03/05/2024 at 05:57, SteV said:

Of course I’m not saying it would in any way be acceptable, but it would still happen regardless.

 

Putting aside the vandalism issue. If the boot was on the other foot, would you want to help them out? I certainly wouldn’t. Imagine having to see your biggest rivals celebrate some potentially famous wins in your ground. Fuck that ?

Expand  

You can’t equate the two, they need money and as the owner has shown they are more than happy to role out the red carpet for us. 
 

Don’t think it will happen either mind, the plans we have for SJP are still shrouded in mystery as we know absolutely nothing at this stage. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
SteV

SteV

Posted
Posted
  On 03/05/2024 at 06:00, r0cafella said:

You can’t equate the two, they need money and as the owner has shown they are more than happy to role out the red carpet for us. 
 

Don’t think it will happen either mind, the plans we have for SJP are still shrouded in mystery as we know absolutely nothing at this stage. 

Expand  

They’ll have learnt their lesson from the cup debacle. 
 

They wouldn’t entertain allowing us to use their ground now. And rightly so.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted

If we offered them decent money to use their stadium as a big toilet they'd happily take it and provide the paper. 

 

Both sets of fans though wouldn't be happy. Some of ours may take joy in 'taking over' and filling their ground for a change, but I'd rather we looked at buying Gateshead stadium, revamping it as a football ground only, and have our u21 and lasses play there alongside Gateshead giving them a home and a chance to playing in the higher leagues. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted
  On 03/05/2024 at 08:07, Miggys First Goal said:

The fewm on RTG if it happened would be immense. 

Expand  

 

You know every time we played there they'd have to have police sectioning them away from the ground as they beeeeew the fans coming to the stadium. 

 

Rather go beeeeew the mags than support our lot, but we're also the best fans in the werld.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Whitley mag

Whitley mag

Posted
Posted

I wouldn’t want to be boosting their economy every fortnight no thanks. Besides it’s a bleak fucking shit hole and would be depressing as fuck after the novelty of taking over the place had worn off. The local boozers would bump their prices and take our eye balls out and you’d inevitably have to give a gobby little mackem scrote a good hiding at some point risking a jail term.

 

Just send the bulldozers into Castle Leazes now and start fucking digging.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fezzle

Fezzle

Posted
Posted
  On 03/05/2024 at 09:29, Whitley mag said:

I wouldn’t want to be boosting their economy every fortnight no thanks. Besides it’s a bleak fucking shit hole and would be depressing as fuck after the novelty of taking over the place had worn off. The local boozers would bump their prices and take our eye balls out and you’d inevitably have to give a gobby little mackem scrote a good hiding at some point risking a jail term.

 

Just send the bulldozers into Castle Leazes now and start fucking digging.

Expand  

In the tiny chance of this happened there is less than zero chance that it wouldnt be buses/special metros in and out. Like fuck the police would just let us drink there man, you would need to literally ban all mackems from the city centre for the day

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...