Jump to content

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Infinitely Content said:

I like that about it, it feels elevated and sanctified, up-on-high, where one must climb to reach it. Much prefer that feeling than some walk in from street level shopping-centre-esque shite.

We need street level interaction in our new stadium. Be it for bars/restaurants, club museum, fanzone, club shop/box office etc. Anything else and it’s a barrier for non match-day income, and it begins to feel like something only football fans can visit.

 

 

Edited by Stifler

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LFEE said:

 

If you can be competitive on flight prices you’ll be surprised the effort people will make to fly from that airport.

 

That's where they let themselves down imo. Flights from Edinburgh tend to be far cheaper, and parking there is much more reasonable than Newcastle. As I result we use Edinburgh Airport as much as we do Newcastle, if not more, even for destinations that we can reach from Newcastle.

 

Helps that Edinburgh are far better served by Ryanair and Easyjet as well mind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Infinitely Content said:


I like that about it, it feels elevated and sanctified, up-on-high, where one must climb to reach it. Much prefer that feeling than some walk in from street level shopping-centre-esque shite.

Shopping centre like shite is where the money’s at. The bottom line will dictate the design.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

That's where they let themselves down imo. Flights from Edinburgh tend to be far cheaper, and parking there is much more reasonable than Newcastle. As I result we use Edinburgh Airport as much as we do Newcastle, if not more, even for destinations that we can reach from Newcastle.

 

Helps that Edinburgh are far better served by Ryanair and Easyjet as well mind!

Yep. Simple economics can drive tourism etc. Thankfully EasyJet are returning back to Newcastle so that should hopefully help a little.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, aussiemag said:


I meant on Leazes park. So we don’t lose the charm of the current stadium. 


Be like dumping your lass and getting together with her younger sister 

 

They dress the same, sound the same and look very similar but the younger sister lives next door to your lass and has bigger boobs 

 

Doesn’t appeal to me, but each to their own 

 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said:


Be like dumping your lass and getting together with her younger sister 

 

They dress the same, sound the same and look very similar but the younger sister lives next door to your lass and has bigger boobs 

 

Doesn’t appeal to me, but each to their own 

 

 

 

 

 

Younger with bigger boobs sounds alright to me, like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said:

Be like dumping your lass and getting together with her younger sister.

 

They dress the same, sound the same and look very similar but the younger sister lives next door to your lass and has bigger boobs.

 

Doesn’t appeal to me, but each to their own.

My ex is an identical twin. Her sister is a nice enough lass, but is a massive hypochondriac.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, et tu brute said:

Any new stadium will be named after whoever sponsors it. That's just common sense to entice a high level sponsor and get higher revenue 

Possibly yes and no. It could contain two components like when Boro had the Cellnet riverside stadium which just reverted to the Riverside when the naming rights ended. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, aussiemag said:

What if they rebuilt St. James Park to the same design as it is currently, but with Level 7 all the way around the gallowgate and east stand and upgrade the corporate facilities around both sides of the pitch. 

 

The final decision will not be based on location or capacity, but on maximising revenues through corporate income, though of course they will be considerations.

We're just so far behind the clubs with new and bigger stadiums right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, madras said:

Possibly yes and no. It could contain two components like when Boro had the Cellnet riverside stadium which just reverted to the Riverside when the naming rights ended. 

 

Smellnet riverside wasn't it?

 

 

Edited by El Prontonise

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cubaricho said:

Just absolute peak post here. :lol: 

Just saying, pissed me off that we had to drop everything to go and wait in A&E with her after I had just done a 12 hour shift, couldn’t be fucked with the obligation to have to do it all the time if I was stuffing her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Newcastle is in the middle of nowhere in UK geographical terms - it isn’t a ‘hub’ or a potential centre of the economy of the north.  As much as I love the place, anyone thinking this is indulging in wishful thinking. 

 

Probably true, but the 1 million plus population of the metropolitan area does give it the feel of a regional metropolis.

Though maybe on a smaller scale it lacks nothing in terms of facilities, transport, lifestyle or cultural identity and diversity, that other bigger cities have. In fact it probably surpasses some of them. Added to that it's proximity to an amazing coastline and the wilderness hills makes it a very attractive place to live.

At very least it's the hub of everything between Leeds and Edinburgh [emoji38] 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Benwell Lad said:

 

Probably true, but the 1 million plus population of the metropolitan area does give it the feel of a regional metropolis.

Though maybe on a smaller scale it lacks nothing in terms of facilities, transport, lifestyle or cultural identity and diversity, that other bigger cities have. In fact it probably surpasses some of them. Added to that it's proximity to an amazing coastline and the wilderness hills makes it a very attractive place to live.

At very least it's the hub of everything between Leeds and Edinburgh [emoji38] 

No arguments from me that there are worse places to live :)  - and it has a fair amount going for it - but there just aren’t enough people (and enough wealth) in that catchment area to make it an economic hub.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, madras said:

Possibly yes and no. It could contain two components like when Boro had the Cellnet riverside stadium which just reverted to the Riverside when the naming rights ended. 


Can't see that happening with any new stadium we have sponsored. You very probably would have for St James', I just think if any sponsorship for a new stadium ended, then a new one would replace it almost immediately 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will end up with a spine ship, but I hope for a long term one. I’d hate for it to be like those clubs who keep changing their stadium name. Give me 20 years of calling it 1 name over like the Reebok which has been named 16 different names since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NWMag said:

Would holding that new arena on the Quayside by something PIF would be interested in?

 

I know it’s not the premise of the garbage Chronicle website link but I have wondered if they’d jump in after it stalled. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...