Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ShootShoot said:

Hes not a real historian is he though ? Hes a historian in the same way that im a chef whos just cooked chicken chips for me tea . 

He ripped that vid off another kid on youtube anyhow 

Your right, couldn't agree more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ShootShoot said:

Hes not a real historian is he though ? Hes a historian in the same way that im a chef whos just cooked chicken chips for me tea . 

He ripped that vid off another kid on youtube anyhow 

You do a belter chicken chips mind 

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

I mean that's bollocks tbf :lol:. For a start, the original post was about Brown Bottle's post about having less ambition - that you liked and agreed with, but the bit in bold is what I said you'd said. "Less ambition", I didn't say or insinuate you meant no ambition.

 

Your post was snarky as fuck man. [emoji38] ..."apparently extending the ground means they have less ambition, har har har" ...well yeah, on the face of it that does sound ridiculous, but if you consider it in a wider context then going from considering building an entirely new stadium to a modest extension, then that can be seen as being less ambitious. Again though, the sarcasm in your post insinuated that I was just being a whingebag who was disenchanted with the ownership, which is actually far from the case. If all they do is extend the Gallowgate then they are still as good as any owners the club has ever had. But it would still be quite far from having elite ambitions IMO. And that is because over the last 30 months the goalposts have been moved, meaning the massive gap between NUFC and the cartel cant merely be bridged by a modest extension to the Gallowgate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wandy said:

 

Your post was snarky as fuck man. [emoji38] ..."apparently extending the ground means they have less ambition, har har har" ...well yeah, on the face of it that does sound ridiculous, but if you consider it in a wider context then going from considering building an entirely new stadium to a modest extension, then that can be seen as being less ambitious. Again though, the sarcasm in your post insinuated that I was just being a whingebag who was disenchanted with the ownership, which is actually far from the case. If all they do is extend the Gallowgate then they are still as good as any owners the club has ever had. But it would still be quite far from having elite ambitions IMO. And that is because over the last 30 months the goalposts have been moved, meaning the massive gap between NUFC and the cartel cant merely be bridged by a modest extension to the Gallowgate.

 

I know it was snarky, that was the intention. I do think the idea what you and others are describing is ridiculous, it's what inspired me to write a snarky post about it. :lol: Not sure what else to say really.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

I know it was snarky, that was the intention. I do think the idea what you and others are describing is ridiculous, it's what inspired me to write a snarky post about it. :lol: Not sure what else to say really.

 

Right. So you are unable to debate a point without resorting to jibes and sarcasm. Thanks for clearing that up. [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Toon1892 said:

As I expected really. A new stadium was never really an option. 
 

A new stadium is only exempt from FFP if you can show the following:

 

”Clubs need to ensure that building a new stadium is financially sustainable and feasible. This involves conducting thorough financial analyses to determine the costs, potential revenue streams, and long-term viability of the project.”

 

Unfortunately going from a 52,000 seater to a 65,000 seater costing £1bn isn’t viable. The marginal payback will be over 100 years.

 

Really don’t know what most on here we’re expecting?


Expanding the Gallowgate was obvious when they purchased the land behind it and decided to put a temporary fan zone behind it.

 

The owners intention hasn’t changed this has been the plan since they came in.

 

Really not sure why everyone is surprised.

 

Maybe they expect to run into trouble with an extension, therefore adds to the need of moving. If we can show we can't expand appropriately, then we use the 'we tried' card and get round any FFP concern.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

Family Enclosure capacity is 5,007 (Milburn L7A/LL7A through to L7H/LL7H).

 

That seems a lot. Harsh, but even reduce that to 2k and 3k extra game-to-game or season tickets would be canny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

Family Enclosure capacity is 5,007 (Milburn L7A/LL7A through to L7H/LL7H).

Wonder how many kids are in the family enclosure ? Mines 20 and the other ones in our group are 18, 20 and 24.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Keegans Export said:

What are the other three? Presumably do nothing is one, a new stadium another?


I haven’t seen it, only heard tidbits.

 

Knocking SJP down and rebuilding on site I’d say is nailed down as an option.. plus points being they already own the land so less expense but probably more in terms of the scale of it.

 

New site/new stadium.

 

Existing site, existing stadium - increase capacity.

 

Existing site, existing stadium.. gut it and spatially redesign what’s there. Think Ikea

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dr Jinx said:


I haven’t seen it, only heard tidbits.

 

Knocking SJP down and rebuilding on site I’d say is nailed down as an option.. plus points being they already own the land so less expense but probably more in terms of the scale of it.

 

New site/new stadium.

 

Existing site, existing stadium - increase capacity.

 

Existing site, existing stadium.. gut it and spatially redesign what’s there. Think Ikea

 

 

So Option 4 doesn’t increase capacity? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2 preferred options are build a new super stadium at Castle Leazes and transform current site into a well maintained park for the whole city to use.

 

The 2nd and I think likely option is they’ll purchase land for a huge training complex, which will incorporate a new 30k stadium for woman’s team, 20k would probably be ideal, but they’ll go 30k as this will be used whilst they flatten SJP and rebuild completely on the current site.

 

With the Euro’s being at SJP I think the 2nd option lets us concentrate on training complex in the interim period.

 

Just extending the Gallowgate isn’t a signal of lack of ambition in my opinion, but it is flawed in the long term unless it involves a massive upgrading of all 3 other stands as well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

That seems a lot. Harsh, but even reduce that to 2k and 3k extra game-to-game or season tickets would be canny.

 

It actually used to be bigger. Ashley had it extended right the way around into the corner but I've been put in the corner twice this season when applying for Category 2 tickets so assume they have scaled the Family Enclosure back now.

 

As @madrassays it hasn't really been strictly enforced as a family enclosure for a while. A lot of people in there seem to be in the 18-25 age range now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whitley mag said:

My 2 preferred options are build a new super stadium at Castle Leazes and transform current site into a well maintained park for the whole city to use.

 

The 2nd and I think likely option is they’ll purchase land for a huge training complex, which will incorporate a new 30k stadium for woman’s team, 20k would probably be ideal, but they’ll go 30k as this will be used whilst they flatten SJP and rebuild completely on the current site.

 

With the Euro’s being at SJP I think the 2nd option lets us concentrate on training complex in the interim period.

 

Just extending the Gallowgate isn’t a signal of lack of ambition in my opinion, but it is flawed in the long term unless it involves a massive upgrading of all 3 other stands as well. 

That 2nd option would be the perfect soloution imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, r0cafella said:

So Option 4 doesn’t increase capacity? 


potentially up to 5-8k extra seats through better use of the space. It’s still a huge fit out job and costly so hopefully not something they opt for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said:


potentially up to 5-8k extra seats through better use of the space. It’s still a huge fit out job and costly so hopefully not something they opt for.

Interesting, I wonder if they will lump for that plus an extension, would gain a lot of goodwill with the fans I imagine. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://theathletic.com/5377168/2024/04/01/tottenham-hotspur-stadium-beyonce-nfl-profit/?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=twitterfc&source=twitteruk

 

An interesting long-read on the Spurs stadium, which has had its ups and downs with fans (downs mainly being about ticket prices, understandable).

 

The club are making money hand over fist on other events and are planning other developments on the site (hotel, residential towers).

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Kid Icarus said:

The point made about stadium rebuild/expansion meaning it'll be more affordable for people with less money has hardly any credibility like.

 

Spurs' stadium is often pointed to as what we could have if we do it right.

 

If this is doing it right I'd rather do it the 'wrong' way.

 

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeaVqbKd/

Aye but Levy is a fucking greedy cunt who was always going to do that.

You can still build a new stadium and fuck over pensioners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cookie1892 said:

ive been told by someone that we are exploring a new training facility up near the airport.

 

Which to be fair makes a lot of sense as they all pretty much live in Darras Hall anyway

Time to make Sir John Hall an even richer man

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever happens, it's vital the seating arrangements incorporate more signing/standing sections. If the gallowgate end was extended to match the rest of the ground, it would be a thing of beauty. Some great pictures here someone has posted over the years: https://www.facebook.com/GallowgateExpansion/photos I would miss the sloped roof, but there's no doubting how imposing and intimidating this would be. You could get an additional seats in the L4 milburn/gallowgate corner and along with the new L7 seats you could get an extra 8k seats, possibly 9k who knows. This would take the capacity to potentially 61k. Is there a reason why we don't host more gigs etc for additional revenue? Perhaps there would be more scope with additional inside facilities added to a new gallowgate end? Capacity wise, I think 61k is enough and it's important to keep some element of demand as someone said earlier.  

 

275193023_5422872697725859_7038478028141132801_n.jpg

343014980_245901791298574_7482766077132128196_n.jpg

 

 

Edited by timnufc22

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...