Joey Barton completes move for £5.8m - Man City

[Guest Nappy Rash]

you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k

 

I think i'm on safe ground here tbh

 

Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question?

 

His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment.

 

But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks 

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k

 

I think i'm on safe ground here tbh

 

Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question?

 

His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment.

 

But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks 

 

 

I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k

 

and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank

[Guest Nappy Rash]

I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k

 

Why because I used basic logic to say he had been paid £300k? I suppose if you closed your eyes, ran around in circles for 30 mins and downed a litre ov Vodka you could come to that conclusion like.

 

and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank

 

No he did not ask for a transfer, he exercised his right to talk to a club meeting the release clause (this is the important part) Manchester City insterted into his contract.

 

All very, very simple 

[mrmojorisin75]

you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k

 

I think i'm on safe ground here tbh

 

Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question?

 

His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment.

 

But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks 

 

 

I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k

 

and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank

 

get a grip man, he's at a club where he's been suspended and told he should leave

 

a release clause is met and what?  he's gonna say nah this is a right laugh here i think i'll stay and not play football again for the remainder of my contract....

 

jesus

 

 

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k

 

Why because I used basic logic to say he had been paid £300k? I suppose if you closed your eyes, ran around in circles for 30 mins and downed a litre ov Vodka you could come to that conclusion like.

 

and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank

 

No he did not ask for a transfer, he exercised his right to talk to a club meeting the release clause (this is the important part) Manchester City insterted into his contract.

 

All very, very simple 

 

ah right so his loyalty extends only so far? I wonder why they had to have a release clause in the first place, if in fact it was City that asked for it and not willie mckay

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k

 

I think i'm on safe ground here tbh

 

Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question?

 

His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment.

 

But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks 

 

 

I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k

 

and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank

 

get a grip man, he's at a club where he's been suspended and told he should leave

 

a release clause is met and what?  he's gonna say nah this is a right laugh here i think i'll stay and not play football again for the remainder of my contract....

 

jesus

 

 

who asked him to leave?

 

and after all that you think the word loyalty has any place in this situation? daft

 

if anything Barton owes City in damages

[Guest Nappy Rash]

ah right so his loyalty extends only so far? I wonder why they had to have a release clause in the first place, if in fact it was City that asked for it and not willie mckay

 

Totally and utterly irrelevant.

 

At least it looks like its sank in though 

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

ah right so his loyalty extends only so far? I wonder why they had to have a release clause in the first place, if in fact it was City that asked for it and not willie mckay

 

Totally and utterly irrelevant.

 

At least it looks like its sank in though 

 

rubbish

 

if he's claiming loyalty it wouldnt matter who offered what, City could never have forced him out the door

[Guest Nappy Rash]

 

rubbish

 

Be positive, I'd say you were consistent  :parky:

 

if he's claiming loyalty it wouldnt matter who offered what, City could never have forced him out the door

 

Again totally and utterly irrelevant, he's claiming loyalty because he never asked for a move, a clause was met in his contract which enabled him to leave, simple really.

 

Man City suspended him and made it clear he wouldnt be playing anytime soon you knacker 

[ChezGiven]

No strawmen in that post? Shame, i was just getting used to being in 1999 again.

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

 

rubbish

 

Be positive, I'd say you were consistent  :parky:

 

if he's claiming loyalty it wouldnt matter who offered what, City could never have forced him out the door

 

Again totally and utterly irrelevant, he's claiming loyalty because he never asked for a move, a clause was met in his contract which enabled him to leave, simple really.

 

Man City suspended him and made it clear he wouldnt be playing anytime soon you knacker 

 

I think you need a dictionary tbh

 

loyalty doesn't have a set limit, either you're loyal or you're not

 

Barton was under no obligation to speak to any club, but he JUMPED at the chance to

 

 

[Guest Nappy Rash]

 

I think you need a dictionary tbh

 

The problem is you're lacking a vital organ required to think, but top marks for trying.

 

loyalty doesn't have a set limit, either you're loyal or you're not

 

Nonsense, you either ask for a move and say goodbye to your loyalty payment or you move by other means and you are legally entitled to it, very, very simple.

 

Barton was under no obligation to speak to any club, but he JUMPED at the chance to

 

So what, totally and utterly irrelevant in the pathetic point you are arguing.

[Syrette]

Nappy Rash in non-deluded posts shocker.

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

 

I think you need a dictionary tbh

 

The problem is you're lacking a vital organ required to think, but top marks for trying.

 

loyalty doesn't have a set limit, either you're loyal or you're not

 

Nonsense, you either ask for a move and say goodbye to your loyalty payment or you move by other means and you are legally entitled to it, very, very simple.

 

Barton was under no obligation to speak to any club, but he JUMPED at the chance to

 

So what, totally and utterly irrelevant in the pathetic point you are arguing.

 

you are so far removed from logical thought it's not even funny any more

 

good luck in the asylum

[Guest Nappy Rash]

Nappy Rash in non-deluded posts shocker.

 

Nothing has changed other than you must be in agreement with me this time.

 

Therein lies the answer 

[Guest newcastle4life]

Glad to see the deal finally completed hopefully more signings follow.

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

there are people on parade today who have more loyalty in their little fingers than the scumbag barton will ever have in his entire miserable lonely existence

[midds]

Isn't Barton up before The Beak tomorrow morning?

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

he'll be like Scott Harrion, can't make it back to England for an assault trial because a Spanish judge has confiscated his passport while he awaits trial for the alleged assault on the fat eddie murphy over access to the rowing machine at half 5 in the morning

[Guest Toon83]

Listen, all of you still going on about the loyalty bonus, who really gives a shit, he is our player now, no matter if you think he is greedy or what not, judge him for his performances in the black and white next season, i mean come on all players are in it for the money and go to the highest bidder so whats £300k to a football team when they are paying a player £70k a week and a £5.8m transfer fee

 

Let it go and move on

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

Listen, all of you still going on about the loyalty bonus, who really gives a shit, he is our player now, no matter if you think he is greedy or what not, judge him for his performances in the black and white next season, i mean come on all players are in it for the money and go to the highest bidder so whats £300k to a football team when they are paying a player £70k a week and a £5.8m transfer fee

 

Let it go and move on

 

it's idiots with that kind of view which allow things like allow the Dyer/Bowyer incident to happen on the pitch

 

do you think that is all forgotten or do you think NUFC is still a laughing stock to the nation?

 

it's just another in a long line of short sighted idiotic decisions

[Guest Toon83]

Listen, all of you still going on about the loyalty bonus, who really gives a shit, he is our player now, no matter if you think he is greedy or what not, judge him for his performances in the black and white next season, i mean come on all players are in it for the money and go to the highest bidder so whats £300k to a football team when they are paying a player £70k a week and a £5.8m transfer fee

 

Let it go and move on

 

it's idiots with that kind of view which allow things like allow the Dyer/Bowyer incident to happen on the pitch

 

do you think that is all forgotten or do you think NUFC is still a laughing stock to the nation?

 

it's just another in a long line of short sighted idiotic decisions

 

You saying i'm the idiot here btw?

[Guest Invicta_Toon]

Listen, all of you still going on about the loyalty bonus, who really gives a shit, he is our player now, no matter if you think he is greedy or what not, judge him for his performances in the black and white next season, i mean come on all players are in it for the money and go to the highest bidder so whats £300k to a football team when they are paying a player £70k a week and a £5.8m transfer fee

 

Let it go and move on

 

it's idiots with that kind of view which allow things like allow the Dyer/Bowyer incident to happen on the pitch

 

do you think that is all forgotten or do you think NUFC is still a laughing stock to the nation?

 

it's just another in a long line of short sighted idiotic decisions

 

You saying i'm the idiot here btw?

 

did you brush off the bowyer signing too?

[Dokko]

We will be a bigger laughing stock when Owen leaves us for £9m, or when Luque is finally free transfered, i hear no one laughing at us sort out as small matter of £300k payment.

 

We ended the bad blood if anything.

[Guest Toon83]

whats this debate about a loyalty bonus got to do with Lee Bowyer and a fight on the pitch?