Optimistic Nut Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Just seen the goals, poor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest koenji Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 first half decent opposition he plays against and lets in 3 goals.....get rid eh! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooneyToonArmy Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 awww. poor Shay eh -- Celtic’s decision to extend the loan of Newcastle United goalkeeper Fraser Forster is likely to ruin Shay Given’s chances of joining the Scottish giants. Given wants out at Manchester City and was hoping to complete a dream move to Parkhead in January but news has emerged that the Hoops will keep Forster, who has impressed in his 13 league appearances. Given cannot dislodge City number one Joe Hart and is far too good a goalkeeper to be sitting on the bench hence his want for a shift away from Eastlands but this latest occurrence looks to deny him a chance to return to the club where he developed during his youth days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Well hopefully he joins them at the end of the season and Forster comes back... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Given denied by our 3rd choice keeper, brilliant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 LOL poor poor Given Not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Not really a good news. Sounds like Celtic has a chance to make the loan deal permanent. Or else they shouldn't turn down the chance to sign Given. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Majority of Celtic fans across their many forums really would like to keep him as far as I can tell. The ones that don't are calling for Given/Keiren Westwood to be brought in. All of them agree he can only get better. His supporters argue there's more pressing needs and that he's not been helped by an unsettled back four this year. His detractors are jerks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Not really a good news. Sounds like Celtic has a chance to make the loan deal permanent. Or else they shouldn't turn down the chance to sign Given. What an absurd inference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Not really a good news. Sounds like Celtic has a chance to make the loan deal permanent. Or else they shouldn't turn down the chance to sign Given. He'll still be available in the Summer. Why bring in a second keeper when they already had Forster til the end of the season? Don't think we'll let him go permanently anyways. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Don't think there's any chance of us letting a keeper of his age and potential go, especially with that part of the statement where we said we were focused on bringing local and foreign youngsters through and into the first team. It is a perfect opportunity to justify the claim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Given denied by our 3rd choice keeper, brilliant He'll be 1st choice soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 If he sorts his kicking out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Not really a good news. Sounds like Celtic has a chance to make the loan deal permanent. Or else they shouldn't turn down the chance to sign Given. What an absurd inference. Seriously. He's clearly cheaper than Given, so they can save some money. It's a good sign as they obviously feel their not losing much quality by sticking with Forster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Him or Krul will be gone within the next 3 transfer windows it's inevitable. Whichever one is second choice will be looking to move on, that would happen at pretty much any club with the potential both have. With Krul in hold of the shirt he's most likely to stay imo. As long as we get a good fee with future clauses it won't be too bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Not really a good news. Sounds like Celtic has a chance to make the loan deal permanent. Or else they shouldn't turn down the chance to sign Given. What an absurd inference. Seriously. He's clearly cheaper than Given, so they can save some money. It's a good sign as they obviously feel their not losing much quality by sticking with Forster. We have to agree to sell him first, which we will not. You seem to think Celtic deserve to sign the guy. He's our player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Him or Krul will be gone within the next 3 transfer windows it's inevitable. Whichever one is second choice will be looking to move on, that would happen at pretty much any club with the potential both have. With Krul in hold of the shirt he's most likely to stay imo. As long as we get a good fee with future clauses it won't be too bad. This. I feel we were majorly spoilt by having Harper and Given for so many years. I'd be surprised if we can pull that off again, which is a shame. Can see one of them going after about a year of those 2 fighting for number 1. Assuming that will be next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 No disrespect to Harper, but whoever's second choice here will be 10x the keeper he was at 27-28 when they're that age. Think it'll be Krul and Harper second-choice until he's about 39 before he retires, then we'll get random back-up keepers in the Carlo Nash, Stuart Taylor mould. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Harper was a very good keeper at 27. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 At 27 he was on his way to a handful of league starts in 5 years, not a chance will Forster & Krul be settling for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Whats the general consensus regards Krul and Forster, who do people feel is better? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Whats the general consensus regards Krul and Forster, who do people feel is better? Whatever Ronaldo says tbh, its just easier that way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 How's he getting on today? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now