Jump to content

Where does our strikeforce rate?


Recommended Posts

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Solskear, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

I wouldn't be in any rush to swap our strikeforce. In what order do you think they rate, compared to the others in the premiership?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DavB93

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Anderson, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

I wouldn't be in any rush to swap our strikeforce. In what order do you think they rate, compared to the others in the premiership?

 

 

 

I'd say in order:

 

Man Utd

Arsenal (Just got a feeling this year)

Newcastle

Liverpool

Chelsea

Spurs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest optimistic nit

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

 

 

 

 

Removed anderson because he isn't a striker.

 

We are 3rd imo behind spurs and liverpool, but by far the most injury prone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Anderson, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

I wouldn't be in any rush to swap our strikeforce. In what order do you think they rate, compared to the others in the premiership?

 

 

 

I'd say in order:

 

Man Utd

Arsenal (Just got a feeling this year)

Newcastle

Liverpool

Chelsea

Spurs

 

I think 2nd on paper, but i'm sure our front line will get more goals than Man u's strikers say maybe 1st!

 

Can't really think of anybody else that's got 3 Top strikers like that, just hope they can stay fit and perform

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think there is really a simple answer to that one.

 

I suppose you could go off how many league goals each player would score and total them up, so here would be mine off the top of my head.

 

Us- Owen (18), Viduka (15), Martins (10),  Ameobi (6) (Total:49)

 

Liverpool- Torres (18), Crouch (16), Kuyt (11), Vorinin (-8-) (Total:53)

 

Man Utd- Rooney (15), Saha (12), Anderson (6), Tevez (14) (Total:47)

 

Arsenal- Adebayor (11), Van Persie (13), De Silva (15), Bentner (6) (Total:45)

 

Chelsea- Drogba (23), Pizzaro (10), Shevchenko (16), Kalou (5) (Total:54)

 

Spurs- Berbatov (18), Keane (12), Defoe (10), Bent (15) (Total:55)

 

I've removed Smith so everyone has 4 strikers each and i also think he'll be a mid anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest LucaAltieri

3rd behind Liverpool and Chelsea.

 

I expect Sheva to come alive this season (if he sticks around).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know he's got dodgy knees and is 34, but surely Solskjaer should be on Man Utd's list.

 

That said, we've certainly got a great deal of Premiership-proven quality up front...with decent service, we should have no trouble finishing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Man U

Chelsea (almost entirely because of Drogba)

Newcastle

Spurs

Liverpool

Arsenal

 

Its only on paper like, Arsenal and Liverpool have a better everything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Anderson, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

I wouldn't be in any rush to swap our strikeforce. In what order do you think they rate, compared to the others in the premiership?

 

 

 

I'd say in order:

 

Man Utd

Arsenal (Just got a feeling this year)

Newcastle

Liverpool

Chelsea

Spurs

 

:idiot2:

 

Spurs definitely don't have the worst batch of 4 strikers from that list.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DavB93

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Anderson, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

I wouldn't be in any rush to swap our strikeforce. In what order do you think they rate, compared to the others in the premiership?

 

 

 

I'd say in order:

 

Man Utd

Arsenal (Just got a feeling this year)

Newcastle

Liverpool

Chelsea

Spurs

 

:idiot2:

 

Spurs definitely don't have the worst batch of 4 strikers from that list.

 

 

 

I think they do, they've got a good bunch of strikers but think they got the weakest from the list. This is mainly because I think Torres will be awesome this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blackburn have quite a good strike force also and i don't know wheather anyone agrees or have just fogotten about them or don't realise they have good strengh and depth.

 

McCarthy ( No need to comment )

Santa Cruz ( Looks to be a good striker )

Derbyshire ( Good for present and future )

Rigters ( Young,energetic and one for the future,looked good at u21's )

Roberts ( Decent cover,strong,holds the ball up well and brings others into play )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest optimistic nit

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Anderson, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

I wouldn't be in any rush to swap our strikeforce. In what order do you think they rate, compared to the others in the premiership?

 

 

 

I'd say in order:

 

Man Utd

Arsenal (Just got a feeling this year)

Newcastle

Liverpool

Chelsea

Spurs

 

:idiot2:

 

Spurs definitely don't have the worst batch of 4 strikers from that list.

 

 

 

I think they do, they've got a good bunch of strikers but think they got the weakest from the list. This is mainly because I think Torres will be awesome this season.

 

 

nope. they have one of the best strike forces no doubt.

 

 

Man U and Arsenal top? ManU only have 3 strikers, yet are top? no matter how good they are, that's bollux. Arsenal second? why? Van Persie is the only player on that list who i would rate as better than any of the spurs or liverpool strikers, or better than any of our top 3, Chelsea's top 3 or ManU's top 2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think there is really a simple answer to that one.

 

I suppose you could go off how many league goals each player would score and total them up, so here would be mine off the top of my head.

 

Us- Owen (18), Viduka (15), Martins (10),  Ameobi (6) (Total:49)

 

Liverpool- Torres (18), Crouch (16), Kuyt (11), Vorinin (-8-) (Total:53)

 

Man Utd- Rooney (15), Saha (12), Anderson (6), Tevez (14) (Total:47)

 

Arsenal- Adebayor (11), Van Persie (13), De Silva (15), Bentner (6) (Total:45)

 

Chelsea- Drogba (23), Pizzaro (10), Shevchenko (16), Kalou (5) (Total:54)

 

Spurs- Berbatov (18), Keane (12), Defoe (10), Bent (15) (Total:55)

 

I've removed Smith so everyone has 4 strikers each and i also think he'll be a mid anyway.

 

Martins scored only one less league goal then Berbatov last season and played two less game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Us- Owen, Viduka, Martins, Smith and Ameobi

 

Liverpool- Torres, Crouch, Kuyt, Vorinin

 

Man Utd- Rooney, Saha, Tevez?

 

Arsenal- Adebayor, Van Persie, De Silva, Bentner

 

Chelsea- Drogba, Pizzaro, Shevchenko, Kalou

 

Spurs- Berbatov, Keane, Defoe, Bent

 

 

 

 

 

Removed anderson because he isn't a striker.

 

We are 3rd imo behind spurs and liverpool, but by far the most injury prone.

 

Behind Spurs? Come on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think there is really a simple answer to that one.

 

I suppose you could go off how many league goals each player would score and total them up, so here would be mine off the top of my head.

 

Us- Owen (18), Viduka (15), Martins (10),  Ameobi (6) (Total:49)

 

Liverpool- Torres (18), Crouch (16), Kuyt (11), Vorinin (-8-) (Total:53)

 

Man Utd- Rooney (15), Saha (12), Anderson (6), Tevez (14) (Total:47)

 

Arsenal- Adebayor (11), Van Persie (13), De Silva (15), Bentner (6) (Total:45)

 

Chelsea- Drogba (23), Pizzaro (10), Shevchenko (16), Kalou (5) (Total:54)

 

Spurs- Berbatov (18), Keane (12), Defoe (10), Bent (15) (Total:55)

 

I've removed Smith so everyone has 4 strikers each and i also think he'll be a mid anyway.

 

Martins scored only one less league goal then Berbatov last season and played two less game.

 

Martins is going to get a lot less games though if Owen stays fit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blackburn have quite a good strike force also and i don't know wheather anyone agrees or have just fogotten about them or don't realise they have good strengh and depth.

 

McCarthy ( No need to comment )

Santa Cruz ( Looks to be a good striker )

Derbyshire ( Good for present and future )

Rigters ( Young,energetic and one for the future,looked good at u21's )

Roberts ( Decent cover,strong,holds the ball up well and brings others into play )

 

Good call.

 

Derbyshire is top like. My house mate is a Blackburn fan so I see a lot of their games. Good side really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...