Ishmael Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 That's brilliant from Pards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 This has got the makings of a fantastic rom-com. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Serious question, would you sign anything if Pardew kept smiling at you? Would you fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Its a true insight into Pardew's man management right there, same tactic he uses on players wives. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Title change surely? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimplyAnth Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Inspired man-management from Pards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Title change surely? To what? "Enrique smiles at Pardew"? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Must be a title change. What a fucking line. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 He was smiling at Enrique as he got out of the ice bath however. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 It's not like the players who have left have been playing for free either. Nolan and Routledge out versus Cayabe and Marveaux in is fairly even I'd have thought... Smoke and mirrors man. Any excuse is trotted out and some people swallow the lot. £20m in wages.... Give the fuck over. Routledge was probably on half the wage Marveaux is on. Love how xiscos wages goes up 10 grand for each year he's here Pretty sure the £50k wage rumour was going round when we first signed him. Who knows how true it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/1743/alanpardew968185465.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Pardew: Enrique smiles at me! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 "Pard's Smiles At Jose, Jose Smiles Back (more than once)" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Title change surely? To what? "Enrique smiles at Pardew"? Something imaginative on those lines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 This salary s*** has been a joke on here this summer. Can't believe we've been reduced to including five-year contract estimations into player acquisitions. Do we have no other regular income to cover those costs year-on-year like? I've been wondering about that, if as we have been told that all new contracts(wages), Tiote, Barton (if he signs), the new players, Ba, Cabaye, Marvin, Abeid and now Eggyhead..........have been factored into the £35m, does that not mean that any outgoing turnover from the club can't include the wages of those players for the term of their contracts, as they are already paid in advance so to speak. If the club include those players wages for the year in next years accounts as an expense going out, why ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 I would do whatever Pardew wanted, he is pretty dreamy like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 I would do whatever Pardew wanted, on the basis that if I didn't he'd probably shag my Gran. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 This salary s*** has been a joke on here this summer. Can't believe we've been reduced to including five-year contract estimations into player acquisitions. Do we have no other regular income to cover those costs year-on-year like? I've been wondering about that, if as we have been told that all new contracts(wages), Tiote, Barton (if he signs), the new players, Ba, Cabaye, Marvin, Abeid and now Eggyhead..........have been factored into the £35m, does that not mean that any outgoing turnover from the club can't include the wages of those players for the term of their contracts, as they are already paid in advance so to speak. If the club include those players wages for the year in next years accounts as an expense going out, why ? Who's actually said all of that is coming out of the Carroll fee though? I think its a misunderstanding coming from the fact that the Carroll fee will go into the clubs revenue and all costs will come out of that revenue. Not that the exact way its working is really that important if the end result is money coming in and not going back into the squad (or at least a significant portion of it). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 This salary s*** has been a joke on here this summer. Can't believe we've been reduced to including five-year contract estimations into player acquisitions. Do we have no other regular income to cover those costs year-on-year like? I've been wondering about that, if as we have been told that all new contracts(wages), Tiote, Barton (if he signs), the new players, Ba, Cabaye, Marvin, Abeid and now Eggyhead..........have been factored into the £35m, does that not mean that any outgoing turnover from the club can't include the wages of those players for the term of their contracts, as they are already paid in advance so to speak. If the club include those players wages for the year in next years accounts as an expense going out, why ? Who's actually said all of that is coming out of the Carroll fee though? I think its a misunderstanding coming from the fact that the Carroll fee will go into the clubs revenue and all costs will come out of that revenue. Not that the exact way its working is really that important if the end result is money coming in and not going back into the squad (or at leasr a significant portion of it). Course it is, but never let the facts get in the way of a good whinge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 :howudoin: http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/1743/alanpardew968185465.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexthegreat Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 "There's been no bids for José and I want him to stay. I keep looking at him and smiling. He smiles back but he hasn't signed the contract yet and that is a problem." http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/aug/07/newcastle-united-alan-pardew I see hes using similar tactics on Barton: "Me and Joey will have a couple of texts and take it from there." Little bit presumptuous? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Pardew doesn't presume, he consumes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Pardew doesn't presume, he consumes. He consumates. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 This salary s*** has been a joke on here this summer. Can't believe we've been reduced to including five-year contract estimations into player acquisitions. Do we have no other regular income to cover those costs year-on-year like? I've been wondering about that, if as we have been told that all new contracts(wages), Tiote, Barton (if he signs), the new players, Ba, Cabaye, Marvin, Abeid and now Eggyhead..........have been factored into the £35m, does that not mean that any outgoing turnover from the club can't include the wages of those players for the term of their contracts, as they are already paid in advance so to speak. If the club include those players wages for the year in next years accounts as an expense going out, why ? Who's actually said all of that is coming out of the Carroll fee though? I think its a misunderstanding coming from the fact that the Carroll fee will go into the clubs revenue and all costs will come out of that revenue. Not that the exact way its working is really that important if the end result is money coming in and not going back into the squad (or at least a significant portion of it). From what i recall Pardew said free transfers aren't cheap nowadays, agents/signing on fees, etc, It was in direct answer to questions about the £35m, thats why most people refer to it, even if you disregard the Carroll money, he definitely commented on whatever money available is covering the length of a contract, if thats the case they can't count any future years wages as an expense on a balance sheet. Problems as always is there is a lot of guess work going on as we are told nothing, generally we are going by whatever snippets we get from Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 This salary s*** has been a joke on here this summer. Can't believe we've been reduced to including five-year contract estimations into player acquisitions. Do we have no other regular income to cover those costs year-on-year like? I've been wondering about that, if as we have been told that all new contracts(wages), Tiote, Barton (if he signs), the new players, Ba, Cabaye, Marvin, Abeid and now Eggyhead..........have been factored into the £35m, does that not mean that any outgoing turnover from the club can't include the wages of those players for the term of their contracts, as they are already paid in advance so to speak. If the club include those players wages for the year in next years accounts as an expense going out, why ? Who's actually said all of that is coming out of the Carroll fee though? I think its a misunderstanding coming from the fact that the Carroll fee will go into the clubs revenue and all costs will come out of that revenue. Not that the exact way its working is really that important if the end result is money coming in and not going back into the squad (or at leasr a significant portion of it). Course it is, but never let the facts get in the way of a good whinge. Disappointing. Quite a few people have constantly mentioned the contracts within their imaginary budgets, which is what has been frustrating me and what caused me to write that post. It was in response to someone (Punk77) doing exactly that (in bold) immediately before it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now