TRC Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Yeah he's better but not by a huge amount. Simpson is quicker and doesnt dwell on the ball and try and beat his man sometime putting us under pressure. If we offer Jose 80k a week he will be one of our top earners, when we come to sign a new number 9 they will atelast want parity with a left back, probably more. If I was the main striker at a club I'd be well f***ed off if a left back earned more than me. Where's Enrique wanting £80k come from? I've just browsed this thread, and seen a few 80ks. I thought that was his demands. Fair play if its not. I doubt its about money with Jose anyway, probably about ambition, no matter who the chairman is, it is pretty difficult to keep your best players if you don't have CL or potential to be in the CL. Just look at Villa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 I don't think money will be the deciding factor, he might just be ready for a change and a move to a better club. Even Liverpool have lost a few of their best players in the last couple of seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Yeah he's better but not by a huge amount. Simpson is quicker and doesnt dwell on the ball and try and beat his man sometime putting us under pressure. Simpson isn't nearly as quick as Enrique, I don't think I've ever seen a player out pace him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 I've just browsed this thread, and seen a few 80ks. I thought that was his demands. Fair play if its not. I doubt its about money with Jose anyway, probably about ambition, no matter who the chairman is, it is pretty difficult to keep your best players if you don't have CL or potential to be in the CL. Just look at Villa. I doubt that Enrique has any expectations of us playing CL football very soon, I think if we finish the season reasonably and spend the Carroll money well then he'll see that as progress. The only things he's mentioned that I've seen regarding a new contract is for us to remain in the division before talks can even begin and he's mentioned playing for Spain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Simpson as quick as Enrique?! Jose's fucking lightning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Sad though it is, there can't be much doubt Liverpool would be seen as a more ambitious and powerful club. The new owner has been bullish lately about where he wants to take them, and backed it up with big money and wages spent on Carroll and Suarez. That's the kind of statement top players get their heads turned by. I'm pretty conviced Jose would have been approached months ago. They've got Comolli in there, an experienced operator, doing the deals. As compared to who? Llambias? Their whole set up is much more high powered. Our current "statement" is all about financial stability and self-sufficiency, leading to hard bargaining with agents and high earners over new contracts. As well as constant talk about whether the manager will get all the Carroll money or not. Not something a top footballer trying to maximise his potential in terms of income and playing level is going to want to hear. The wonderful stage of playing for our club should always attract good quality players, but under this regime I reckon the top ones will always want to move on eventually. That Lpool is spending stupid money doesn't necessarily mean that they're more ambitious. They paid over price on Carroll, Johnson and Paulson. Cole flopped. Is this a sound strategy? We're having a more sensible approach, but that's not the same as lack of ambitions. Everybody was satisfied with us staying up this season. The club and players have exceeded our expectations. Is not possible to positive? Can't we wait until after the transfer window before we start criticizing the clubs policy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Heard all this bollocks before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Danny Simpson is a god, and a magnificent specimen of a man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Danny Simpson is a god, and a magnificent specimen of a man. Amazing what a 're-tweet' can do for someone's views on a player, eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 I don't think money will be the deciding factor, he might just be ready for a change and a move to a better club. Even Liverpool have lost a few of their best players in the last couple of seasons. Which English clubs are better? I can understand Man U, Man City, Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs for what they have done or because of financial clout. Other then that, I don't see any better than us if we're at a level a club of our size should be at. People talk about Liverpool, they've only spent money they brought in from the sale of a player, they have spent next to nothing other than that yet they are being talked up as ambitious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Heard all this bollocks before. There's a truth to it though, isn't there? I mean, we know how futile and harmful it can be to 'show ambition' by just splashing money around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Heard all this bollocks before. There's a truth to it though, isn't there? I mean, we know how futile and harmful it can be to 'show ambition' by just splashing money around. Key point in bold right there. To some people spending more than £5m and/or keeping hold of good players is one step away from being Portsmouth. That club which doesn't exist any more, remember. Our lot keep going on and on about how good their scouting team is. But in actual fact they don't trust them that much at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wil Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Sad though it is, there can't be much doubt Liverpool would be seen as a more ambitious and powerful club. The new owner has been bullish lately about where he wants to take them, and backed it up with big money and wages spent on Carroll and Suarez. That's the kind of statement top players get their heads turned by. I'm pretty conviced Jose would have been approached months ago. They've got Comolli in there, an experienced operator, doing the deals. As compared to who? Llambias? Their whole set up is much more high powered. Our current "statement" is all about financial stability and self-sufficiency, leading to hard bargaining with agents and high earners over new contracts. As well as constant talk about whether the manager will get all the Carroll money or not. Not something a top footballer trying to maximise his potential in terms of income and playing level is going to want to hear. The wonderful stage of playing for our club should always attract good quality players, but under this regime I reckon the top ones will always want to move on eventually. That Lpool is spending stupid money doesn't necessarily mean that they're more ambitious. They paid over price on Carroll, Johnson and Paulson. Cole flopped. Is this a sound strategy? We're having a more sensible approach, but that's not the same as lack of ambitions. Everybody was satisfied with us staying up this season. The club and players have exceeded our expectations. Is not possible to positive? Can't we wait until after the transfer window before we start criticizing the clubs policy? Wasn't saying Liverpool are great, or that I wasn't pleased with how we've done this season. We've done really well. Just trying to see this from a player's point of view. that's all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Ashley Cole is better defensively than Enrique. Jussaying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Ashley Cole is better defensively than Enrique. Jussaying. Ashley Cole is 5 years older than him though ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Ashley Cole is better defensively than Enrique. Jussaying. Debatable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Sad though it is, there can't be much doubt Liverpool would be seen as a more ambitious and powerful club. The new owner has been bullish lately about where he wants to take them, and backed it up with big money and wages spent on Carroll and Suarez. That's the kind of statement top players get their heads turned by. I'm pretty conviced Jose would have been approached months ago. They've got Comolli in there, an experienced operator, doing the deals. As compared to who? Llambias? Their whole set up is much more high powered. Our current "statement" is all about financial stability and self-sufficiency, leading to hard bargaining with agents and high earners over new contracts. As well as constant talk about whether the manager will get all the Carroll money or not. Not something a top footballer trying to maximise his potential in terms of income and playing level is going to want to hear. The wonderful stage of playing for our club should always attract good quality players, but under this regime I reckon the top ones will always want to move on eventually. That Lpool is spending stupid money doesn't necessarily mean that they're more ambitious. They paid over price on Carroll, Johnson and Paulson. Cole flopped. Is this a sound strategy? We're having a more sensible approach, but that's not the same as lack of ambitions. Everybody was satisfied with us staying up this season. The club and players have exceeded our expectations. Is not possible to positive? Can't we wait until after the transfer window before we start criticizing the clubs policy? Wasn't saying Liverpool are great, or that I wasn't pleased with how we've done this season. We've done really well. Just trying to see this from a player's point of view. that's all. Doesn't even need to be over-analyzed to that extent. Ultimately, they're Liverpool and we're Newcastle, its obvious which club any professional would be more attracted to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Ashley Cole is better defensively than Enrique. Jussaying. Ashley Cole is 5 years older than him though ... And does a lot more offensively too. Not as easy to defend when you're always pushing forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Sad though it is, there can't be much doubt Liverpool would be seen as a more ambitious and powerful club. The new owner has been bullish lately about where he wants to take them, and backed it up with big money and wages spent on Carroll and Suarez. That's the kind of statement top players get their heads turned by. I'm pretty conviced Jose would have been approached months ago. They've got Comolli in there, an experienced operator, doing the deals. As compared to who? Llambias? Their whole set up is much more high powered. Our current "statement" is all about financial stability and self-sufficiency, leading to hard bargaining with agents and high earners over new contracts. As well as constant talk about whether the manager will get all the Carroll money or not. Not something a top footballer trying to maximise his potential in terms of income and playing level is going to want to hear. The wonderful stage of playing for our club should always attract good quality players, but under this regime I reckon the top ones will always want to move on eventually. That Lpool is spending stupid money doesn't necessarily mean that they're more ambitious. They paid over price on Carroll, Johnson and Paulson. Cole flopped. Is this a sound strategy? We're having a more sensible approach, but that's not the same as lack of ambitions. Everybody was satisfied with us staying up this season. The club and players have exceeded our expectations. Is not possible to positive? Can't we wait until after the transfer window before we start criticizing the clubs policy? Wasn't saying Liverpool are great, or that I wasn't pleased with how we've done this season. We've done really well. Just trying to see this from a player's point of view. that's all. Doesn't even need to be over-analyzed to that extent. Ultimately, they're Liverpool and we're Newcastle, its obvious which club any professional would be more attracted to. ooooooooooooooo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Danny Simpson is a god, and a magnificent specimen of a man. Amazing what a 're-tweet' can do for someone's views on a player, eh? I'm not sure what this is? I've had my tongue up his arse for a while now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Meh, you can't keep a player who doesn't want to stay . On to the next one is all i have to say on this subject. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Meh, you can't keep a player who doesn't want to stay . On to the next one is all i have to say on this subject. It could be beneficial if we address the reason he doesn't want to stay if that's indeed the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Meh, you can't keep a player who doesn't want to stay . On to the next one is all i have to say on this subject. It could be beneficial if we address the reason he doesn't want to stay. Yeh, Pardew should be doing that. Who knows though, he might not like the area. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Just sell him, if he doesn't want to be here then get the money and spend the money. The problem obviously that the majority of the money recieved for Enrique would be saved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 It's depressing that if he does go you can bet your bottom dollar the club will portray him as a greedy twat. Even more depressing is the number of fans that will evidently accept that without question. Again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now