Jump to content

Old thread about a potential Icelandic takeover bid years ago


Power NUFC

Recommended Posts

I have a question, and i hope someone knows the answer, cos i can't be arsed reading through 8 pages of people arguing about stability and ownership:

 

What do the Icelandics do? I mean by that, where is their money from?

 

Because, frankly, if its not more glamourous/less crap than biscuits, i'm not interested in them owning our club.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question, and i hope someone knows the answer, cos i can't be arsed reading through 8 pages of people arguing about stability and ownership:

 

What do the Icelandics do? I mean by that, where is their money from?

 

Because, frankly, if its not more glamourous/less crap than biscuits, i'm not interested in them owning our club.

 

 

 

Mostly, they seem to own retail enterprises -- like Ashley.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thinkk I know what's going on ...

 

Basically, all of the foreigners who have been trying to buy the club from Shepherd and his clan all of these years are now trying it on again. They didn't have a chance because Shepherd was anti aliens and was holding out for the "Geordie Abramovich" and so now he's gone, they're trying to get the club off Mike Ashley who doesn't see himself as the Geordie defender of the universe.

 

I don't expect MA to budge though. Especially not at such an awkward time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thinkk I know what's going on ...

 

Basically, all of the foreigners who have been trying to buy the club from Shepherd and his clan all of these years are now trying it on again. They didn't have a chance because Shepherd was anti aliens and was holding out for the "Geordie Abramovich" and so now he's gone, they're trying to get the club off Mike Ashley who doesn't see himself as the Geordie defender of the universe.

 

I don't expect MA to budge though. Especially not at such an awkward time.

 

interesting point that, i wonder if, with all the comments from john hall regarding ashley as being the perfect person to take us forward etc etc, that there could have been some sort of clause written into the deal so he couldnt sell the club on at a profit within a certain time frame? i dont suppose its likely though, seems as if it would have been more of a gentlemans agreement, or that it wasnt even mentioned and that they were just happy to sell up to someone english and to hell with what they did once the club was theirs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest shearer_united

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

No we didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BooBoo

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

I really hope this nonsensical rhubarb is an attempt at irony!

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

I really hope this nonsensical rhubarb is an attempt at irony!

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

Couldnt agree more if I was a complete fucking spastic

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

Legend :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

 

 

 

Part in bold is a bit sad, not really funny  but the rest  :lol:  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This will never happen imo, probably just made up by the Icelandic people because they're bored  :laugh2:

Yeah we got nothing better do with our time than making up stories of Icelandic millionaires trying to buy a mediocre football club. Think again you twat   :knuppel2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been mentioned in skysports.com

 

anyway, why not give that a shot ? to be really honest i lost my faith in us winning a lot of matches (Fergie tipped us to reach top 4) but it doesn't seem like that especially since we lost home to a weak club that comes by the name of Aston Villa .. too weak to even be named Aston Martin..

 

Anyway, Since Ashley coming in.. I dont think it was ever right appointing Ashley.. Eriksson should have been the right manager for us..

 

Now with the new hopeful takeover happening and since money isnt an issue anymore, Big Phil should be appointed.

 

Greatest gibberish ever written on this forum.  :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This will never happen imo, probably just made up by the Icelandic people because they're bored  :laugh2:

Yeah we got nothing better do with our time than making up stories of Icelandic millionaires trying to buy a mediocre football club. Think again you t***  :knuppel2:

 

oooooooooooh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...