...because Coloccini has done more this season, is the simple answer.
Did or didn't Taylor play very well this season up until his knee injury?
Williamson has looked better than Taylor alongside Colo in my John Humble.
That said I've always been a bit of a Taylor sceptic. He seems very good at talking the talk but as a centre back I do believe he's guilty of always looking for the Hollywood tackle.
Probably something that a lot of supporters don't want to admit but true nonetheless. Doesn't mean that Taylor has done badly, just brings a bit of perspective to the debate.
we are a different set up at home since dropping the smith or butt idea. that may be part of it.
I just think that Williamson is a more dominating centre half especially in the air, which compliments Coloccini well.
I agree, I do like Taylor though and am not sure about this whole "yeah good, glad the cockney got knocked out" stuff that is starting to appear.
Ok he is the "all action hero" a bit of a tit but a harmless one and I think his heart is in the right place so I don't understand why some sections seem to really have it in for him.
Taylor is a Jack of all trades but master of none at the moment. He's the Aaron Hughes of this generation which is why we get seasoned posters suggesting he play right back. I still see him as a good prospect at CB but he's got way above himself. Whether he's worth what he thinks he is I highly doubt.
Is that the Aaron Hughes that we should never have sold and ended up replacing with invariably inferior players??
Spot on.