Teasy

the club was making a loss, and how do you know money wasn't available? but just not spent? also there is no reason to think it was going to be spent on transfers, and last season i think he invested a bit more than £20million. The club was making a loss when Freddy was spending massive transfer fee's on the likes of Owen. We would not be making a loss now with such a small amount of money being spend on transfers, we'll be making profit, especially with the extra TV money. I'm sure money was available, I've always been one of the people who's said that just because money isn't spent it doesn't mean its not available. But I don't believe for a second that amount of money was available. Last season we spent something like £8 million on transfers by the way. This season around £4 million.

So then you're saying that Freddy Shepherd subsidised Newcastle United, because he took out loans?.. Of course loans have to be paid off, when did I say they didn't? But the likes of Shepherd and Ashley don't pay them! They are paid off by payments that come from revenue. Just like they were under Shepherd, just like they still are under Ashley. The same revenue that a fans consortium would have available to it. What is your actual point here anyway? My point is that any fans consortium would have the same money available to it as any Newcastle owner in the past. None of them have actually put in personal money to pay players wages, or for club running costs or transfers, so why should it be a concern for a fans consortium? BTW yet again Ashley paid off the mortgage on the stadium, not past transfer fee's ect

More like misleading really. Who knows, you might be right he might have meant money from his own personal bank account, so there should have been spare revenue from the last two seasons plus £40 million from Ashley available for transfers this summer, anyone believe that?

He said he was willing to subsidise up to £20 million a year. Not that now we'll ever get to find out if he would have or not. How much would you bet against that "subsidy" being from club revenue, yeah technically its his money since he owns the club, but its money generated by the club itself.

Read your own post and you should see that if debt was used to subsidise the club's running costs and he them paid off that debt then he's subsidising the running costs. Where has it been said that the only debt he paid off was the stadium debt. In fact what difference does it make? It all goes on the same balance sheet at the end of the day. I knew what you meant, but its pedantic and not relevant to what I was talking about. James claims a fans consortium couldn't afford to subsidise operating costs, wages and transfers, I'm saying that those things are not subsidised by owners. They come from club revenue and in the case of transfers sometimes bank loans in the past. The fact that Ashley found he had to pay off the mortgage on the stadium when he took over due to the contract the bank had with the Hall's doesn't change that fact.

When did he subsidise operating costs wages or transfer fee's?, never is the answer. He invested £100 million to pay off stadium debt, completely different thing. The fact is it doesn't require subsidising as revenue covers it, the only thing that could use subsidising is transfer fee's and if a fans consortium did that it would be the first time in Newcastle history.. Not saying I think fan ownership will actually happen by the way, at least this time around..

What are you on about?, tell me which owner in the past has ever subsidised operating costs, wages or transfers at Newcastle United? Nobody has, its all paid for from club revenue (match tickets, TV money, merchandise) and bank loans ect.. How would any of that change should the club be owned by the fans? They aren't going to give away a season ticket for life to share owners you know...

Eh?

That offer is extremely low, but that's no reason not to turn up to the planned meeting, that's no way to negotiate, its scompletely unprofessional. He's probably burnt his bridges now in Dubai, what a tosser!

They look fuck all alike.. Also you could get beaten up in some bar in Chester-le-Street just for looking at someone the wrong way never mind looking like Mike Ashley, which he doesn't anyway

Aye, actually. Do measure success in how quickly he does it? How much are you willing to bet that the club is worth more than double what it is now in three years? How come the season tickets are going up for next year? He's pissing millions away, apparently. Why does he need an extra £20 off me? Naive beyond belief. If he ends up selling for £450 million then you'd have a point. I can't see him getting that though.

So when he does something good like pays off £100 million of debt he's only paying off "his debt" but when he does something bad he's making a fool of "our club". Do you ever post anything positive you miserable little person? And? The fact that he paid off those debts is still a good thing, it just doesn't prove he currently has the best interests of the club at heart that's all.

It was supposed to be Jimenez that was in Dubai yesterday, so Ashley also now being there could mean something is developing.

who scored? For the Spuds?, it was a deflected goal from Bent. Definite Bent goal? i had a bet on he would score at some point in the game Yeah, Jenas had a shot and it deflected off bent and went in so it has to be Bents.

who scored? For the Spuds?, it was a deflected goal from Bent.

1:2 to Villa

Fucking hell what a miss from the crazy frog!!!!

Lucky fuckers!

Nah we can still laugh at other clubs, its a temporary relief from our own problems. You have to admit its pretty funny that yet again they've had a supposedly great transfer window and have and apparently have an amazing world renowned manager, yet are currently bottom of the league.

I don't feel sorry for them at all, because despite failing every time they never get called on it by the press. They just get "Well they had a bad time last year because *insert excuse* but next year they'll be great". We get slaughtered at every opportunity.

If he didn't then pass that £100 million onto the next club owner then you'd have a point, but he will so its cost him nothing.

You're probably remembering the last reported wage bill from 2006/7, which was £1.2 million per week (£62.5 million per year).

Nah not the least funny.

Where do you get that number from?

Only one billion dollars between the two though, the competition between them to have the most money must be fierce Well buying us is a sure way to lose out in that sibling rivalry. Assets are taken into account so it shouldn't make much difference. Though hopefully it won't mean his brother will follow him, he probably will and will buy the Spuds, oh the laughs those two will have over an evening game of Premiership Monopoly