lovejoy

is barton due back for this? huge if so.

im not even sure 9 is enough. have you seen boro and hulls run ins? 9 will be enough imo

i think 5 points may keep us up, i think 7 points definatly will. whether we get them or not is another matter like.

he predicts that 5 points will keep us up, as hull wont get another point and boro will only get 2 more, has us staying up on goal difference. still a twat though

fact.

This yep. cant see him dropping butt and nolan though.

Just been on loook north - we were 'torn to shreds, just torn to shreds', like f*** we were, also critical of shearer getting them all over for instructions during a break in play (dawson being injured), on what basis im not sure, the bloke is a t***.

TWAT - FACT

i thought smith did well when he came on tbf

Mistake?? Er, yeah. Butterfingers. Didn't think he done that much wrong tbh. Have to see it again though i think. He should have done far, far better. harsh iyam, the first one was a good save, just bad luck imo

we dont beat pompey, and its bye bye

how fucking bad is butt?? jesus. needs to change it at half time

what else can he say? Just on about the professionalism he's tried to bring in, with strict timekeeping etc. Thinks it's already having a big effect. i asked what else can he say about kinnear? i watched the interview, usual stuff really.

what else can he say?

injured, injured, injured, injured, injured.

he's injured.

this. dont think i would have went with the 3 centre halves either though

a lot of papers have gone for this, but with smith in instead of nolan.

can we just end it there? surely that sums the whole debate up? By editing out the second part though you're omitting the hypocrisy. I'm more than willing to admit things are s*** at the minute. NE5 is completely unwilling to admit anything but instead prefers to point-score. Over and over and over again. Fair comment though, I'm not going to persue it any more in this thread. I guess the answer (or not) to the question above will tell its own story. exactly, if he comes back with a yes, then its done and dusted! I've made my reply, and I have to say, I'm surprised that you are taking this stance mate i'm bored man, and i'm not the only one.

can we just end it there? surely that sums the whole debate up? By editing out the second part though you're omitting the hypocrisy. I'm more than willing to admit things are s*** at the minute. NE5 is completely unwilling to admit anything but instead prefers to point-score. Over and over and over again. Fair comment though, I'm not going to persue it any more in this thread. I guess the answer (or not) to the question above will tell its own story. exactly, if he comes back with a yes, then its done and dusted!

can we just end it there? surely that sums the whole debate up? By editing out the second part though you're omitting the hypocrisy. I'm more than willing to admit things are s*** at the minute. NE5 is completely unwilling to admit anything but instead prefers to point-score. Over and over and over again. Fair comment though, I'm not going to persue it any more in this thread. I guess the answer (or not) to the question above will tell its own story. didnt mean that against you in any way, or ne5 tbh, it just shows that we all accept that at times it was great, but we will never know if we would have went bust etc, as he isnt here anymore. its best left at that imo, this has been going on for years and will carry on for years to come if it isnt just agreed to disagree?

can we just end it there? surely that sums the whole debate up?

oba fit by the looks of things. 4-3-3 for me with oba, carroll and owen.

it is pennant, i spent months trying to work it out, and was disappointed to find out it was him. anti cliamx indeed.

i have to say i noticed it, but this has been blown way out.