Jump to content

dcmk

Member
  • Posts

    4,316
  • Joined

Everything posted by dcmk

  1. We have no right hand side. Lovenkrands has been invisible, 'vali looks woeful, Nolan can't play in 442 and Harewood looks like he cant be fucked. Great stuff
  2. When i receive wages in about 2 weeks time, i will get on this
  3. dcmk

    Jonas Gutierrez

    'You do the math'
  4. dcmk

    The England Thread

    Brilliant isn't he? Reminds me of Dyer as a wing back, brilliant at getting forward, produces from that position against poor sides, but is s**** at defending. Liverpool probably paid treble his value in the summer. and has been one of their best players.
  5. dcmk

    The England Thread

    Forgot about Defoe. Still think Bent is overrated, he's got a cheek complaining he's not in the squad. well id be pissed off if i was not in the squad and i was scoring regularly while someone who ain't even starting for his club and scores once in a blue moon is ahead of me, wouldnt you? Scoring regularly is a bit of an overstatement, should we just pick every English player who scores the most in between international breaks? Bent is on a good scoring run at the moment but he's not a top striker. Check his record.. he is a 1 goal in 2 games striker his entire career. Show me someone in the England squad who betters his.
  6. dcmk

    Can we?

    Fixed. I take it your not a fan of Moat's takeover bid. What would you prefer to happen?
  7. I saw the highlights of the goals. As I said, which you can't seem to comprehend, if a keeper is exposed loads he's obviously going to make more mistakes. His constant defense of Colo is essentially the same as what you wrote but with 'midfield', 'butt', 'nolan' in his post instead.
  8. dcmk

    RIP sale thread.

    well.. what problems did they cause? We realised we had a incompetent owner.. so he wanted to leave? you are blaming us for that?? Well in no particular order.. MA tried to sell the club, but his asking price was too high. He appointed JFK He didnt strengthen in January. The structure of the club was never clear. He sold our most valuable players. He had no contingency plan. He filled valuable positions like DoF with people with no experience. What did the fans do?
  9. dcmk

    RIP sale thread.

    The match day thread during a game is a perfect example of why this is a terrible idea.
  10. Well I certainly question this short sighted honour and principle. Misplaced righteousness it might be with Keegan. I guess he was only looking out for number one instead of the short term sporting future of the club and its fans. I'd argue stronger principles might have seen him fight our corner given that he knew first hand how ridiculous the regime was being. Did you know SBR got money out of the club through compensation? Did he care about the short term sporting future of the club or its fans in doing that? Nope, he was looking out for number one instead huh?
  11. Access to massive funds is what i said was required, Target of the mega rich is also what I said... It was a genuine question. Man City, Chelsea, who else has a mega rich owner or is being targeted by them? Only one i can think of is the Russian at Arsenal who is slowly buying up shares
  12. A team with that amount of quality in front of goal, cant be so easily written off imo.
  13. I wish Barca would grab another mind.
  14. It's making me worry, im not watching the match.. I hope that Almeria aren't posing any kind of threat. I have a lot of money on Barca.
  15. Run across the football pitch naked?
  16. I would have Keegan back. He was doing a good job, in a clear structure, with an owner who understands what is required to run a football club he will do well.
  17. It is absolutely clear that Keegan did not willingly drop his claim for the other £23 million. He attempted to overturn the clause in his contract that specified his compensation at £2 million. When his claim for that was dismissed, he accepted that there was no point in carrying on. The tribunal actually went on to say that even if they had been asked to pronounce on the question of damages to his reputation and future earnings, he would not have been given anything. If he had been 'happy to accept the £2 million', he wouldn't have launched the other parts of the claim in the first place. A lot of posters seem to think that just because Ashley and co have been criticised, that Keegan is completely in the right, not just in law, but in moral terms. As far as I'm concerned, he's won 1 out of 3 of his legal battles, and lost the moral ground completely. I tell you, quite honestly, I was surprised by what has emerged. It was looking like the only player that could possibly have been foisted on him against his wishes was Gonzalez, but like many people I couldn't quite believe that Keegan would resign over that one loan signing. I thought that maybe there had to be something dodgy about Xisco's arrival or maybe one or two of the others - that Keegan had perhaps bitten his tongue over a number of weeks and then finally cracked. If many others on here were to be honest, they'd admit to that as well. It now appears that he was involved in all the other incomings and it all rested on the one minor instance, where I suspect Wise and co had lost patience with the bloke and acted in haste and in temper. I also didn't believe the £25 million story when it hit the papers. I didn't think it was a smear from the club, but I thought it was just a wild piece of tabloid speculation. I thought it was a ridiculous amount to claim and again I think if many people on here were being honest they would admit that they were harbouring the same doubts. Both elements of the story have turned out to be true and I'm a bit disgusted. My regard for the bloke, never high at the start, has gone down even further, if that's possible. I strongly suspect that, deep down, many of those who have supported Keegan throughout all this have also had their confidence dented, whether they are prepared to admit it to themselves or not. Wrong
  18. Eh? There's a massive f***ing section about how it wasn't made clear to Keegan that he wouldn't be in charge of signings. That's the basis of the entire outcome, that Keegan took the job in good faith and was repeatedly misled. Not only that, the club were deliberately lying to the fans (that includes you, I think) and not telling Keegan the 'real' position. If it wasn't clear -- and it clearly wasn't -- he should have acted on his misgivings and said no before all this bollocks started. That's what I wish he'd done. As for being lied to, when have we not been? Freddie was hardly the paragon of Truth and Honesty. KK's told a few porkies in his time, too. It hardly changes anyone's opinion of Ashley, does it? We know he's crap. Wow your argument has been reduced to '..well everybody lies'. Just give up, its sad that you can't even admit that Keegan was right to walk out. His contract of employment was trampled over, and he still had hope of a return. Until the 'final final straw' when they basically said 'fuck you will have no say what so ever if you come back'
  19. Don't bother quoting parts of it then, to back up your statement. A manager refuses to use YouTube, a manager who was told he has the final say and didn't, a manager who didn't give up hope of coming back to the club - until NUFC statement saying he will not have final say if he were to return... ..soft in the head aye.
  20. Not supporting a club because of a single person. That is pretty small minded.
  21. Hah signing players based on YouTube, what utter cretins
×
×
  • Create New...