Ronaldo

I wonder if that bald little bastard from The Chronicle somehow gets wind of this. Can't write for shite, but he certainly has his sources.

Let's hope the fee is reasonable.

Wouldn't happen. He's not ready to retire. Not sure he ever will be.

It's quite incredible he still has not managed a goal in a league start for Man U, like. Even Lovenrkands would manage that. Shefki Kuqi, even.

Must say, I wouldn't mind us putting another defensive midfielder in the starting Xl. There's a lot to be said for not conceding goals - look at City; their defence isn't that much better than ours. I want us to be a team that other teams need to take risks against.

Come on Ronaldo you're better than that. With Liverpool he averaged a minimum of 1 goal in 2 in every single season bar one. League goals should always be the benchmark. Owen's had 10+ seasons in the premiership and he never reached 20 goals is astounding and shows he was not a great striker IMO. Just look at his record man. Ridiculous statement. 97-98 18 in 36 98-99 18 in 30 99-00 11 in 27 00-01 16 in 28 01-02 19 in 29 02-03 19 in 35 03-04 16 in 29 He was a very good goalscorer at this peak, no doubt about it. But he was never a Drogba, Henry or Shearer. He wasn't a great player.

Stop being a biased, lying little runt.

He isn't what we need right now at all. Why not?

You didn't misconstrue anything. You fabricated a quote to support your own stupid arguement. And yes, Williamson is basically all of the above. But he's also proved himself - especially over the last few months - to be a good defender, unlike your mate. Enough.

It won't take him long to get 20 PL goals, like. Owen never managed it. Every other aspect of his game is streets ahead.

As late as February, you were saying Williamson was utter gash and Taylor had to replace him, having said you'd rather have Taylor than Joleon Lescott playing alongside Colo. Link me to this post in February, please. Complete lies, btw. And what on earth has Joleon Lescott got to do with Mike Williamson? Stop mentioning him. He's another shocking defender, just like your pal. Here you go: Jan 17: Taylor's also a more capable defender (than Williamson). Jan 17: Taylor clearly has the better attributes. I'm not a big fan of his, but he's far more capable than Williamson. Jan 17: Not saying that Taylor is ideal, either. But he's got a lot more going for him. Feb 7: Lescott has ability but he's not an ideal partner for Coloccini. Rather have Saylor alongside Colo. Feb 7: He (Williamson) can and will be dropped the second Saylor is fit. And rightly so. Feb 15: It's been years since Taylor's been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Feb 19: Taylor's far better in the air. Right. And where is 'utter gash'? I maintain most of what i've said there. Although obviously i've changed my mind about the pecking order, given that Williamson's really stepped up and Taylor looks worse than ever. Just stop it, seriously.

I think Williamson should be on that list for the same reason Simpson is.

It might just be, you know.

Enough's enough, like.

They both do, for me.

Ginola never had a season for us like Robert did in 03-04.

Eh? Have you seen the table recently? Would appear not mate, forest it is You're lovely.

You'd have thought the club would have helped him bring his dog over, for crying out loud.

Think it's far more ridiculous to leave Robert out, tbh. Best winger i've ever seen at the club by a mile.

Only Ethi has.

yet despite his supposed quality how many of the real big games has he started in for man united? There's nothing supposed about it.

Look at the defence, mate. It's an absolute shambles.

Another one. Look at the table, bud.

Swansea should do it for me.