Ronaldo

Ive given you 6 if you keep up. Nearly, keep trying. Only 3 of those came in the last minute though, so all of that research appears to be a waste of your precious time.

No, it was 3. And guess what? You're on average four times more likely to score in the 90th than you are in any other minute of the game. See if you and that incredible intellect can figure out why.

I'm sure you also enjoyed getting beat by Blackburn at home? Drawing with Bolton and Boro? 5-1 against Man U? As much as most of you would like to spin it. You cannot conclusively point to Keegan's results and say he did a better job that season. Asthetically he did, certainly. But that isn't a factor in the question of relegation.

You're an absolute joker man, Allardyce won more points. I can understand that bothering you but there it is.

Three? One at which point were already leading.

Anyone would think we'd struggled to 13 points under Allardyce and Keegan had come in and got 30. We had a poor squad, both managers did OK with it.

We lost those fucking games and still survived, they're completely irrelevant to this arguement.

Alright Wumer. Some people just seem determined to perpetuate this 'poor defence' myth. I'll tell you something, if we didn't have a good defence we'd be no higher than 10th in this league.

Don't see how any of that suggests he's have taken us down tbh, pointless arguement.

Bad defence, poor finishers.

Nobody has said any different. Will he take them down? No chance. Would he have taken us down? Same answer.

Did we beat any top 10 teams under Keegan? Nobody is arguing that Allardyce would have taken us to Europe man.

I hope they go bust.

I'm not sure what you're getting at. But beating Everton at home was a good result, as was doing Fulham away. By December we'd accumulated 26 points, that's hardly a blueprint for relegation.

Ripped apart? Against who?

He's absolutely brilliant in the championship and wasn't that bad in the premiership either. Not talk about his skills (which admittedly are sub-par), I'm talking more about his attitude. We don't need any more shitheads at our club. Fair enough, that's a reason why we need a manager strong enough to deal with shitheads. On the other side of that, model pros like Nicky Butt and Ryan Taylor tend not to improve team morale when they've made a basic error and lost the team points for the 2nd week running.

He's certainly done horrifically with that wealth of talent at Blackburn.

He's absolutely brilliant in the championship and wasn't that bad in the premiership either.

Which results are the good ones then - the only turn around that we had under Allerdyce was actually managing to get a result away at Bolton. We managed to get butt-f***ed at home against Portsmouth though. That was a good reversal of fortune after managing to hump them for the past couple of seaons.... What?

Not heard that one in a while. Nowt wrong with repeating what i've heard, i've seen plenty links to other forums on here.

£2m is a fair price imo.

Simpson and Khiz were at the back for the Forest game man. These teams manage to score plenty goals when they're not facing our defence, more negative rubbish.

Christ, £2m? I'd be looking to bring either him or Ambrose here for the RW. Can you imagine how effective we'd be with 2 good wingers?

As easy as Derby? The worst team in Premiership histor took 4 points off us, that was out of a total of 11 points and they got them under Allardyce. Which games do you think we would we have won or drawn under Allardyce if we'd kept him? As I said a couple of hours back, the Derby games are powerful ammunition and it was only a matter of time before someone used them as such. We had some good results under Allardyce, as some want to forget. I've listed the games I think we'd have won or at the very least drawn under Sam.

Barton has blatantly been rushed back too many times. I really want him back in the team though, he's our best central midfielder by a distance.