Ronaldo

can't see why so many people are against it being Emre

Barton, Viduka, Rozenhal and Geremi for £10m, quality!

I almost feel sorry for Ramage technically the worst nufc player i've ever seen but a good lad his girlfriend goes to my uni, right stuck-up cunt, but he's still not in the same league as Carr or Baba for 'want rid'

got to be despise him more than any player in the world as a guy who sits near me in the Gallowgate says, 'there's only two people alive I hate, and they're both Stephen Carr'

I'm not, I just don't want him as first choice RB and I think a few appearances here and there for Chelsea in the absence of anyone else are making people think he's better than he is in that position. If he was any good back there, he'd not be going for nowt. didn't Chelsea offer Bridge to us on August 30 for next to nowt, says more about the club than the player agree that he's not ideal as first choice RB but he's a country mile ahead of anything we've played there in recent seasons Don't think they did, I've never heard anything more than "ITK" nonsense. Find it very hard to believe that they would, and even if they did, they'd just signed/were about to sign a £16m left back. They don't have anyone who Mourinho genuinely likes at right back. could of sworn Kenyon made a reference to it never mind, just seen SSN, get the fuck in!

I'm not, I just don't want him as first choice RB and I think a few appearances here and there for Chelsea in the absence of anyone else are making people think he's better than he is in that position. If he was any good back there, he'd not be going for nowt. didn't Chelsea offer Bridge to us on August 30 for next to nowt, says more about the club than the player agree that he's not ideal as first choice RB but he's a country mile ahead of anything we've played there in recent seasons

it would appear so Huntington, Taylor, Solano, CARR, Ramage have played there for us in recent times, says it all

getting warmer

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it. not really, Hilario was never considered good enough to be first choice was he? No but you said when Ferreira and Boularouz were fit, Cudicini and Cech weren't. right, which is why Hilario is a bad comparison, are we going round in circles for the hell of it or what? So if Hilario is a bad comparison why did you use him as one? Wullie did, I think you need to read the thread, my point was he was a 'bad' comparison

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it. not really, Hilario was never considered good enough to be first choice was he? No but you said when Ferreira and Boularouz were fit, Cudicini and Cech weren't. right, which is why Hilario is a bad comparison, are we going round in circles for the hell of it or what?

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it. not really, Hilario was never considered good enough to be first choice was he?

not to mention Robbie Elliot's diving header

Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two?

yeah, what a game, was behind the goal where Robert smashed in that free-kick when 99% of the best of players would have chosen to cross it one of many wins that season that would have been written off after 60 mins had Robert not been on the pitch

Hilario is a bad comparison considering he was third choice Geremi was considered good enough to start when Boularouz and ferreira were fit

come on, Solano has done well for us there but you can't possibly think he's as effective as Geremi They're both right wingers who can do a job further back. Just because Geremi's played there for Chelsea doesn't make him any better. i know, but Geremi has the attributes to play back there. Solano has the intelligence and very little else

Duff, Owen, Martins, Rozenhal, Emre etc have all played with and beaten the best how the hell are they expected to look up to Steven Taylor? Duff, Owen, Martins and Emre could all certainly look up to Steven Taylor. hilarious do you expect any of them to?

come on, Solano has done well for us there but you can't possibly think he's as effective as Geremi

You only want one? Both the Neville brothers. Chimbonda. Eboue. There's 4 for starters there is no way Phillip Neville is better than Finnan at RB Eboue however.....

Geremi Taylor Rozenhal New LB wouldn't be dissapointed if we lined up like that in August

Duff, Owen, Martins, Rozenhal, Emre etc have all played with and beaten the best how the hell are they expected to look up to Steven Taylor?

those two would be worse than any of the ones you've discounted how would Emre be worse?

Butt will not start every game Solano will be on the bench at best if Geremi arrives, and that's looking very likely Given cannot captain a defence let alone a team Taylor is too young, too rash, and has the intelligence of a drunk/stoned Beckham leaves Emre, Owen, new signing

I'm aware of that, but fact is, he is a CB and still played ahead of him. by whos definition is he a CB, he can play either comfortably and is world class in both positions WORLD CLASS?! yes Marquez is world class in both positions

the first two I couldn't agree more with, Ferdinand and Cech need to be there Essien however is twice the player Lampard is