Jump to content

junkhead

Member
  • Posts

    5,523
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by junkhead

  1. he delivered man.. what do you expect? PL top goalscorer?
  2. It would have been 4-2 to us you are right, let's sign Darren Bent
  3. are all members of The "If we can get our money back on Martins and get Darren Bent in, then that would be great" Party blind?
  4. oh.. he's right.. let's buy a forward.. then we'll score shitloads in every game and we'll win the title for Glenn
  5. man, we've been playing the exactly same way for the whole season.. and it has occurred to you that Roeder is a clown just last week?
  6. he's not what we need.. Sven i mean..
  7. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot em.. we're not.. that's his point here was i talking to you? grant said you should campaign ALL THE TIME but my point is if we were winning why would people want to protest your point is f****** s*** are you special needs or something? its not hard to understand what im saying. my point is that we shouldnt have to protest all the time because for example say roeder is still manager next season, and he goes on to win every game next season why would anyone be bothered about protesting? i am special needs, yes.. what you're saying is fairly simple to understand, it's just not possible and has no relevance to what the guy said
  8. Glenn Roeder doesn't cry.. he's a hard bastard
  9. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot em.. we're not.. that's his point here was i talking to you? grant said you should campaign ALL THE TIME but my point is if we were winning why would people want to protest your point is fucking shit
  10. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot em.. we're not.. that's his point
  11. About 25, average age 17, all with tracky bottoms and toon shirts on... with toon shirts on? now that's some stupid fuckers eh?
  12. we want allardyce. we - want - allardyce
  13. he won't resign, because the guy is a FIGHTER.. no fear, no regrets and that
  14. sack the board sack the board sack the boaaard
  15. http://www.bbc.co.uk/southyorkshire/content/images/2006/05/02/sue_203_203x152.jpg badass
×
×
  • Create New...