nufcjmc

Thanks jordan had me worried for a second 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Agreed it's a balancing act do you back Eddie to develop a 22 or 23 year old of course you do but will it be a hall and osula type of never playing year 1. Do you spend more potentially abroad and they dont adapt to the league. No transfer is without risk and the rewards of prem proven are big especially if the aspiration is back to back champions league qualification. What happened to Boniface? If sesko is 60m at 22 I feel he's a better longer term choice especially as most assume isak is likely away in a year. However totally get the club have multiple positions to fill and are leaning on a immediate sure thing.

Really expected a signing or two for the lads setting off tomorrow. I picked a bad time to stop biting my nails 3 weeks until the league starts its going to carry on being a frustrating window. Even more narking when chelsea get linked one day and get agreement the next.

Should have added as unlikely as it is a bruno cover and a tonali cover depending what we think miley is then an alternative to playing big joe. Obviously willock is still here rightly or wrongly meaning the manager probably feels we do have depth other than a longstaff replacement.

An I being greedy wanting wissa and then 2 in midfield to play a 10/in attack then another as more of a DM

I think it they want 40 or 45m liverpool must be fairly certain he's theirs for free next summer so why spend.

I agree but.... London, club wins things so in turn your "part of it". Arrogance from the player they are so good they will force their way into managers plans. Fixed income for 6 or 7 years meaning no drop off in what you earn despite how you perform. Some players its a job not what they love so what I described above is good enough.

Its mostly gone online too was/is cheapest at Newcastle shop but still online at adidas/jd I think for more money.

I think his stats were the best ever last year playing up front centrally. When Toney was there think he was across the 3 or super sub. Not disagreeing at all he's a mile better than Wilson currently is. He will also be playing in a better side but dont want to get my hopes that him starting 20 games a season will add that many goal contributions. A worthy backup and someone you can rely on for that sort of outlay will be good enough for now.

Been asked before I am sure but will there be more adidas original casual wear year on year? If so when? Lost 12stone 9lbs now so gone from a 4xl to an xl and would like to treat myself.

I mean FFS that update is shite if the bid hasn't been accepted and the resolution is more talks of course a resolution may be more money

Tosin albeit shite source available for 30m makes Kelly look a bargain 😀

Think they will be banking on new manager getting more out of them than big ange which is a possibility.

Agreed ran Isak into the ground and offered no real competition either. Did Wilson get a league goal last year?

Hopefully this will allow us to distribute funds and spend more on a class CB or a ready to challenge the 3 midfielders. Happy with this if it goes through at sub 35m let's hope we dont have to compromise on all targets this window.

26 in 2 weeks getting on a bit now 🤭

Ruddy?

I get what your saying especially when we may not have this level of money to invest again in a while. I take it as are they better than Wilson and almiron which is a clear yes IF they were to replicate similar form to last year that's an extra 35 goal contribution we were doing without before.

Excuses for him not to travel to drag out the speculation 😭😭 https://www.newcastleworld.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/alexander-isak-injury-newcastle-united-liverpool-transfers-5237140

Your guess is as good as mine as we have no clue on budget everyone we went for so far we're in alot of cases alternatives which could have been balanced by spending less in another area. At face value we had 69m for ekitike so that's 39m left and gained 12 from longstaff and 20m from Kelly so maybe 100m?

Some reports saying 25m was a few days ago and we will go higher. Might be us being cheeky or could have been forrest owner pissing them off. Might be we offer the money in cash as a lump so better payment terms. All guess work here obviously.

Only rumours are arsenal pivoted and man united "baulked" at the price. Fee reports have been anything as much as 110m euro and as low as 70m euro so who knows what's going on.

Possibly 🤣 I think my point is more what's left amortisation of Isaks deal now and selling for 130 but spending say 90 means it just pays for itself if it was sesko we would be getting someone 3 or 4 years younger with no pedigree of prem goals we have had out of Isak. Can see why the club would demand more but depends how much of a stinker the player could kick up. Anyway enough of the hypertheticals hopefully he's here to stay.

So let's entertain Isak going now for 130m do we just plow it all into 90m for sesko?

Depends how and who triggers the year option if its the player and he has indicated he won't do that then yes does push the need for sale. Big risk for them taking 40 goals out of their side plus the manager for around 100m.