oldtype

Not the individual player as such but if we end up a few places higher then we will have made more money from that. Rarely will those few places which we may or may not move up recoup the loan fee and wages of that player, so it's a no-go under the current regime. Honestly I'm not that bothered. Loan players are available for a reason and it's quite rare that they make an immediate impact. (Someone like Sturridge being a truly exceptional case.) And as previously mentioned they rob us of the opportunity to develop our own youth. Don't think someone like Macheda would be any better than Best or Ameobi.

That's better

Right, when the alternatives are a lobotomy or open-heart surgery, you'd take the root canal. I'm completely agreeing with Ronaldo. I feel weird.

We don't need to care about Sunderland's results this year in any case. It's not like they're in competition with us.

Southampton have signed Lee Tadanari, the Korean-Japanese striker who scored the winning goal in the Asian Cup finals last year. Blood traitor

The best manager gif is still that "Rafa Magic" one from a few years ago. http://animating.ru/signatures/data/media/3/Benitez_magic_hands.gif

I imagine this is what winning silverware feels like.

True though, even if I did mean it but not quite to the level that got you chomping. You called Park Chu-Young shit, that would be like me making insinuations about the sexual orientation of your mother. Only in Korea. Probably only for me actually

Might give us a bit more movement in the final third like. Given that that's exactly what we're lacking on the wings it might be worth a shot. So far this guy has reminded me of Kevin Nolan more than anyone (That doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement for putting him on the wing... But, you get the idea)

True though, even if I did mean it but not quite to the level that got you chomping. You called Park Chu-Young shit, that would be like me making insinuations about the sexual orientation of your mother.

Simpson is in terrible, terrible form but I still think in the abstract he's a better RB option than Taylor.

Play him on the right? Worth a shot?

R.Taylor shades it due to ability to stick in a cross and his set pieces. If I have to watch another of Cabaye's corners I may just cry I think I remember Ryan Taylor starting at RB against Man U at home during the relegation season. It's not a happy memory.

I hate the "I can't be bothered with this argument anymore so I'll pretend I was on the wind up from the beginning. You're the fool for taking it seriously!" card.

Thing is, if you asked anyone as recently as six months ago they probably would have answered in the exact opposite. Saylor was in the form of his life before his injury but up until then he's mostly shown to be about on par or even slightly below Williamson. Williamson now has a chance to prove that he can up his game as well.

No need to argue. They'll just sell for 15m instead to ensure that none of us are happy

Because he Park is Korean, and he hasn't dropped one of the form players in world football for him obviously, despite Park being seen as fairly shit by most Arsenal fans. Think I'd give up with football if we signed that abomination. Really? What are these judgements being based on? The 300 minutes competitive football in 4 relatively meaningless games he's been given in the past four months? His 0 Premiership appearances? His 7 goals in 5 games for the national team since joining Arsenal? Obviously I'm not advocating that he start ahead of RVP. Why is he not even on the bench of Chamakh, who supposedly has no future at Arsenal? Why is a geriatric Thierry Henry being loaned for two months so they can keep him off the bench while Chamakh is away at the ACON? Why has he not been given a single minute in a game that matters to prove that he's not terrible? And if he's so shit that Wenger can tell he's shit without even seeing him play, why go to the trouble of pulling him out of a hotel room in Lille and signing him for a good bit of money in the first place? Why? He obviously realised what a monumental fuck up he made, hence not playing him despite everything said above. He's that bad that they've had to go out and sign Henry which speaks volumes. He's not though. I'm biased, but I know that he's more than good enough to at least get a chance to prove that he can play. If there was no intention of letting him be anything other than emergency cover, then they should have not signed him as opposed to ruining a decent player's career. He's been given game time in the Champions League but proved he wasn't up to it. By that logic Coloccini should have never played for us again starting sometime around October 2008.

Because he Park is Korean, and he hasn't dropped one of the form players in world football for him obviously, despite Park being seen as fairly shit by most Arsenal fans. Think I'd give up with football if we signed that abomination. Really? What are these judgements being based on? The 300 minutes competitive football in 4 relatively meaningless games he's been given in the past four months? His 0 Premiership appearances? His 7 goals in 5 games for the national team since joining Arsenal? Obviously I'm not advocating that he start ahead of RVP. Why is he not even on the bench of Chamakh, who supposedly has no future at Arsenal? Why is a geriatric Thierry Henry being loaned for two months so they can keep him off the bench while Chamakh is away at the ACON? Why has he not been given a single minute in a game that matters to prove that he's not terrible? And if he's so shit that Wenger can tell he's shit without even seeing him play, why go to the trouble of pulling him out of a hotel room in Lille and signing him for a good bit of money in the first place? Why? He obviously realised what a monumental fuck up he made, hence not playing him despite everything said above. He's that bad that they've had to go out and sign Henry which speaks volumes. He's not though. I'm biased, but I know that he's more than good enough to at least get a chance to prove that he can play. If there was no intention of letting him be anything other than emergency cover, then they should have not signed him as opposed to ruining a decent player's career.

Whatever. If he plays in the Premiership and is over 25 we probably won't sign him regardless of how much he's on.

f***ing hope not. Aye! Would be a good signing for them. Well looks like the rumours are in full swing now! I've been conditioned to not expect anything from January to the point where I didn't even notice that the window was open this time around

Because he Park is Korean, and he hasn't dropped one of the form players in world football for him obviously, despite Park being seen as fairly shit by most Arsenal fans. Think I'd give up with football if we signed that abomination. Really? What are these judgements being based on? The 300 minutes competitive football in 4 relatively meaningless games he's been given in the past four months? His 0 Premiership appearances? His 7 goals in 5 games for the national team since joining Arsenal? Obviously I'm not advocating that he start ahead of RVP. Why is he not even on the bench of Chamakh, who supposedly has no future at Arsenal? Why is a geriatric Thierry Henry being loaned for two months so they can keep him off the bench while Chamakh is away at the ACON? Why has he not been given a single minute in a game that matters to prove that he's not terrible? And if he's so shit that Wenger can tell he's shit without even seeing him play, why go to the trouble of pulling him out of a hotel room in Lille and signing him for a good bit of money in the first place? Why?

I'd suggest that we loan Park Chu-Young given that Wenger is being a cunt, but then again, we don't loan players.

Well said.

Holy f***ing hell. It's only since I started to browse RAWK that my hatred of Liverpool sky rocketed. It's like a brain washing cult. http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/6060/kydf.jpg tbh

Or Vuckic away at Anfield. Oh wait.. Fair point. I conclude i dont have a clue what pards will do, and i am a fool for second guessing him. Pretty much the only thing that's guaranteed is that whatever he does, we won't be happy with it