mrmojorisin75

we break managers for fun, moving onto top lawyers now

I didn't see the Blackburn game that's provoked a lot of discussion but unless I'm mistaken he's been played up front again in a team had around 35% possession at home to a team from a lower division. That about right?

Be someone that's been to jail, is going to jail, or has done something ropey af then

based on....?

if we could somehow get £15-20m for him we should do it immediately and then go and sign cantwell or someone with the money, we all know how much ashley likes to take a loss though

did bruce throw him up front again last night? i mean this lad looks shite but he's gotta have some help from someone, pls

Ashley has previous in taking on closed shop setups he doesn't like. Hopefully this has really pissed him off, seems so.

looks a solid mid table PL midfielder to me, hard to say any more at this stage

been here less than a week, steve bacon will sort that out stat

oddly i thought he looked considerably more comfortable on the ball than last season, his touch looked better and he looked like he might actually be able to do something with the ball for a change more brazilian almost

so that's what a proper striker looks like

if actual mike ashley is in any way linked to that account, even by just agreeing to it existing from someone he knows, i might have to revise my opinion of him

went into overdrive yesterday like

Ok cool PL you'll either be approving/rejecting it soon, or issuing instructions on what can be done to get it approved without further delay? Because the owner of the fucking club just said yesterday the takeover wasn't off and understood you'd rejected it.

Even up until yesterday they were expecting a 'Yes'. I just don't get that at all. What are they basing that on? Is Manorpark Amanda Staveley? the talks that have been ongoing presumably? it's been a constant theme though hasn't it, the buyers saying they're getting positive noises only for it to fall apart...as someone just said there are lies being told somewhere, and i know where my money is

guess it's just confirmation that ashley actively wants out and seems willing to push things to be able to get it done

you keep saying this without explaining the basis for it, this is where we started Because the PL has rejected the deal. just say it's total and utter guesswork man, and not "from what i understand" as if you have some info that supports your conclusion :lol: well ok then What a rebuttal.

you keep saying this without explaining the basis for it, this is where we started Because the PL has rejected the deal. just say it's total and utter guesswork man, and not "from what i understand" as if you have some info that supports your conclusion :lol: well ok then

you keep saying this without explaining the basis for it, this is where we started Because the PL has rejected the deal. just say it's total and utter guesswork man, and not "from what i understand" as if you have some info that supports your conclusion

This is really just a capital investment for PIF, not and emotional one like it is for us. If Staveley rings them up and says, "aal sorted lads, this is back on" then I can't think of any reason that they wouldn't just go ahead and make the investment as they were going to a couple of months ago. Are they still all following us on twitter? That's obviously the biggest tell yeah i think losing face will be the only thing preventing them doing anything, if ashley/staveley can sort a route whereby there's no loss of face for them they'll be back like a shot - they obviously had plans to use the club as a vehicle, can't see why that would change

you keep saying this without explaining the basis for it, this is where we started

Getting their £17m deposit back is a reason they would have resubmitted their bid. based on what nees? Based on, I don't understand the question? The PL has made a decision and rejected the bid now, that means they are entitled to their deposit back from what I understand or can proceed with an appeal. what are you basing your conclusion on that the reason for the resubmission, if indeed it was that, will get them the £17m back? i've not seen it suggested anywhere at all so was wondering why you think it's the sole reason for it all? the appeal yes, that makes sense

the owners bit did occur to me but that's not realistic man

Getting their £17m deposit back is a reason they would have resubmitted their bid. based on what nees?

literally don't see the point in that statement if ashley isn't going to do anything about it, indeed given they apparently have a good relationship it could be staveley et al pushing ashley along the legal with promises of reimbursement for costs or something also this "pif are gone" bollocks, not buying that either...if they can get the deal pushed through my feeling is they'll be back otherwise what have the ongoing talks that pushed the rejection been about if they've left the deal forever?