Kaizero

He's only 22, would fit our age regime. The price however, would not.

Everyone with a bit of sense 95% of the world's population.

http://www.nufcfans.co.uk/2010/07/insider-newcastle-tracking-skjelbred.html <-- That, THAT, is the source? Seems to have started from this dude ( ), a regular Kaizero in the rumour department he is.

A few people? Random people who have nothing to do with sport whatsoever, or? As much as I'd cum if he signed for us, I really don't see us going after another midfielder now.

What does that text speak mean ? Too long; didn't read.

I'm guessing you haven't seen us play this season We're fucking shit, and it was even worse in these two legs. Mind, we did play excellent against Malmö, one of the top teams, in the first league game after the WC, and with a new manager. Reckon it's at least 60-40 in your advantage. Not sure if you go straight into Europa League or if you have to qualify. Haven't been keeping up with Allsvenskan this season, no. And our main problem is that we're very toothless in front of goal, we've been huffing and puffing in almost all our recent games but still only get one or two in. Though, much of it could be down to Rade Prica being out with an injury as the attack is very dependent, too dependent on his presence up front. He's back now though, which was very noticable against Linfield. Also, with Skjelbred actually looking like himself after the return of Nils Arne Eggen as manager, the link-up play is fan-fucking tastic. I see the main issue being Morten Moldskred being absolute cack up front alongside Prica, though, and the attack will suffer until the day Eggen decides to drop Moldskred for Olsen and push Iversen up alongside Prica. The goals have came on request whenever that formation have been played, it bugs me to no end that they won't stick with it seeing how successful it's been when used. (Not that the names should mean anything to you, I just wanted to rant. ) Though all that don't matter when the ball won't go into the net regardless. This is the best time so far this season for you to play us with our best players just returning from injury. I think you'll edge it at home and the decisive match will be at Lerkendal where it will all depend on if Prica is fit or not.

Just signed a new four year contract with the MLS and the MLS have said they have no intention of letting him leave, not even on a loan.

"Women's football? I dunno what you're talking about. It's not women and it's definetly not football." - Ivar Hoff

I've learnt my lesson, it's all pseudonyms from now on, man!

tbf to Hughton, Zoo is a good read on the toilet. I get Zoo shipped to Norway just to read it on the can.

I've already sent quite a few e-mails asking various players to sign for my made-up Uzbek premier team, Cuntytwaturz United. I'm posing as the manager, Massiv Pussi, and offering them £50k a week.

At least Annan was believable, man. They're amateurs! Amateurs!

It's on Towelie, it's so on. Was too close to comfort getting through, mind. If this is how Rosenborg'll play in Europe I'm really nervous. I'm right in thinking that whoever lose at this stage will get into the EL qualifiers, or?

Only to sell Cole on to fund a move for Messi, though.

I don't get everyone's deal with gold trim, in my book it's just another colour. Is it because some clubs make gold shirts for when they win something? Or does people just not like gold?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3062125/Spurs-lead-Toon-in-race-for-Raul.html#ixzz0uGgCKBaj At least the transfer story I made up was somewhat believable. The press are so fucking shit these days, man!

£50 on Dodgers to beat the Giants. Dodgers have 1 win in 6, Giants have 5 wins in 6. It belongs to the story I managed to click the wrong team and not notice before it was too late, mind.

Withdrew after the ref decided to fuck me over and rule out one of the best goals I've seen, so only lost £37. But still, I've not seen so much play towards one goal and that team not winning. Fucking hell, shots on goal was something like 23 - 2 iirc. How did you only lose 37 then? Couldn't believe they haven't scored either. Wanted to place my bet via mobile today, did that. And instead of 19,5€ it didn't take my comma and so I've accidentally put 195€ on Tromso dnb. Very nervous 90 minutes for me. Glad I've got my money back, at least. On the other hand, disappointed to not get a great win. Imagine if they'd won? And I bet with 2.35 odds, when I withdrew it was still only 2.50 but it just really felt like a typical "they played so well and still only drew, fucks sake" match, so I pussied out.

Withdrew after the ref decided to fuck me over and rule out one of the best goals I've seen, so only lost £37. But still, I've not seen so much play towards one goal and that team not winning. Fucking hell, shots on goal was something like 23 - 2 iirc.

£100 on Tromsø in-play @ 2.35, unsurprisingly returns £235.

Our current defense is young, so if we're after another addition I'd welcome experience. Our midfield is aging, so if we're after another addition I'd welcome a hungry youngster. It all depends on the situation, so it's a hard question.

I heard Calderwood did it under orders from Hughton. He is tinkering with Annan and Hunterlaars pages as we speak. Yeah, will give us a good squad on paper when they print out the Wiki updates.

Interesting trivia: As part of his contract with the MLS, David Beckham has the option to own the 20th franchise added to the MLS.

When does this rebuilding start? How do we assure our premier league status for the next 2-3 years without starting that rebuilding now? Why does it have to be next season or the one after that? What gives you any confidence that if we don't spend anything significant this year to help keep a newly promoted team up that we will next season to improve? Say we do finish 17th this season, how will we be any better off than we are now? I think we'll actually be less attractive to players, to TV schedulers, and to supporters. We certainly wont be on TV as much at the start of next season as we're going to be on this if we scrape to safety playing poor football, so there'll be less coming in year on year and we'll eventually lose the financial advantage over a lot of other clubs that for the moment we still have. Maybe people are still hanging on to this pipe dream of a bunch of the youth team becoming good premiership players (and us subsequently being able to hang on to them) and we'll rise up the table on the back of that? It's not going to happen, it really isn't. This season we will have a significantly larger turnover than most other teams in this division, the wages are down to a manageable level, and if we don't spend much on transfers the club should make a handsome profit this year. Why should we not expect the club to spend money on a few good players now which might make this season a bit more comfortable? Because we don't have that money now. Next year, we'll have that money, and then we can be expected to invest a bit more than we are now. There's a much talked about five year plan put in place by Ashley which states just that. And as much as I hate Ashley, given the current financial climate in football, it's not the worst plan in the world compared to spunking millions we don't have on players and potentially still going down and then being in severe financial issues. (Hull is one example.)

I'm gonna blame you since they'd have won had you put it on.