Kaizero

The Athletic. And that was in December of 2019. Can assume it’s run down some since and will be a sliding / declining scale. Think loki679[/member] said any employee in China can quit with a thirty day notice and no penalties?

That happened months ago. It's because of this from this morning: I mean, that to me reads like two rich people making fun of "Jack"

Will try to make this one.

I mean, I love him and all that, but there's one that's just an error and you can see it on his own reaction

Actors won't be getting paid for doing nowt. Neither will golfers, I expect. It's a really dumb inclusion in that list, which in itself is rather stupid as a whole.

Yikes, not a good look for him. Lad is destined to finish his career in the lower leagues. Why? He's already 29, not much time left to spend in the lower leagues. Especially not for someone talented.

As I mentioned, Nyland (Villa keeper) was interviewed in the Norwegian news and he was amazed at why they've not been asked to take wage cuts, and that other players he has spoken to had said the same, and that they were pushing the clubs for it but the clubs were holding back for some reason.

Ørjan Nyland and other Norwegian PL professionals were on the Norwegian news all flabbergasted at why they've not been asked to have cuts to their wage like in other countries, saying they and other players they've spoken to want to do it but not been given the option by the clubs yet, and they don't understand why.

I mean, at the current point in time FIFA is considering extending expiring contracts so it's obvious that NUFC will be leaking stories about signing players on a free we likely can't sign on a free.

Can't make it, family related. Have fun the rest of you!

Most Norwegian clubs have put their players on leave, they're now getting the same benefits from the government (up to the same maximum level as others) as "normal" people and are forced to accept short term jobs if offered to continue getting said benefits. Downside for the clubs are that per Norwegian law, after 14 days on leave they'e allowed to sign for another club if that club says they'll pay full wages. Seems to be a gentlemans agreement between most players and clubs in Norway, but some differences as certain clubs have kept their foreign players on the payroll as they don't qualify for benefits from the Norwegian state being foreign nationals - as well as players clubs are afraid will fuck off to other clubs after 14 days. Also read Messi, Pique and others have turned down getting a 50% wage cut during the period there is no football.

I'll play

Could always hold him, on remand. By not allowing him to turn up to work or discriminating against him until proven guilty, they'd be breaking Norwegian law. Guy was obviously very guilty, but still. Difficult situation for Molde to be in either way.

I mean, OGS and Molde did nothing wrong there. Guy was charged with rape, got to play whilst the case was ongoing as being charged does not equal guilty - however, when he was found guilty, he was immediately released by the club and then he fled the country. The club or OGS had nothing to do with that. You could possibly argue that he should have been suspended with the case ongoing, but what if he'd been found innocent? Suspending him essentially just fully assumes that he will be found guilty.

"What goes through your mind before a shot like that?" "To be honest, I just get the ball and think "shoot!" I love Haaland

Haaland gets another.

Didn't end up at Man Utd 'cause they wouldn't agree to a buy-out clause and for Raiola, Haaland and Daddy Haaland getting % of a future transfer fee.

Buy-Out Clause of £20m, he'll have just decided himself amongst the bidders.

He almost came to Newcastle before we got Bruce. I'd have preferred Gattuso.

15. Failed at most of the one victory teams.

I thought they would have got Kovac. When was the last time Klinsmann managed? Klinsmann is only a temp appointment to the end of the season, assumption is that Kovac comes in then. Last time was when he left the US national side in 2016.

Ukraine is in a group of 5, France in a group of 6. Results against lowest team in 6-team groups are removed. Ukraine therefore has 20 points, France 19. Going by point b), as they are equal on point a), Ukraine gets the highest seed of the two.

How are seedings calculated? Seedings are based on overall European Qualifiers rankings, which are determined as follows (results against teams in sixth place are discarded): a) final position in group b) points c) goal difference d) goals scored e) away goals scored f) number of wins g) number of away wins h) lower disciplinary points total (3 points for red card including for second booking, 1 point for single yellow card for a player in a match) i) position in overall UEFA Nations League rankings --- Fairly straightforward, unless France should be first seed based solely on being a historically bigger footballing nation. any seeding system that has the world cup champions and previous euros runner ups who topped their qualifying group below ukraine who lost all their matchs at euro 2016 and failed to qualify for the world cup is clearly flawed and needs an overhaul. This isn't about who's a bigger country its about france's recent record being excellent and somehow still being in pot 2 below a very mediocre team You can be World Cup holders and not qualify for the next World Cup.

They're seeded, they're just not a top seed because of the seeding rules of the competition they are in. I really don't see the issue. There's a set of rules with regards to seeding in the competition they are competing, they didn't make the top cut because of those rules, which apply to each competing nation.