-
Posts
3,117 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by manorpark
-
Know what you mean. Don't agree though.
-
You 'avin-a-go' like? Did I ever say we would not be de-listing? no you said it was a major milestone dictating the point at which Ashley would start doing something And it is! Yes it is. This happened at 08.00 this morning. Did you want him to buy Deco at 08.01? seriously, tell me why he wouldn't have 1 week ago? You are persistant. I said I was not going to debate that point (again) as it has been thoroughly discussed and answered (and it is 'obvious' anyway). So pack it in!! it's not f****** obvious FFS It is. take away the names and it's like vic's arguning with himself Just looked in the mirror . . . . . . SH*T, its TRRRRRUE !!!!!!
-
You 'avin-a-go' like? Did I ever say we would not be de-listing? no you said it was a major milestone dictating the point at which Ashley would start doing something And it is! Yes it is. This happened at 08.00 this morning. Did you want him to buy Deco at 08.01? seriously, tell me why he wouldn't have 1 week ago? You are persistant. I said I was not going to debate that point (again) as it has been thoroughly discussed and answered (and it is 'obvious' anyway). So pack it in!! it's not f****** obvious FFS It is.
-
You 'avin-a-go' like? Did I ever say we would not be de-listing? no you said it was a major milestone dictating the point at which Ashley would start doing something And it is! Yes it is. This happened at 08.00 this morning. Did you want him to buy Deco at 08.01? seriously, tell me why he wouldn't have 1 week ago? You are persistant. I said I was not going to debate that point (again) as it has been thoroughly discussed and answered (and it is 'obvious' anyway). So pack it in!!
-
You 'avin-a-go' like? Did I ever say we would not be de-listing? no you said it was a major milestone dictating the point at which Ashley would start doing something And it is! Yes it is. This happened at 08.00 this morning. Did you want him to buy Deco at 08.01? Still need to finish the Strategic Review though . . . cough!!
-
Be interesting to see if theres any offical/local confirmation of this. If Owen does stay, until January at least, then we do indeed have some very decent forward options again, injuries permitting! Can't find anything to link us to on the Express website. Where did you see this? EDIT - just seen you refer to "The Gossip Column", not sure if you can link to that! http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/13863/Oba-desperate-to-be-part-of-Toon-revolution Well found. This is good news. Even if it is never confirmed officially, it is good to read! Now, lets forget about the forwards (Owen/Martins/Viduka/Ameobi, will do me for now) and get on with getting two quality defenders for every defensive position. Five more still needed (have I mentioned that before??) REALLY Looking forward to this season !!!!!!!!!
-
You 'avin-a-go' like? Did I ever say we would not be de-listing?
-
This is true, but I still think he needs to be careful. Powerful people tend to be ruthless people.
-
Strangely Vic, I agree with what you say here. I think Allardyce has to be careful. He has now publicly criticised the new owners for being too slow - twice. He will be told to shut up (at the very least). Pity though, it was interesting to hear what he (Sam) said about this. (PS - UV, I have attempted to reply to your above questions, as you requested, on the 'delisting' thread).
-
He sure learned that lesson well. I was told in another thread that Mort has been running things for months (before he was even appointed to the board) without the old board having any involvement. Is that in the rules? As a number of people in this thread are in the "wait for the review" camp, can someone please answer my questions here. Cheers. YOUR QUESTIONS / MY ATTEMPTS AT ANSWERS: *This internal review has been ongoing for 3 weeks now. How much longer do you think it's going to take? DEPENDS WHAT THEY FIND . . . INEFFICIENCIES/INADEQUATE EMPLOYEES . . . FRAUD??? *Is 3 weeks not easily long enough to review the major parts of the business which would affect transfers and allow a transfer budget to be assigned? Obviously Allardyce has some money to work with, but it's equally obvious from his comments yesterday that this is currently a limited amount. Ashley has his own people in now who can negotiate the deals, so he'll know what's going on during a new transfer. If a more substantial amount of money is forthcoming, then what's stopping it? HE IS REVIEWING THE WHOLE BUSINESS THOROUGHLY. REMEMBER HE DIDN'T DO 'DUE DILIGENCE'. *Reading between the lines of his interview yesterday, Allardyce seems to be almost as much in the dark as we are. Is this review so time intensive that Mort can't even spare an hour to discuss things with the manager of the club at a critical point in the season for transfers? I THINK THEY WILL BE DISCUSSING THINGS (PROBABLY) EVERY DAY. *Do you believe that this review is anything more than just a cost cutting exercise and review of the managerial structure? The major monetary ins and outs are all in the club's accounts and will have been reviewed before he bought his first share. Do you think that lots of secret undercover work is being done to find hidden debts or something? IT IS A REVIEW OF PROCESSES, PROCEDURES, AND PEOPLE - NOT THE 'MAJOR MONETARY INS & OUTS' - ALSO, I DO NOT THINK IT IS A COST-CUTTING EXERCISE. THERE IS NO POINT IN "JUST" DOING THAT. NOT WHEN YOU HAVE INVESTED £133m. *I've repeatedly heard many posters on here claim that the only way Ashley is going to make money from the club is by investing lots in the playing staff to ultimately get us into the CL. If this is the case, then what difference is an internal review going to make to the amount of money spent on the squad? What could it possibly turn up (after 3 weeks) which would significantly change this policy? ALL OF US HAVE A WAY OF DOING THINGS - THIS IS OBVIOUSLY HIS. MY COMMENTS : The main thing that is holding us back is the review (now that we ARE de-listed, from this morning) - but add to this also, the fact that Ashley/Mort are 'currently inexperienced' in the ways of football transfers and finance. Sam has already commented twice on this - hope it doesn't lose him his job. I really think he has to be careful doing this, suspect Mort will 'have a word' (probably already has). I think we will look back on this learning-period though, and be glad our owners were initially 'prudent' and took the time to learn. Apart from Manchester Uniteds and (some of) Liverpools player purchases, no-one is buying many that I would want, at this stage. Plenty of time to start getting-it-right!!
-
Be interesting to see if theres any offical/local confirmation of this. If Owen does stay, until January at least, then we do indeed have some very decent forward options again, injuries permitting! Can't find anything to link us to on the Express website. Where did you see this? EDIT - just seen you refer to "The Gossip Column", not sure if you can link to that!
-
Back to the real business. Ashley (for many reasons) will stump up the cash when we have delisted. He is a very successful ("if not always as meticulous as he might have been" . . . ) businessman. He will be what we need to (also) be successful. what reasons? why does he not think he owns the club right now? is he simple? you've ignored the fact he's already stumped up the money, it's Fat Sam who can't land the players, but I really want to see this gem explained I will not debate such an obvious issue, which I (and Jai) have in any case fully explained already. you haven't explained it all, because you can't. there is no reason why he would not spend money now, that's a fact. He may surprise me!! I hope he does. Anyway, it's been a long day, think I'll just go and see if she is still awake . . . . in fact who cares, won't let that get in the way! Goodnight.
-
Back to the real business. Ashley (for many reasons) will stump up the cash when we have delisted. He is a very successful ("if not always as meticulous as he might have been" . . . ) businessman. He will be what we need to (also) be successful. what reasons? why does he not think he owns the club right now? is he simple? you've ignored the fact he's already stumped up the money, it's Fat Sam who can't land the players, but I really want to see this gem explained I will not debate such an obvious issue, which I (and Jai) have in any case fully explained already.
-
Back to the real business. Ashley (for many reasons) will stump up the cash when we have delisted. He is a very successful ("if not always as meticulous as he might have been" . . . ) businessman. He will be what we need to (also) be successful.
-
I may not have said all that specific detail Jai, but that is what I meant by the company being all his (meaning, off the LSE and without all the fuss associated with a PLC). apologies manorpark but I didnt quite get that from your post, and vic its not just a little paperwork, any large amounts have to be fully justified to sharholders, even if you are a 95% shareholder! This means employing people to draw up justifications and minute account details for everything! But it is more likely he is waiting until the internal review is over and then he will know exactly how much total money is needed. He seems like quite a meticulous man, unlike fatty! Agree he will probably feel he has to do the latter, and he is obviously a meticulous successful businessman. However, let us all hope the review can be concluded soon. Perhaps though, The 'bigger picture' in this mad world of football club ownership (different from most other businesses) may actually require him to go against his normal behaviour, and take a bit of a time-related chance, prior to full completion of the review (but post-delisting!). god this is absolutely nauseating, you're talking such crap tbh meticulous businessman? who researched so thoroughly on how to float a company he lost over half the value of SportsWorld on th stock market in two months due to his own self confessed errors? not even freddie managed that in 10 years! I seem to remember he said his personal errors were "PR" related. Anyway, even meticulous people do not always get everything right! Even I was wrong once. normally I would advise you to go read up on it, but I fear what really happened might come as too much of a shock to you and do you some permanent emotional damage tbh I don't do damage - thanks.
-
I doubt that, quite a very lot actually. You been married Vic? He hasn't even kissed a girl, so I doubt it. Explains a lot
-
I may not have said all that specific detail Jai, but that is what I meant by the company being all his (meaning, off the LSE and without all the fuss associated with a PLC). apologies manorpark but I didnt quite get that from your post, and vic its not just a little paperwork, any large amounts have to be fully justified to sharholders, even if you are a 95% shareholder! This means employing people to draw up justifications and minute account details for everything! But it is more likely he is waiting until the internal review is over and then he will know exactly how much total money is needed. He seems like quite a meticulous man, unlike fatty! Agree he will probably feel he has to do the latter, and he is obviously a meticulous successful businessman. However, let us all hope the review can be concluded soon. Perhaps though, The 'bigger picture' in this mad world of football club ownership (different from most other businesses) may actually require him to go against his normal behaviour, and take a bit of a time-related chance, prior to full completion of the review (but post-delisting!). god this is absolutely nauseating, you're talking such crap tbh meticulous businessman? who researched so thoroughly on how to float a company he lost over half the value of SportsWorld on th stock market in two months due to his own self confessed errors? not even freddie managed that in 10 years! I seem to remember he said his personal errors were "PR" related. Anyway, even meticulous people do not always get everything right! Even I was wrong once.
-
I doubt that, quite a very lot actually. You been married Vic?
-
I may not have said all that specific detail Jai, but that is what I meant by the company being all his (meaning, off the LSE and without all the fuss associated with a PLC). apologies manorpark but I didnt quite get that from your post, and vic its not just a little paperwork, any large amounts have to be fully justified to sharholders, even if you are a 95% shareholder! This means employing people to draw up justifications and minute account details for everything! But it is more likely he is waiting until the internal review is over and then he will know exactly how much total money is needed. He seems like quite a meticulous man, unlike fatty! Agree he will probably feel he has to do the latter, and he is obviously a meticulous successful businessman. However, let us all hope the review can be concluded soon. Perhaps though, The 'bigger picture' in this mad world of football club ownership (different from most other businesses) may actually require him to go against his normal behaviour, and take a bit of a time-related chance, prior to full completion of the review (but post-delisting!).
-
I may not have said all that specific detail Jai, but that is what I meant by the company being all his (meaning, off the LSE and without all the fuss associated with a PLC). you so did not mean it that way Oooh - but I am not biting tonight!
-
I may not have said all that specific detail Jai, but that is what I meant by the company being all his (meaning, off the LSE and without all the fuss associated with a PLC).
-
I will not debate such an obvious issue, which I have in any case, fully explained already.