manorpark

It depends on how serious the crimes committed by the EPL are. If they are running an "EPL Cartel" with BEin Sports and the Bent Six, then the factual exposure of that will produce a very different outcome to what you have described !!!

I'm no Wraith fan, but he obviously was not 'rinsed', as you put it. He more than held his own against that professional moron on TalkSport. He won the battle quite easily really, could anyone else on here do as well?

They would want to make their comment seem (at least) a little bit real !! They could hardly say "thankfully" could they . . .

Remember people . . . The darkest hour is just before dawn. Dawn will come, I can understand that some will find it difficult to feel that right now, but it WILL come.

Y U P

When it goes through I won't give a sh*t about their reaction. They aren't relevant to me or anyone I know now - so they will certainly not be relevant post-takeover either !!

Only because the exchanging of contracts and deposits of money, etc, was so much in the public domain then, as now. Sorry, but I could not think of any other reason why you would write what you wrote.

You must be choosing to make that up, but I cannot work out quite why you are doing so.

Yes, we have made (and are still making) a truly valiant attempt to make it public, but the EPL have so much to hide, there was always very little chance of that happening. Their refusal to agree with everyone else though, will have confirmed, in many peoples eyes, what most of us always thought about the EPLs need for secrecy. The CAT case will bring it all out, it will just come cascading out . . . and please can the usual susupects try not to ask me how I "know" that !!!!!

Yes, if you have ever seen the likes of "PMQs" in Parliament, then you know that it is pointless asking a politician anything serious or specific. They are trained not to answer, to not grasp the real meaning of the question . . . so they don't do either of those things.

What are you talking about?? Someone may have "imagined" a further extension, I didn't, Keith didn't . . did you? The good news is (that I have - on request - simply confirmed, as Keith also has confirmed) is that they (you?) are wrong, there is NO further extension of time after 12th July. Can we leave it at that please!

It is news and it is good news. You know that.

Yes.

Ha ha - "pot, kettle etc" (ahum . . . )

Not what you want to hear - but probably. (Without the "inverted commas")

Good news!

You are starting to L E A R N . . . well done !!!

He answered the first question clearly. If he had also answered the second question, there would have been a second answer. There was no second answer, so no ambiguity at all "asked and answered"!!

Seems very clear. "Has he gone?" "No he hasn't".

Yes, in reality you would have thought that they should be almost bending the rules to get our Takeover pushed through! However, there are those . . er . . "outside influences" at play. THEY will all be delightfully exposed by the CAT case!!

Ah, ok then !

It will be interesting to see how many of Keiths 'incessant critics' have the strength of character to come on here and make 'incessant apologies' when what he actually says happens, and the Takeover is approved.

Unfair, I don't use a spreadsheet ya knaa!

I've been asked to play myself. NB - that is "play myself", there is NO "with" in there, even though I have had my Cornies this morning already . . .

Exactly !